Integrating sustainability in management control systems: an exploratory study on Italian banks

IF 3.5 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Paola Ferretti, Cristina Gonnella, Pierluigi Martino
{"title":"Integrating sustainability in management control systems: an exploratory study on Italian banks","authors":"Paola Ferretti, Cristina Gonnella, Pierluigi Martino","doi":"10.1108/medar-03-2023-1954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>Drawing insights from institutional theory, this paper aims to examine whether and to what extent banks have reconfigured their management control systems (MCSs) in response to growing institutional pressures towards sustainability, understood as environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>The authors conducted an exploratory study at the three largest Italian banking groups to shed light on changes made in MCSs to account for ESG issues. The analysis is based on 12 semi-structured interviews with managers from the sustainability and controls areas, as well as from other relevant operational areas particularly concerned with the integration process of ESG issues. Additionally, secondary data sources were used. The Malmi and Brown (2008) MCS framework, consisting of a package of five types of formal and informal control mechanisms, was used to structure and analyse the empirical data.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The examined banks widely implemented numerous changes to their MCSs as a response to the heightened sustainability pressures from regulatory bodies and stakeholders. In particular, with the exception of action planning, the results show an extensive integration of ESG issues into the five control mechanisms of Malmi and Brown’s framework, namely, long-term planning, cybernetic, reward/compensation, administrative and cultural controls.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>By identifying the approaches banks followed in reconfiguring traditional MCSs, this research sheds light on how adequate MCSs can promote banks’ “sustainable behaviours”. The results can, thus, contribute to defining best practices on how MCSs can be redesigned to support the integration of ESG issues into the banks’ way of doing business.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>Overall, the findings support the theoretical assertion that institutional pressures influence the design of banks’ MCSs, and that both formal and informal controls are necessary to ensure a real engagement towards sustainability. More specifically, this study reveals that MCSs, by encompassing both formal and informal controls, are central to enabling banks to appropriately understand, plan and control the transition towards business models fully oriented to the integration of ESG issues. Thereby, this allows banks to effectively respond to the increased stakeholder demands around ESG concerns.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":18453,"journal":{"name":"Meditari Accountancy Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Meditari Accountancy Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/medar-03-2023-1954","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Drawing insights from institutional theory, this paper aims to examine whether and to what extent banks have reconfigured their management control systems (MCSs) in response to growing institutional pressures towards sustainability, understood as environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues.

Design/methodology/approach

The authors conducted an exploratory study at the three largest Italian banking groups to shed light on changes made in MCSs to account for ESG issues. The analysis is based on 12 semi-structured interviews with managers from the sustainability and controls areas, as well as from other relevant operational areas particularly concerned with the integration process of ESG issues. Additionally, secondary data sources were used. The Malmi and Brown (2008) MCS framework, consisting of a package of five types of formal and informal control mechanisms, was used to structure and analyse the empirical data.

Findings

The examined banks widely implemented numerous changes to their MCSs as a response to the heightened sustainability pressures from regulatory bodies and stakeholders. In particular, with the exception of action planning, the results show an extensive integration of ESG issues into the five control mechanisms of Malmi and Brown’s framework, namely, long-term planning, cybernetic, reward/compensation, administrative and cultural controls.

Practical implications

By identifying the approaches banks followed in reconfiguring traditional MCSs, this research sheds light on how adequate MCSs can promote banks’ “sustainable behaviours”. The results can, thus, contribute to defining best practices on how MCSs can be redesigned to support the integration of ESG issues into the banks’ way of doing business.

Originality/value

Overall, the findings support the theoretical assertion that institutional pressures influence the design of banks’ MCSs, and that both formal and informal controls are necessary to ensure a real engagement towards sustainability. More specifically, this study reveals that MCSs, by encompassing both formal and informal controls, are central to enabling banks to appropriately understand, plan and control the transition towards business models fully oriented to the integration of ESG issues. Thereby, this allows banks to effectively respond to the increased stakeholder demands around ESG concerns.

将可持续性纳入管理控制系统:对意大利银行的探索性研究
目的本文从制度理论出发,旨在研究银行是否以及在多大程度上重新配置了管理控制系统(MCS),以应对可持续发展(可理解为环境、社会和治理(ESG)问题)方面日益增长的制度压力。作者对意大利最大的三家银行集团进行了一项探索性研究,以揭示管理控制系统为考虑 ESG 问题而做出的改变。分析基于 12 个半结构化访谈,访谈对象是可持续发展和控制领域的管理人员,以及其他相关业务领域的管理人员,特别是与环境、社会和公司治理问题整合过程有关的管理人员。此外,还使用了二手数据来源。马尔米和布朗(2008 年)的监控监框架由五类正式和非正式监控机制组成,用于构建和分析实证数据。研究结果受访银行广泛实施了多项监控监变革,以应对来自监管机构和利益相关者的更大可持续发展压力。特别是,除行动规划外,研究结果表明将环境、社会和公司治理问题广泛纳入了马尔米和布朗框架中的五种控制机制,即长期规划、控制论、奖励/补偿、行政和文化控制。通过确定银行在重新配置传统监控监时所遵循的方法,本研究揭示了适当的监控监如何促进银行的 "可持续行为"。因此,研究结果有助于确定最佳实践,即如何重新设计监控监,以支持将环境、社会和公司治理问题纳入银行的经营方式。原创性/价值总体而言,研究结果支持以下理论论断:制度压力会影响银行监控监的设计,而正式和非正式控制对于确保真正参与可持续发展都是必要的。更具体地说,本研究揭示了监控监理制度包含正式和非正式的监控措施,是使银行能够适当了解、规划和控制向完全以整合环境、社会和公司治理问题为导向的业务模式过渡的核心。因此,这使银行能够有效应对利益相关者围绕环境、社会和治理问题提出的越来越多的要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Meditari Accountancy Research
Meditari Accountancy Research BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
66
期刊介绍: Meditari Accountancy Research (MEDAR). MEDAR takes its name from the Latin for constantly pondering, suggesting a journey towards a better understanding of accountancy related matters through research. Innovative and interdisciplinary approaches are encouraged. The journal is a double blind refereed publication that welcomes manuscripts using diverse research methods that address a wide range of accountancy related topics, where the terms accountancy and accounting are interpreted broadly. Manuscripts should be theoretically underpinned. Topics may include, but are not limited to: Auditing, Financial reporting, Impact of accounting on organizations, Impact of accounting on capital markets, Impact of accounting on individuals, Management accounting, Public sector accounting, Regulation of the profession, Risk management, Social and environmental disclosure, Impact of taxation on society, Accounting education, Accounting ethics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信