Understanding Treatment Preferences for Patients with Tricuspid Regurgitation.

IF 1.9 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
MDM Policy and Practice Pub Date : 2024-01-17 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23814683231225667
Vijay Iyer, Nadeen N Faza, Michael Pfeiffer, Mark Kozak, Brandon Peterson, Mortiz Wyler von Ballmoos, Sarah Mollenkopf, Melissa Mancilla, Diandra Latibeaudiere-Gardner, Michael J Reardon
{"title":"Understanding Treatment Preferences for Patients with Tricuspid Regurgitation.","authors":"Vijay Iyer, Nadeen N Faza, Michael Pfeiffer, Mark Kozak, Brandon Peterson, Mortiz Wyler von Ballmoos, Sarah Mollenkopf, Melissa Mancilla, Diandra Latibeaudiere-Gardner, Michael J Reardon","doi":"10.1177/23814683231225667","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background.</b> Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a high-prevalence disease associated with poor quality of life and mortality. This quantitative patient preference study aims to identify TR patients' perspectives on risk-benefit tradeoffs. <b>Methods.</b> A discrete-choice experiment was developed to explore TR treatment risk-benefit tradeoffs. Attributes (levels) tested were treatment (procedure, medical management), reintervention risk (0%, 1%, 5%, 10%), medications over 2 y (none, reduce, same, increase), shortness of breath (none/mild, moderate, severe), and swelling (never, 3× per week, daily). A mixed logit regression model estimated preferences and calculated predicted probabilities. Relative attribute importance was calculated. Subgroup analyses were performed. <b>Results.</b> An online survey was completed by 150 TR patients. Shortness of breath was the most important attribute and accounted for 65.8% of treatment decision making. The average patients' predicted probability of preferring a \"procedure-like\" profile over a \"medical management-like\" profile was 99.7%. This decreased to 78.9% for a level change from severe to moderate in shortness of breath in the \"medical management-like\" profile. Subgroup analysis confirmed that patients older than 64 y had a stronger preference to avoid severe shortness of breath compared with younger patients (<i>P</i> < 0.02), as did severe or worse TR patients relative to moderate. New York Heart Association class I/II patients more strongly preferred to avoid procedural reintervention risk relative to class III/IV patients (<i>P</i> < 0.03). <b>Conclusion.</b> TR patients are willing to accept higher procedural reintervention risk if shortness of breath is alleviated. This risk tolerance is higher for older and more symptomatic patients. These results emphasize the appropriateness of developing TR therapies and the importance of addressing symptom burden.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>This study provides quantitative patient preference data from clinically confirmed tricuspid regurgitation (TR) patients to understand their treatment preferences.Using a targeted literature search and patient, physician, and Food and Drug Administration feedback, a cross-sectional survey with a discrete-choice experiment that focused on 5 of the most important attributes to TR patients was developed and administered online.TR patients are willing to accept higher procedural reintervention risk if shortness of breath is alleviated, and this risk tolerance is higher for older and more symptomatic patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":36567,"journal":{"name":"MDM Policy and Practice","volume":"9 1","pages":"23814683231225667"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10798093/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MDM Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23814683231225667","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a high-prevalence disease associated with poor quality of life and mortality. This quantitative patient preference study aims to identify TR patients' perspectives on risk-benefit tradeoffs. Methods. A discrete-choice experiment was developed to explore TR treatment risk-benefit tradeoffs. Attributes (levels) tested were treatment (procedure, medical management), reintervention risk (0%, 1%, 5%, 10%), medications over 2 y (none, reduce, same, increase), shortness of breath (none/mild, moderate, severe), and swelling (never, 3× per week, daily). A mixed logit regression model estimated preferences and calculated predicted probabilities. Relative attribute importance was calculated. Subgroup analyses were performed. Results. An online survey was completed by 150 TR patients. Shortness of breath was the most important attribute and accounted for 65.8% of treatment decision making. The average patients' predicted probability of preferring a "procedure-like" profile over a "medical management-like" profile was 99.7%. This decreased to 78.9% for a level change from severe to moderate in shortness of breath in the "medical management-like" profile. Subgroup analysis confirmed that patients older than 64 y had a stronger preference to avoid severe shortness of breath compared with younger patients (P < 0.02), as did severe or worse TR patients relative to moderate. New York Heart Association class I/II patients more strongly preferred to avoid procedural reintervention risk relative to class III/IV patients (P < 0.03). Conclusion. TR patients are willing to accept higher procedural reintervention risk if shortness of breath is alleviated. This risk tolerance is higher for older and more symptomatic patients. These results emphasize the appropriateness of developing TR therapies and the importance of addressing symptom burden.

Highlights: This study provides quantitative patient preference data from clinically confirmed tricuspid regurgitation (TR) patients to understand their treatment preferences.Using a targeted literature search and patient, physician, and Food and Drug Administration feedback, a cross-sectional survey with a discrete-choice experiment that focused on 5 of the most important attributes to TR patients was developed and administered online.TR patients are willing to accept higher procedural reintervention risk if shortness of breath is alleviated, and this risk tolerance is higher for older and more symptomatic patients.

了解三尖瓣反流患者的治疗偏好。
背景。三尖瓣反流(TR)是一种与生活质量差和死亡率相关的高发疾病。这项患者偏好定量研究旨在确定三尖瓣反流患者对风险-收益权衡的看法。研究方法。开发了一个离散选择实验来探索 TR 治疗的风险-收益权衡。测试的属性(水平)包括治疗(手术、医疗管理)、再干预风险(0%、1%、5%、10%)、2 年内用药(无、减少、相同、增加)、呼吸急促(无/轻度、中度、重度)和浮肿(从不、每周 3 次、每天)。混合对数回归模型估计了偏好并计算了预测概率。计算了属性的相对重要性。进行了分组分析。结果150 名 TR 患者完成了在线调查。呼吸急促是最重要的属性,占治疗决策的 65.8%。与 "类似医疗管理 "的治疗方案相比,患者倾向于 "类似手术 "的治疗方案的预测概率平均为 99.7%。当 "类似医疗管理 "配置文件中的呼吸急促程度从重度变为中度时,这一概率降至 78.9%。亚组分析证实,与年轻患者相比,64 岁以上的患者更倾向于避免严重呼吸急促(P P 结论。如果呼吸急促得到缓解,TR 患者愿意接受较高的手术再介入风险。年龄较大和症状较重的患者的风险承受能力更高。这些结果强调了开发 TR 疗法的适当性以及解决症状负担的重要性:这项研究提供了临床确诊的三尖瓣反流(TR)患者的定量患者偏好数据,以了解他们对治疗的偏好。通过有针对性的文献检索以及患者、医生和食品药品管理局的反馈,我们开发了一项带有离散选择实验的横断面调查,重点关注对TR患者最重要的5个属性,并进行了在线管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
MDM Policy and Practice
MDM Policy and Practice Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信