A day in the life: Couples' everyday communication and subsequent relationship outcomes.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-22 DOI:10.1037/fam0001180
Yana Ryjova, Alaina I Gold, Adela C Timmons, Sohyun C Han, Theodora Chaspari, Corey Pettit, Yehsong Kim, Alexis Beale, Kelly F M Kazmierski, Gayla Margolin
{"title":"A day in the life: Couples' everyday communication and subsequent relationship outcomes.","authors":"Yana Ryjova, Alaina I Gold, Adela C Timmons, Sohyun C Han, Theodora Chaspari, Corey Pettit, Yehsong Kim, Alexis Beale, Kelly F M Kazmierski, Gayla Margolin","doi":"10.1037/fam0001180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Understanding how communication processes contribute to well-functioning versus distressed couple relationships has relied largely on brief, laboratory-based conversations. Harnessing technological advancements, the present study extends the literature by capturing couples' naturalistic communication over one full day at Time 1 (T1). This study tested associations between data-driven categories of couple communication behaviors and relationship outcomes (i.e., relationship aggression, satisfaction, and dissolution) at Time 2 (T2), approximately 1 year later. Emerging adults in different-gender dating couples (<i>n</i> = 106 couples; 212 individuals; <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 22.57 ± 2.44; M relationship length = 30.49 months ± 24.05; 72.2% non-White) were each provided a smartphone programmed to audio record approximately 50% of a typical day. Interactions between partners were transcribed and coded for location, activity, affect, and a range of positive and negative communication behaviors for each partner. Even after controlling for T1 assessments of the relevant outcome, one's own hostility and one's partner's hostility at T1 were each positively associated with T2 relationship aggression and negatively associated with T2 relationship satisfaction. One's own withdrawal at T1 was positively associated with T2 relationship aggression perpetration, whereas one's partner's withdrawal was negatively linked to relationship satisfaction at T2. One's own playfulness, unexpectedly, was linked to lower subsequent relationship satisfaction. Withdrawal increased the likelihood of relationship dissolution, whereas warmth and playfulness decreased the likelihood of dissolution. The relevance of couples' ordinary, everyday communication for meaningful relationship outcomes is discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10963157/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0001180","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding how communication processes contribute to well-functioning versus distressed couple relationships has relied largely on brief, laboratory-based conversations. Harnessing technological advancements, the present study extends the literature by capturing couples' naturalistic communication over one full day at Time 1 (T1). This study tested associations between data-driven categories of couple communication behaviors and relationship outcomes (i.e., relationship aggression, satisfaction, and dissolution) at Time 2 (T2), approximately 1 year later. Emerging adults in different-gender dating couples (n = 106 couples; 212 individuals; Mage = 22.57 ± 2.44; M relationship length = 30.49 months ± 24.05; 72.2% non-White) were each provided a smartphone programmed to audio record approximately 50% of a typical day. Interactions between partners were transcribed and coded for location, activity, affect, and a range of positive and negative communication behaviors for each partner. Even after controlling for T1 assessments of the relevant outcome, one's own hostility and one's partner's hostility at T1 were each positively associated with T2 relationship aggression and negatively associated with T2 relationship satisfaction. One's own withdrawal at T1 was positively associated with T2 relationship aggression perpetration, whereas one's partner's withdrawal was negatively linked to relationship satisfaction at T2. One's own playfulness, unexpectedly, was linked to lower subsequent relationship satisfaction. Withdrawal increased the likelihood of relationship dissolution, whereas warmth and playfulness decreased the likelihood of dissolution. The relevance of couples' ordinary, everyday communication for meaningful relationship outcomes is discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

生活中的一天夫妻的日常交流与后续关系结果。
要了解沟通过程是如何促进夫妻关系的良好运作与不良运作的,很大程度上依赖于简短的、基于实验室的对话。本研究利用先进的技术,通过捕捉夫妻在时间 1(T1)全天的自然交流,对文献进行了扩展。本研究在时间 2(T2),即大约 1 年后,测试了数据驱动的情侣交流行为类别与关系结果(即关系攻击、满意度和解除)之间的关联。不同性别约会情侣(n = 106 对;212 人;Mage = 22.57 ± 2.44;M relationship length = 30.49 months ± 24.05;72.2% 为非白人)中的新婚成年人每人都获得了一部智能手机,该手机可对典型一天中大约 50% 的时间进行录音。对伴侣之间的互动进行转录,并对每个伴侣的位置、活动、情感以及一系列积极和消极的交流行为进行编码。即使控制了第一阶段对相关结果的评估,第一阶段自己的敌意和伴侣的敌意仍分别与第二阶段的关系攻击正相关,与第二阶段的关系满意度负相关。自己在 T1 阶段的退缩与 T2 阶段的关系攻击行为呈正相关,而伴侣的退缩则与 T2 阶段的关系满意度呈负相关。出乎意料的是,自己的嬉戏与随后较低的关系满意度有关。退缩增加了关系解体的可能性,而温暖和游戏性则降低了关系解体的可能性。本研究讨论了夫妻间普通的日常交流与有意义的关系结果的相关性。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信