Does Spinal Surgery in Elderly Patients (Over 80 Years-Old) Lead to More Early Post-Operative Complications Than Lower Limb Prosthetic Surgery?

IF 2.1 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine Pub Date : 2024-01-16 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23337214231225841
Laura Marie-Hardy, Marc Khalifé, Raphaël Pietton, Marie-Eva Rollet, L Boissière, J Cohen-Bittan, H Pascal-Moussellard
{"title":"Does Spinal Surgery in Elderly Patients (Over 80 Years-Old) Lead to More Early Post-Operative Complications Than Lower Limb Prosthetic Surgery?","authors":"Laura Marie-Hardy, Marc Khalifé, Raphaël Pietton, Marie-Eva Rollet, L Boissière, J Cohen-Bittan, H Pascal-Moussellard","doi":"10.1177/23337214231225841","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> Patients and surgeons may be reluctant on spinal surgery over 80 years old, fearing medical complications despite the possible improvement on quality of life. However, fewer reservations for lower limb prosthetic surgery (LLPS) seem to be arisen in this population. Is spinal surgery after 80 years-old responsible of more complications than lower limb surgery? <b>Methods:</b> The consecutive files of 164 patients over 80 years that had spinal surgery or LLPS were analyzed. The data collected pre-operatively were demographic, clinical and post-operatively the number and types of medical complications and length of stay. <b>Results:</b> The mean number of medical complications was 1.11 ± 0.6 [0-6] for spinal surgery and 1.09 ± 1.0 [0-3] for LLPS, (<i>p</i> = 0,87). The length of stay in orthopedic unit was comparable between the two groups: 10.7 ± 4.9 days [2-36] for SS and 10.7 ± 3.0 days [5-11] for LLPS (<i>p</i> = 0,96). <b>Conclusion:</b> The global rate of peri-operative complications and the length of hospital stay were similar between spinal surgery and lower limb prosthetic surgery. These results may be explained by the rising cooperation between geriatric specialist and surgeons and the development of mini-invasive surgical technics, diminishing the early post-operative complication rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":52146,"journal":{"name":"Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10798125/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23337214231225841","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Patients and surgeons may be reluctant on spinal surgery over 80 years old, fearing medical complications despite the possible improvement on quality of life. However, fewer reservations for lower limb prosthetic surgery (LLPS) seem to be arisen in this population. Is spinal surgery after 80 years-old responsible of more complications than lower limb surgery? Methods: The consecutive files of 164 patients over 80 years that had spinal surgery or LLPS were analyzed. The data collected pre-operatively were demographic, clinical and post-operatively the number and types of medical complications and length of stay. Results: The mean number of medical complications was 1.11 ± 0.6 [0-6] for spinal surgery and 1.09 ± 1.0 [0-3] for LLPS, (p = 0,87). The length of stay in orthopedic unit was comparable between the two groups: 10.7 ± 4.9 days [2-36] for SS and 10.7 ± 3.0 days [5-11] for LLPS (p = 0,96). Conclusion: The global rate of peri-operative complications and the length of hospital stay were similar between spinal surgery and lower limb prosthetic surgery. These results may be explained by the rising cooperation between geriatric specialist and surgeons and the development of mini-invasive surgical technics, diminishing the early post-operative complication rates.

与下肢假体手术相比,老年患者(80 岁以上)的脊柱手术是否会导致更多早期术后并发症?
目的:80 岁以上的患者和外科医生可能不愿意接受脊柱手术,尽管手术可能会改善生活质量,但他们担心会出现医疗并发症。然而,在这一人群中,对下肢假肢手术(LLPS)的保留似乎较少。与下肢手术相比,80 岁以后的脊柱手术是否会引起更多并发症?研究方法:对 164 名 80 岁以上接受脊柱手术或下肢假体手术的患者的连续档案进行分析。术前收集的数据包括人口统计学、临床和术后医疗并发症的数量和类型以及住院时间。结果显示脊柱手术医疗并发症的平均数量为 1.11 ± 0.6 [0-6],LLPS 为 1.09 ± 1.0 [0-3],(P = 0,87)。两组患者在骨科病房的住院时间相当:SS 为 10.7 ± 4.9 天 [2-36] ,LLPS 为 10.7 ± 3.0 天 [5-11](P = 0,96)。结论脊柱手术和下肢假体手术的围手术期并发症总发生率和住院时间相似。这些结果可能是由于老年病专科医生和外科医生之间的合作日益密切,以及微创手术技术的发展,从而降低了术后早期并发症的发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine
Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine Medicine-Geriatrics and Gerontology
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
3.70%
发文量
119
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine (GGM) is an interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed open access journal where scholars from a variety of disciplines present their work focusing on the psychological, behavioral, social, and biological aspects of aging, and public health services and research related to aging. The journal addresses a wide variety of topics related to health services research in gerontology and geriatrics. GGM seeks to be one of the world’s premier Open Access outlets for gerontological academic research. As such, GGM does not limit content due to page budgets or thematic significance. Papers will be subjected to rigorous peer review but will be selected solely on the basis of whether the research is sound and deserves publication. By virtue of not restricting papers to a narrow discipline, GGM facilitates the discovery of the connections between papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信