Diffusion Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Spinal Cord Injuries After Instrumented Fusion Stabilization.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of neurotrauma Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-10 DOI:10.1089/neu.2023.0591
Kevin M Koch, Andrew S Nencka, Shekar Kurpad, Matthew D Budde
{"title":"Diffusion Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Spinal Cord Injuries After Instrumented Fusion Stabilization.","authors":"Kevin M Koch, Andrew S Nencka, Shekar Kurpad, Matthew D Budde","doi":"10.1089/neu.2023.0591","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) is a promising technique for assessing spinal cord injury (SCI) that has historically been challenged by the presence of metallic stabilization hardware. This study leverages recent advances in metal-artifact resistant multi-spectral DW-MRI to enable diffusion quantification throughout the spinal cord even after fusion stabilization. Twelve participants with cervical spinal cord injuries treated with fusion stabilization and 49 asymptomatic able-bodied control participants underwent multi-spectral DW-MRI evaluation. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were calculated in axial cord sections. Statistical modeling assessed ADC differences across cohorts and within distinct cord regions of the SCI participants (at, above, or below injured level). Computed models accounted for subject demographics and injury characteristics. ADC was found to be elevated at injured levels compared with non-injured levels (z = 3.2, <i>p</i> = 0.001), with ADC at injured levels decreasing over time since injury (z = -9.2, <i>p <</i> 0.001). Below the injury level, ADC was reduced relative to controls (z = -4.4, <i>p <</i> 0.001), with greater reductions after more severe injuries that correlated with lower extremity motor scores (z = 2.56, <i>p</i> = 0.012). No statistically significant differences in ADC above the level of injury were identified. By enabling diffusion analysis near fusion hardware, the multi-spectral DW-MRI technique allowed intuitive quantification of cord diffusion changes after SCI both at and away from injured levels. This demonstrates the approach's potential for assessing post-surgical spinal cord integrity throughout stabilized regions.</p>","PeriodicalId":16512,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurotrauma","volume":" ","pages":"2125-2132"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurotrauma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2023.0591","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) is a promising technique for assessing spinal cord injury (SCI) that has historically been challenged by the presence of metallic stabilization hardware. This study leverages recent advances in metal-artifact resistant multi-spectral DW-MRI to enable diffusion quantification throughout the spinal cord even after fusion stabilization. Twelve participants with cervical spinal cord injuries treated with fusion stabilization and 49 asymptomatic able-bodied control participants underwent multi-spectral DW-MRI evaluation. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were calculated in axial cord sections. Statistical modeling assessed ADC differences across cohorts and within distinct cord regions of the SCI participants (at, above, or below injured level). Computed models accounted for subject demographics and injury characteristics. ADC was found to be elevated at injured levels compared with non-injured levels (z = 3.2, p = 0.001), with ADC at injured levels decreasing over time since injury (z = -9.2, p < 0.001). Below the injury level, ADC was reduced relative to controls (z = -4.4, p < 0.001), with greater reductions after more severe injuries that correlated with lower extremity motor scores (z = 2.56, p = 0.012). No statistically significant differences in ADC above the level of injury were identified. By enabling diffusion analysis near fusion hardware, the multi-spectral DW-MRI technique allowed intuitive quantification of cord diffusion changes after SCI both at and away from injured levels. This demonstrates the approach's potential for assessing post-surgical spinal cord integrity throughout stabilized regions.

器械融合稳定术后脊髓损伤的弥散加权核磁共振成像。
弥散加权磁共振成像(DW-MRI)是一种很有前景的脊髓损伤评估技术,但一直以来都受到金属稳定硬件的挑战。本研究利用抗金属赝象多光谱 DW-MRI 的最新进展,即使在融合稳定后也能对整个脊髓进行弥散量化。12 名接受过融合稳定治疗的颈椎脊髓损伤患者和 49 名无症状对照组患者接受了多谱段 DW-MRI 评估。计算了轴向脊髓切片的表观扩散系数(ADC)值。统计建模评估了 SCI 受试者不同组群和不同脊髓区域(损伤水平、损伤水平以上或以下)的 ADC 差异。计算模型考虑了受试者的人口统计学特征和损伤特征。结果发现,与未受伤水平相比,受伤水平的 ADC 升高(z=3.2,p = 0.001),受伤水平的 ADC 随受伤时间的推移而降低(z=-9.2,p = 0.001)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of neurotrauma
Journal of neurotrauma 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
233
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Neurotrauma is the flagship, peer-reviewed publication for reporting on the latest advances in both the clinical and laboratory investigation of traumatic brain and spinal cord injury. The Journal focuses on the basic pathobiology of injury to the central nervous system, while considering preclinical and clinical trials targeted at improving both the early management and long-term care and recovery of traumatically injured patients. This is the essential journal publishing cutting-edge basic and translational research in traumatically injured human and animal studies, with emphasis on neurodegenerative disease research linked to CNS trauma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信