Safety, risk stratification, and cost of ERCP in patients with cirrhosis: a prospective controlled study

IF 0.8 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Ahmed Attia
{"title":"Safety, risk stratification, and cost of ERCP in patients with cirrhosis: a prospective controlled study","authors":"Ahmed Attia","doi":"10.1186/s43066-024-00311-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Given that ERCP has major procedure-related complications in non-cirrhotic patients, the complications and the cost of therapeutic ERCP were not studied in cirrhotic patients. We aimed to study the complications and cost of ERCP compared to patients without cirrhosis. Outcome and complications of therapeutic ERCP were prospectively studied in patients with cirrhosis and compared to patients without cirrhosis undergoing ERCP. Patients with cirrhosis were evaluated using the Child-Pugh classification, MELD, MELD Na, and APRI scores. Safety was assessed up to 30 days following the procedure. Pancreatitis, perforation, bleeding, and cardiopulmonary complications were not different in both groups (8% vs. 9.3, 0% vs. 2%, 3.3% vs. 4%, and 4% vs. 2% respectively), while cholangitis occurred more frequently in cirrhosis (13.3% vs. 1.3% respectively). Hospital stay was longer, and mortality and costs were significantly higher among patients with cirrhosis. Patients with Child C cirrhosis developed more complications and had higher mortality. A MELD score cut-off of ≥ 11.5 separated all mortalities. Similarly, MELD-Na and APRI separated patients with cirrhosis who had more frequent complications and mortalities. Patients with cirrhosis experienced more complications and costs, and cirrhotic patients who developed moderate to severe complications were more likely to die.","PeriodicalId":11620,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Liver Journal","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Liver Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43066-024-00311-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Given that ERCP has major procedure-related complications in non-cirrhotic patients, the complications and the cost of therapeutic ERCP were not studied in cirrhotic patients. We aimed to study the complications and cost of ERCP compared to patients without cirrhosis. Outcome and complications of therapeutic ERCP were prospectively studied in patients with cirrhosis and compared to patients without cirrhosis undergoing ERCP. Patients with cirrhosis were evaluated using the Child-Pugh classification, MELD, MELD Na, and APRI scores. Safety was assessed up to 30 days following the procedure. Pancreatitis, perforation, bleeding, and cardiopulmonary complications were not different in both groups (8% vs. 9.3, 0% vs. 2%, 3.3% vs. 4%, and 4% vs. 2% respectively), while cholangitis occurred more frequently in cirrhosis (13.3% vs. 1.3% respectively). Hospital stay was longer, and mortality and costs were significantly higher among patients with cirrhosis. Patients with Child C cirrhosis developed more complications and had higher mortality. A MELD score cut-off of ≥ 11.5 separated all mortalities. Similarly, MELD-Na and APRI separated patients with cirrhosis who had more frequent complications and mortalities. Patients with cirrhosis experienced more complications and costs, and cirrhotic patients who developed moderate to severe complications were more likely to die.
肝硬化患者ERCP的安全性、风险分层和成本:一项前瞻性对照研究
鉴于ERCP在非肝硬化患者中会出现与手术相关的主要并发症,因此未对肝硬化患者治疗性ERCP的并发症和费用进行研究。我们旨在研究与非肝硬化患者相比,ERCP 的并发症和费用。我们对肝硬化患者ERCP的治疗效果和并发症进行了前瞻性研究,并与接受ERCP的非肝硬化患者进行了比较。采用Child-Pugh分类、MELD、MELD Na和APRI评分对肝硬化患者进行评估。安全性评估持续到术后 30 天。两组患者的胰腺炎、穿孔、出血和心肺并发症没有差异(分别为8% vs. 9.3%、0% vs. 2%、3.3% vs. 4%和4% vs. 2%),而肝硬化患者的胆管炎发生率更高(分别为13.3% vs. 1.3%)。肝硬化患者的住院时间更长,死亡率和费用明显更高。Child C 肝硬化患者出现的并发症更多,死亡率更高。MELD 评分≥ 11.5 的分界点将所有死亡率区分开来。同样,MELD-Na 和 APRI 将并发症和死亡率更高的肝硬化患者区分开来。肝硬化患者经历的并发症和花费更多,出现中度至重度并发症的肝硬化患者更有可能死亡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Egyptian Liver Journal
Egyptian Liver Journal Medicine-Hepatology
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
60
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信