Effects of under-forest economic activities on soil water repellency, soil hydraulic properties and preferential flow in karst forests

IF 2.7 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Yao Li, Dongdong Liu
{"title":"Effects of under-forest economic activities on soil water repellency, soil hydraulic properties and preferential flow in karst forests","authors":"Yao Li,&nbsp;Dongdong Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.ecohyd.2023.12.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span><span><span>The effects of under-forest economic activities (UFE) on soil water repellency, </span>soil hydraulic properties and </span>preferential flow pathways of karst forest soils are not fully understood. To investigate these effects, the soil physical-chemical properties including </span>soil penetration resistance<span>, surface shear strength and soil water repellency, as well as saturated hydraulic conductivity (</span></span><em>K<sub>s</sub></em><span>) and soil water retention curves (</span><em>SWRCs</em><span>) at depths of 0–20, 20–40, and 40–60 cm were compared between undisturbed soils affected by human trampling on forest trails formed by UFE. Disk tension infiltrometers<span> and dye tracing experiments were also conducted to quantify the effects of UFE on the field hydraulic properties and preferential flow pathways from the center of forest trails (CF), the edge of forest trails (EF), and undisturbed forestlands (FL). Our results showed that the forest trails formed by under-forest economic activities enhanced water repellency to various degrees. The </span></span><em>K<sub>s</sub></em> of CF (37.03 mm h<sup>−1</sup>) was significantly lower than that of FL (115.29 mm h<sup>−1</sup>). The <em>SWRC</em> slopes were steeper for the CF and the EF compared to the FL in the 0–20 cm, 20–40 cm and 40–60 cm intervals, and significant differences in van Genuchten model parameters (<em>α, n, m, θ<sub>r</sub></em>, and <em>θ<sub>s</sub>)</em> in the 0–20 cm layer confirm that <em>SWRCs</em> were largely influenced by forest trail. In addition, the averaged preferential flow fraction (<em>PF-fr</em>) was significantly higher for CF and EF compared to FL, while the dye coverage (<em>DC</em>) and uniform infiltration depths (<em>UniFr</em><span>) were significantly lower. These results indicated that preferential flow is largely enhanced by the UFE. This study provides a field-based case study illustrating the negative effects of UFE on land development and degradation.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":56070,"journal":{"name":"Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology","volume":"24 1","pages":"Pages 128-153"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1642359323001490","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The effects of under-forest economic activities (UFE) on soil water repellency, soil hydraulic properties and preferential flow pathways of karst forest soils are not fully understood. To investigate these effects, the soil physical-chemical properties including soil penetration resistance, surface shear strength and soil water repellency, as well as saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ks) and soil water retention curves (SWRCs) at depths of 0–20, 20–40, and 40–60 cm were compared between undisturbed soils affected by human trampling on forest trails formed by UFE. Disk tension infiltrometers and dye tracing experiments were also conducted to quantify the effects of UFE on the field hydraulic properties and preferential flow pathways from the center of forest trails (CF), the edge of forest trails (EF), and undisturbed forestlands (FL). Our results showed that the forest trails formed by under-forest economic activities enhanced water repellency to various degrees. The Ks of CF (37.03 mm h−1) was significantly lower than that of FL (115.29 mm h−1). The SWRC slopes were steeper for the CF and the EF compared to the FL in the 0–20 cm, 20–40 cm and 40–60 cm intervals, and significant differences in van Genuchten model parameters (α, n, m, θr, and θs) in the 0–20 cm layer confirm that SWRCs were largely influenced by forest trail. In addition, the averaged preferential flow fraction (PF-fr) was significantly higher for CF and EF compared to FL, while the dye coverage (DC) and uniform infiltration depths (UniFr) were significantly lower. These results indicated that preferential flow is largely enhanced by the UFE. This study provides a field-based case study illustrating the negative effects of UFE on land development and degradation.

林下经济活动对喀斯特森林土壤斥水性、土壤水力特性和优先流的影响
林下经济活动(UFE)对岩溶森林土壤的土壤憎水性、土壤水力特性和优先流动路径的影响尚未完全明了。为了研究这些影响,研究人员比较了受人类践踏影响的未扰动土壤与林下经济活动形成的森林小径上 0-20、20-40 和 40-60 厘米深度的土壤物理化学性质,包括土壤渗透阻力、表面剪切强度和土壤憎水性,以及饱和导水性(Ks)和土壤水分保持曲线(SWRCs)。此外,还进行了盘式张力渗透仪和染料追踪实验,以量化 UFE 对森林迹地中心(CF)、森林迹地边缘(EF)和未受干扰林地(FL)的实地水力特性和优先流径的影响。结果表明,林下经济活动形成的森林迹地在不同程度上增强了拒水性。CF 的 Ks(37.03 mm h-1)明显低于 FL(115.29 mm h-1)。与 FL 相比,CF 和 EF 在 0-20 cm、20-40 cm 和 40-60 cm 层间的 SWRC 坡度更陡,0-20 cm 层间范-格努赫腾模型参数(α、n、m、θr 和 θs)的显著差异证实了 SWRC 在很大程度上受森林迹地的影响。此外,与 FL 相比,CF 和 EF 的平均优先流分数(PF-fr)明显较高,而染色覆盖率(DC)和均匀渗透深度(UniFr)则明显较低。这些结果表明,UFE 在很大程度上增强了优先流。本研究提供了一个基于实地的案例研究,说明了超滤对土地开发和退化的负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology
Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Aquatic Science
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.80%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology is an international journal that aims to advance ecohydrology as the study of the interplay between ecological and hydrological processes from molecular to river basin scales, and to promote its implementation as an integrative management tool to harmonize societal needs with biosphere potential.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信