Supplementary comparison SIM.M.FF-S9.2016 for water flow measurement

IF 2.1 3区 工程技术 Q2 INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION
E Frahm, R Arias, M Maldonado, J Vargas, J J Mendoza, A Arredondo, M A Silvosa
{"title":"Supplementary comparison SIM.M.FF-S9.2016 for water flow measurement","authors":"E Frahm, R Arias, M Maldonado, J Vargas, J J Mendoza, A Arredondo, M A Silvosa","doi":"10.1088/0026-1394/61/1a/07001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<title>Main text</title>The objective of the Supplementary Comparison (SC) SIM.M.FF-S9 for water flow measurement was to support and prove the Calibration and Measurement Capabilities (CMC) of the participating NMIs of Chile (CISA), Peru (INACAL), Bolivia (IBMETRO) and Argentina (INTI). As pilot laboratories, the national metrology institutes of Germany (PTB) and CENAM (Mexico) supported the comparison with reference values. The comparison was organized as a single round robin, started in January 2016 at PTB and finished in August 2019, also at PTB. A combined setup of a turbine meter and Coriolis meter was used as a transfer standard. The nominal calibration conditions of the SC were defined in the flow range between 10 m<sup>3</sup>/h and 130 m<sup>3</sup>/h, 20 °C fluid temperature and 0.3 MPa line pressure. In order to estimate the uncertainties <italic toggle=\"yes\">u</italic>\n<sub>TS</sub>, both transfer meters were subjected to extensive characterization measurements at pilot laboratory PTB. The following parameters were researched in detail: fluid temperature, line pressure, reproducibility, flow stability and meter sensitivity to different inflow conditions. The <italic toggle=\"yes\">E</italic>\n<sub>N</sub> values for the turbine meter were calculated based on PTB data, only. The <italic toggle=\"yes\">E</italic>\n<sub>N</sub> values for the Coriolis meter are partly linked to Key Comparison CCM.FF-K1.2015 and were calculated using a common reference value of PTB and CENAM data. The uncertainty of turbine meter <italic toggle=\"yes\">u</italic>\n<sub>TS</sub> was clearly dominated by the sensitivity to disturbed inflow conditions which leads to large values of <italic toggle=\"yes\">u</italic>\n<sub>TS</sub> with &gt; 0.20 %. Beside one calibration, all labs passed the <italic toggle=\"yes\">E</italic>\n<sub>N</sub> criteria of ≤ 1.20. But, due to large values of <italic toggle=\"yes\">u</italic>\n<sub>TS</sub>, the calibrations for all labs were evaluated as inconclusive. The evaluation criteria <italic toggle=\"yes\">u</italic>\n<sub>comp</sub>/<italic toggle=\"yes\">u</italic>\n<sub>base</sub> exceeded the critical value of 2.00 for all calibrations. Finally, the turbine meter was not suitable for a confirmation of the submitted CMC values. The calibration results of the Coriolis meter were characterized by a strong dependency on zero setting. The observed effect was adjusted for the data of both reference laboratories by introducing a new method for autozero correction. Maximum uncertainty values for Coriolis <italic toggle=\"yes\">u</italic>\n<sub>TS</sub> were estimated with 0.069 % at low flowrates and 0.033 % at high flowrates. Besides two calibrations, all laboratories complied with the <italic toggle=\"yes\">E</italic>\n<sub>N</sub> criteria of ≤ 1.20. In contrast to turbine meter, the evaluation criteria <italic toggle=\"yes\">u</italic>\n<sub>comp</sub>/<italic toggle=\"yes\">u</italic>\n<sub>base</sub> exceeded the critical value of 2.00 at one calibration, only. In consequence, the calibrations by using the Coriolis meter were suitable for a confirmation of the submitted CMC values. In summary, the comparison was successfully finished for a confirmation of the submitted CMC values, related to mass calibrations. For volume related CMCs this comparison was not suitable.The comparison was partially financially supported by the German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ) - PNs: 2012.2296.7-95259, 2015.2037.8-95306 and 2017.2073.9-95328.To reach the main text of this paper, click on <ext-link xlink:href=\"https://www.bipm.org/documents/d/guest/sim-m-ff-s9\" xlink:type=\"simple\">Final Report</ext-link>. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database <ext-link xlink:href=\"https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/\" xlink:type=\"simple\">https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/</ext-link>.The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCM, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).","PeriodicalId":18444,"journal":{"name":"Metrologia","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Metrologia","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/61/1a/07001","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Main textThe objective of the Supplementary Comparison (SC) SIM.M.FF-S9 for water flow measurement was to support and prove the Calibration and Measurement Capabilities (CMC) of the participating NMIs of Chile (CISA), Peru (INACAL), Bolivia (IBMETRO) and Argentina (INTI). As pilot laboratories, the national metrology institutes of Germany (PTB) and CENAM (Mexico) supported the comparison with reference values. The comparison was organized as a single round robin, started in January 2016 at PTB and finished in August 2019, also at PTB. A combined setup of a turbine meter and Coriolis meter was used as a transfer standard. The nominal calibration conditions of the SC were defined in the flow range between 10 m3/h and 130 m3/h, 20 °C fluid temperature and 0.3 MPa line pressure. In order to estimate the uncertainties u TS, both transfer meters were subjected to extensive characterization measurements at pilot laboratory PTB. The following parameters were researched in detail: fluid temperature, line pressure, reproducibility, flow stability and meter sensitivity to different inflow conditions. The E N values for the turbine meter were calculated based on PTB data, only. The E N values for the Coriolis meter are partly linked to Key Comparison CCM.FF-K1.2015 and were calculated using a common reference value of PTB and CENAM data. The uncertainty of turbine meter u TS was clearly dominated by the sensitivity to disturbed inflow conditions which leads to large values of u TS with > 0.20 %. Beside one calibration, all labs passed the E N criteria of ≤ 1.20. But, due to large values of u TS, the calibrations for all labs were evaluated as inconclusive. The evaluation criteria u comp/u base exceeded the critical value of 2.00 for all calibrations. Finally, the turbine meter was not suitable for a confirmation of the submitted CMC values. The calibration results of the Coriolis meter were characterized by a strong dependency on zero setting. The observed effect was adjusted for the data of both reference laboratories by introducing a new method for autozero correction. Maximum uncertainty values for Coriolis u TS were estimated with 0.069 % at low flowrates and 0.033 % at high flowrates. Besides two calibrations, all laboratories complied with the E N criteria of ≤ 1.20. In contrast to turbine meter, the evaluation criteria u comp/u base exceeded the critical value of 2.00 at one calibration, only. In consequence, the calibrations by using the Coriolis meter were suitable for a confirmation of the submitted CMC values. In summary, the comparison was successfully finished for a confirmation of the submitted CMC values, related to mass calibrations. For volume related CMCs this comparison was not suitable.The comparison was partially financially supported by the German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ) - PNs: 2012.2296.7-95259, 2015.2037.8-95306 and 2017.2073.9-95328.To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/.The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCM, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).
用于水流量测量的补充比较 SIM.M.FF-S9.2016
正文用于水流量测量的补充比对(SC)SIM.M.FF-S9 的目的是支持和证明智利(CISA)、秘鲁(INACAL)、玻利维亚(IBMETRO)和阿根廷(INTI)参与的国家计量院的校准和测量能力(CMC)。作为试点实验室,德国(PTB)和墨西哥(CENAM)的国家计量机构为参考值比对提供了支持。比对以单循环方式进行,于 2016 年 1 月在 PTB 开始,2019 年 8 月在 PTB 结束。涡轮流量计和科里奥利流量计的组合装置被用作转移标准。SC 的标称校准条件定义在 10 m3/h 至 130 m3/h 的流量范围、20 °C 流体温度和 0.3 MPa 管线压力之间。为了估算不确定度 uTS,两个流量计都在试验实验室 PTB 进行了广泛的特性测量。对以下参数进行了详细研究:流体温度、管线压力、再现性、流量稳定性以及流量计对不同流入条件的敏感性。涡轮流量计的 EN 值仅根据 PTB 数据计算得出。科里奥利流量计的 EN 值部分与关键比较值 CCM.FF-K1.2015 相关联,并使用 PTB 和 CENAM 数据的共同参考值进行计算。涡轮流量计 uTS 的不确定性显然主要取决于对扰动水流条件的敏感性,这导致 uTS 值较大,达到 > 0.20 %。除了一次校准外,所有实验室都通过了 EN 标准的 ≤ 1.20。但是,由于 uTS 值过大,所有实验室的校准都被评为不合格。所有校准的评估标准 ucomp/ubase 都超过了临界值 2.00。最后,涡轮流量计不适合确认提交的 CMC 值。科里奥利计的校准结果与零点设置有很大关系。通过采用新的自动归零校正方法,对两个参考实验室的数据进行了调整。科里奥利 UTS 的最大不确定值在低流速时为 0.069 %,在高流速时为 0.033 %。除两次校准外,所有实验室均符合 EN 标准 ≤ 1.20。与涡轮流量计相反,评估标准 ucomp/ubase 仅在一次校准中超过临界值 2.00。因此,科里奥利计的校准适用于确认提交的 CMC 值。总之,这次比较成功地确认了提交的与质量校准有关的 CMC 值。本次比对得到了德国联邦经济合作与发展部 (BMZ) 的部分资金支持 - PNs:2012.2296.7-95259、2015.2037.8-95306 和 2017.2073.9-95328.要阅读本文正文,请点击最终报告。请注意,此文本为 BIPM 关键比对数据库附录 B 中的文本 https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/.The 根据 CIPM 互认安排(CIPM MRA)的规定,最终报告已通过同行评审,并批准由 CCM 出版。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Metrologia
Metrologia 工程技术-物理:应用
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
25.00%
发文量
137
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Published 6 times per year, Metrologia covers the fundamentals of measurements, particularly those dealing with the seven base units of the International System of Units (metre, kilogram, second, ampere, kelvin, candela, mole) or proposals to replace them. The journal also publishes papers that contribute to the solution of difficult measurement problems and improve the accuracy of derived units and constants that are of fundamental importance to physics. In addition to regular papers, the journal publishes review articles, issues devoted to single topics of timely interest and occasional conference proceedings. Letters to the Editor and Short Communications (generally three pages or less) are also considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信