A review of the necessity of a multi-layer land-use planning

IF 1.7 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Hashem Dadashpoor, Leyla Ghasempour
{"title":"A review of the necessity of a multi-layer land-use planning","authors":"Hashem Dadashpoor, Leyla Ghasempour","doi":"10.1007/s11355-023-00584-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Since its inception, land-use planning (LUP) has faced many challenges; most of these challenges have been due to the incompatibility of LUP with multi-layer situations. Lack of adaptability in planning has led to increased social conflicts and many environmental issues, especially in global southern countries. Paying attention to the context in which LUP takes place is necessary to adapt to the nonlinear land-use changes. LUP theories have formed two general processes including top-down (comprehensive planning) and bottom-up (collaborative planning) processes to influence land use. However, the processes that shape the transformations of land uses are more sophisticated than being placed in this or that theory. Land-use transformations are rooted in contextual conditions that are shaped by the mutual interactions of social structures and power relations at different spatial levels which are different for each society. This research explores the challenges of the incompatibility of LUP general processes with contextual conditions. The study reviews the compliance of contextual conditions with the LUP main elements, including cognition, decision-making process, goal setting, and policy selection. The results showed that LUP to comply with the multi-layer nature of various situations needs a continuous connection of its elements. Efficient knowledge of changing forces enables planning adaptability and flexibility. This knowledge provides the opportunity to redefine the decision-making process. This research can be the triggering point for LUP to comply with different conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":49920,"journal":{"name":"Landscape and Ecological Engineering","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Landscape and Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11355-023-00584-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since its inception, land-use planning (LUP) has faced many challenges; most of these challenges have been due to the incompatibility of LUP with multi-layer situations. Lack of adaptability in planning has led to increased social conflicts and many environmental issues, especially in global southern countries. Paying attention to the context in which LUP takes place is necessary to adapt to the nonlinear land-use changes. LUP theories have formed two general processes including top-down (comprehensive planning) and bottom-up (collaborative planning) processes to influence land use. However, the processes that shape the transformations of land uses are more sophisticated than being placed in this or that theory. Land-use transformations are rooted in contextual conditions that are shaped by the mutual interactions of social structures and power relations at different spatial levels which are different for each society. This research explores the challenges of the incompatibility of LUP general processes with contextual conditions. The study reviews the compliance of contextual conditions with the LUP main elements, including cognition, decision-making process, goal setting, and policy selection. The results showed that LUP to comply with the multi-layer nature of various situations needs a continuous connection of its elements. Efficient knowledge of changing forces enables planning adaptability and flexibility. This knowledge provides the opportunity to redefine the decision-making process. This research can be the triggering point for LUP to comply with different conditions.

Abstract Image

对多层次土地利用规划必要性的审查
土地利用规划(LUP)自诞生以来就面临着许多挑战,其中大多数挑战都是由于土地利用规划与多层次情况不相适应造成的。规划缺乏适应性导致了社会冲突的增加和许多环境问题,尤其是在全球南方国家。要适应土地利用的非线性变化,就必须关注土地利用政策的实施背景。土地利用政策理论形成了两种影响土地利用的一般过程,包括自上而下(全面规划)和自下而上(协作规划)的过程。然而,形成土地用途转变的过程比将其归入这种或那种理论更为复杂。土地利用的转变源于社会结构和权力关系在不同空间层次上的相互作用所形成的背景条件,而每个社会的背景条件都不尽相同。本研究探讨了土地利用政策一般程序与背景条件不相容的挑战。研究回顾了环境条件与 LUP 主要要素的一致性,包括认知、决策过程、目标设定和政策选择。研究结果表明,要使 LUP 符合各种情况的多层次性,需要将其各要素持续联系起来。有效了解各种力量的变化,可以提高规划的适应性和灵活性。这些知识为重新定义决策过程提供了机会。这项研究可以成为土地利用政策适应不同情况的触发点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Landscape and Ecological Engineering
Landscape and Ecological Engineering BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION-ECOLOGY
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Landscape and Ecological Engineering is published by the International Consortium of Landscape and Ecological Engineering (ICLEE) in the interests of protecting and improving the environment in the face of biodiversity loss, desertification, global warming, and other environmental conditions. The journal invites original papers, reports, reviews and technical notes on all aspects of conservation, restoration, and management of ecosystems. It is not limited to purely scientific approaches, but welcomes technological and design approaches that provide useful and practical solutions to today''s environmental problems. The journal''s coverage is relevant to universities and research institutes, while its emphasis on the practical application of research will be important to all decision makers dealing with landscape planning and management problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信