Editorial Commentary: MRI May Underestimate Hip Femoral Version Versus CT Scan: Both May Be Optimized Using 3-Dimensional Imaging

Jay Moran, Andrew E. Jimenez
{"title":"Editorial Commentary: MRI May Underestimate Hip Femoral Version Versus CT Scan: Both May Be Optimized Using 3-Dimensional Imaging","authors":"Jay Moran, Andrew E. Jimenez","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2024.01.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Hip arthroscopy has become increasingly popular in the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAI). Careful preoperative planning including evaluation of acetabular and femoral version, is necessary to optimize outcomes. Increased femoral anteversion has been associated with microinstability, and conversely, decreased femoral version may predispose to impingement. Computed tomography (CT) is considered the “gold standard” for femoral version measurements and preoperative planning. However, recent advancements in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technologies have demonstrated comparable measurements to CT imaging. In terms of advantages and disadvantages, CT requires radiation, albeit “low dose.” MRI has longer acquisition time, and movement of the patient may impact image quality and subsequent accuracy. MRI generally underestimates true version, probably as a result of patient positioning. 3D imaging could resolve this issue and may become the gold-standard for both CT and MRI.</p>","PeriodicalId":501029,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2024.01.011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hip arthroscopy has become increasingly popular in the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAI). Careful preoperative planning including evaluation of acetabular and femoral version, is necessary to optimize outcomes. Increased femoral anteversion has been associated with microinstability, and conversely, decreased femoral version may predispose to impingement. Computed tomography (CT) is considered the “gold standard” for femoral version measurements and preoperative planning. However, recent advancements in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technologies have demonstrated comparable measurements to CT imaging. In terms of advantages and disadvantages, CT requires radiation, albeit “low dose.” MRI has longer acquisition time, and movement of the patient may impact image quality and subsequent accuracy. MRI generally underestimates true version, probably as a result of patient positioning. 3D imaging could resolve this issue and may become the gold-standard for both CT and MRI.

社论评论:核磁共振成像与 CT 扫描相比可能低估了髋关节股骨形态:二者均可通过三维成像进行优化
髋关节镜在治疗股骨髋臼撞击综合征(FAI)方面越来越受欢迎。谨慎的术前规划,包括评估髋臼和股骨的内翻,对于优化治疗效果非常必要。股骨内翻增加与微稳定性有关,反之,股骨内翻减少则可能导致撞击。计算机断层扫描(CT)被认为是股骨长度测量和术前规划的 "黄金标准"。然而,磁共振成像(MRI)技术的最新进展表明,其测量结果与CT成像结果不相上下。就优缺点而言,CT 需要辐射,尽管是 "低剂量"。磁共振成像的采集时间较长,病人的移动可能会影响图像质量和随后的准确性。核磁共振成像通常会低估真实尺寸,这可能是患者定位的结果。三维成像可以解决这个问题,并可能成为 CT 和 MRI 的黄金标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信