Pain-sensorimotor interactions: New perspectives and a new model

Q2 Medicine
Greg M. Murray , Barry J. Sessle
{"title":"Pain-sensorimotor interactions: New perspectives and a new model","authors":"Greg M. Murray ,&nbsp;Barry J. Sessle","doi":"10.1016/j.ynpai.2024.100150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>How pain and sensorimotor behavior interact has been the subject of research and debate for many decades. This article reviews theories bearing on pain-sensorimotor interactions and considers their strengths and limitations in the light of findings from experimental and clinical studies of pain-sensorimotor interactions in the spinal and craniofacial sensorimotor systems. A strength of recent theories is that they have incorporated concepts and features missing from earlier theories to account for the role of the sensory-discriminative, motivational-affective, and cognitive-evaluative dimensions of pain in pain-sensorimotor interactions. Findings acquired since the formulation of these recent theories indicate that additional features need to be considered to provide a more comprehensive conceptualization of pain-sensorimotor interactions. These features include biopsychosocial influences that range from biological factors such as genetics and epigenetics to psychological factors and social factors encompassing environmental and cultural influences. Also needing consideration is a mechanistic framework that includes other biological factors reflecting nociceptive processes and glioplastic and neuroplastic changes in sensorimotor and related brain and spinal cord circuits in acute or chronic pain conditions. The literature reviewed and the limitations of previous theories bearing on pain-sensorimotor interactions have led us to provide new perspectives on these interactions, and this has prompted our development of a new concept, the Theory of Pain-Sensorimotor Interactions (TOPSMI) that we suggest gives a more comprehensive framework to consider the interactions and their complexity. This theory states that <strong><em>pain is associated with plastic changes in the central nervous system (CNS) that lead to an activation pattern of motor units that contributes to the individual’s adaptive sensorimotor behavior. This activation pattern takes account of the biological, psychological, and social influences on the musculoskeletal tissues involved in sensorimotor behavior and on the plastic changes and the experience of pain in that individual. The pattern is normally optimized in terms of biomechanical advantage and metabolic cost related to the features of the individual’s musculoskeletal tissues and aims to minimize pain and any associated sensorimotor changes, and thereby maintain homeostasis. However, adverse biopsychosocial factors and their interactions may result in plastic CNS changes leading to less optimal, even maladaptive, sensorimotor changes producing motor unit activation patterns associated with the development of further pain.</em></strong> This more comprehensive theory points towards customized treatment strategies, in line with the management approaches to pain proposed in the biopsychosocial model of pain.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52177,"journal":{"name":"Neurobiology of Pain","volume":"15 ","pages":"Article 100150"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452073X24000011/pdfft?md5=7c27b7d26972c1b32b2102ac81886c3d&pid=1-s2.0-S2452073X24000011-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurobiology of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452073X24000011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

How pain and sensorimotor behavior interact has been the subject of research and debate for many decades. This article reviews theories bearing on pain-sensorimotor interactions and considers their strengths and limitations in the light of findings from experimental and clinical studies of pain-sensorimotor interactions in the spinal and craniofacial sensorimotor systems. A strength of recent theories is that they have incorporated concepts and features missing from earlier theories to account for the role of the sensory-discriminative, motivational-affective, and cognitive-evaluative dimensions of pain in pain-sensorimotor interactions. Findings acquired since the formulation of these recent theories indicate that additional features need to be considered to provide a more comprehensive conceptualization of pain-sensorimotor interactions. These features include biopsychosocial influences that range from biological factors such as genetics and epigenetics to psychological factors and social factors encompassing environmental and cultural influences. Also needing consideration is a mechanistic framework that includes other biological factors reflecting nociceptive processes and glioplastic and neuroplastic changes in sensorimotor and related brain and spinal cord circuits in acute or chronic pain conditions. The literature reviewed and the limitations of previous theories bearing on pain-sensorimotor interactions have led us to provide new perspectives on these interactions, and this has prompted our development of a new concept, the Theory of Pain-Sensorimotor Interactions (TOPSMI) that we suggest gives a more comprehensive framework to consider the interactions and their complexity. This theory states that pain is associated with plastic changes in the central nervous system (CNS) that lead to an activation pattern of motor units that contributes to the individual’s adaptive sensorimotor behavior. This activation pattern takes account of the biological, psychological, and social influences on the musculoskeletal tissues involved in sensorimotor behavior and on the plastic changes and the experience of pain in that individual. The pattern is normally optimized in terms of biomechanical advantage and metabolic cost related to the features of the individual’s musculoskeletal tissues and aims to minimize pain and any associated sensorimotor changes, and thereby maintain homeostasis. However, adverse biopsychosocial factors and their interactions may result in plastic CNS changes leading to less optimal, even maladaptive, sensorimotor changes producing motor unit activation patterns associated with the development of further pain. This more comprehensive theory points towards customized treatment strategies, in line with the management approaches to pain proposed in the biopsychosocial model of pain.

疼痛-感觉-运动的相互作用:新视角和新模型
几十年来,疼痛和感觉运动行为如何相互作用一直是研究和辩论的主题。本文回顾了有关疼痛与感觉运动相互作用的理论,并根据脊柱和颅面感觉运动系统中疼痛与感觉运动相互作用的实验和临床研究结果,探讨了这些理论的优势和局限性。最新理论的一个优势在于它们纳入了早期理论中缺失的概念和特征,以解释疼痛-感觉-运动相互作用中感觉-辨别、动机-情感和认知-评价维度的作用。自这些最新理论提出以来所获得的研究结果表明,还需要考虑更多的特征,以提供更全面的疼痛-感觉-运动互动概念。这些特征包括生物-心理-社会影响,从遗传学和表观遗传学等生物因素到心理因素以及包括环境和文化影响在内的社会因素。此外,还需要考虑一个机理框架,其中包括反映痛觉过程的其他生物因素,以及急性或慢性疼痛情况下感觉运动及相关大脑和脊髓回路中的神经胶质细胞和神经可塑性变化。通过查阅文献,我们发现以往关于疼痛-感觉运动相互作用的理论存在局限性,这促使我们提出了一个新概念--疼痛-感觉运动相互作用理论(TOPSMI),我们认为该理论为考虑相互作用及其复杂性提供了一个更全面的框架。该理论认为,疼痛与中枢神经系统(CNS)的可塑性变化有关,这种变化会导致运动单元的激活模式,从而促进个体的适应性感觉运动行为。这种激活模式考虑到了生物、心理和社会对参与感觉运动行为的肌肉骨骼组织的影响,以及对个体的塑性变化和疼痛体验的影响。这种模式通常会根据个体肌肉骨骼组织的特点,在生物力学优势和新陈代谢成本方面进行优化,旨在最大限度地减少疼痛和任何相关的感觉运动变化,从而维持体内平衡。然而,不利的生物-心理-社会因素及其相互作用可能会导致中枢神经系统的可塑性变化,从而导致不太理想的、甚至是不适应的感觉运动变化,产生与进一步疼痛发展相关的运动单元激活模式。这一更为全面的理论指出了定制化的治疗策略,与疼痛的生物心理社会模式中提出的疼痛管理方法相一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurobiology of Pain
Neurobiology of Pain Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
54 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信