The stimulus-driven and representation-driven cross-modal attentional spreading are both modulated by audiovisual temporal synchrony.

Psychophysiology Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-19 DOI:10.1111/psyp.14527
Song Zhao, Fangfang Ma, Jimei Xie, Yuxin Zhou, Chengzhi Feng, Wenfeng Feng
{"title":"The stimulus-driven and representation-driven cross-modal attentional spreading are both modulated by audiovisual temporal synchrony.","authors":"Song Zhao, Fangfang Ma, Jimei Xie, Yuxin Zhou, Chengzhi Feng, Wenfeng Feng","doi":"10.1111/psyp.14527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Multisensory integration and attention can interact in a way that attention to the visual constituent of a multisensory object results in an attentional spreading to its ignored auditory constituent, which can be either stimulus-driven or representation-driven depending on whether the object's visual constituent receives extra representation-based selective attention. Previous research using simple unrelated audiovisual combinations has shown that the stimulus-driven attentional spreading is contingent on audiovisual temporal simultaneity. However, little is known about whether this temporal constraint applies also to the representation-driven attentional spreading, and whether it holds for the stimulus-driven process elicited by real-life multisensory objects. The current event-related potential study investigated these questions by systematically manipulating the visual-to-auditory stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA: 0/100/300 ms) in an object-selective visual recognition task wherein the representation-driven and stimulus-driven spreading processes, measured as two distinct auditory negative difference (Nd) components, could be isolated independently. Our results showed that both the representation-driven and stimulus-driven Nds decreased as the SOA increased. Interestingly, the representation-driven Nd was completely absent, whereas the stimulus-driven Nd was still robust, when the auditory constituents were delayed by 300 ms. These findings not only indicate that the role of audiovisual simultaneity in the representation-driven attentional spreading has been underestimated, but also suggest that learned associations between the unisensory constituents of real-life objects render the stimulus-driven attentional spreading more tolerant of audiovisual asynchrony.</p>","PeriodicalId":94182,"journal":{"name":"Psychophysiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.14527","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Multisensory integration and attention can interact in a way that attention to the visual constituent of a multisensory object results in an attentional spreading to its ignored auditory constituent, which can be either stimulus-driven or representation-driven depending on whether the object's visual constituent receives extra representation-based selective attention. Previous research using simple unrelated audiovisual combinations has shown that the stimulus-driven attentional spreading is contingent on audiovisual temporal simultaneity. However, little is known about whether this temporal constraint applies also to the representation-driven attentional spreading, and whether it holds for the stimulus-driven process elicited by real-life multisensory objects. The current event-related potential study investigated these questions by systematically manipulating the visual-to-auditory stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA: 0/100/300 ms) in an object-selective visual recognition task wherein the representation-driven and stimulus-driven spreading processes, measured as two distinct auditory negative difference (Nd) components, could be isolated independently. Our results showed that both the representation-driven and stimulus-driven Nds decreased as the SOA increased. Interestingly, the representation-driven Nd was completely absent, whereas the stimulus-driven Nd was still robust, when the auditory constituents were delayed by 300 ms. These findings not only indicate that the role of audiovisual simultaneity in the representation-driven attentional spreading has been underestimated, but also suggest that learned associations between the unisensory constituents of real-life objects render the stimulus-driven attentional spreading more tolerant of audiovisual asynchrony.

刺激驱动和表象驱动的跨模态注意扩散都会受到视听时间同步性的调节。
多感官整合与注意力之间的相互作用是,对一个多感官对象的视觉成分的注意会导致对其被忽略的听觉成分的注意扩散,这种扩散可以是刺激驱动的,也可以是表象驱动的,这取决于该对象的视觉成分是否获得了额外的基于表象的选择性注意。以往使用简单的不相关视听组合进行的研究表明,刺激驱动的注意力扩散取决于视听的时间同时性。然而,人们对这种时间限制是否也适用于表象驱动的注意扩散,以及它是否适用于现实生活中多感官对象引起的刺激驱动过程知之甚少。当前的事件相关电位研究通过在一项对象选择性视觉识别任务中系统地操纵视觉与听觉刺激的起始不同步(SOA:0/100/300 ms)来研究这些问题。我们的结果表明,表征驱动和刺激驱动的 Nds 都随着 SOA 的增加而减少。有趣的是,当听觉成分延迟 300 毫秒时,表象驱动的 Nd 完全消失,而刺激驱动的 Nd 仍然强劲。这些发现不仅表明视听同时性在表象驱动的注意扩散中的作用被低估了,而且还表明现实生活中物体的单感官成分之间的习得性关联使得刺激驱动的注意扩散对视听不同步的容忍度更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信