Post Hoc Analysis of Lung Function Improvement and Patient-Reported Outcomes With Revefenacin in Adults With Moderate-to-Very Severe COPD and Comorbid Anxiety or Depression.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Abebaw M Yohannes, Anand S Iyer, Candice Clay, Lauren Cochran, Xianyi Chen, David A Lombardi, Surya P Bhatt
{"title":"Post Hoc Analysis of Lung Function Improvement and Patient-Reported Outcomes With Revefenacin in Adults With Moderate-to-Very Severe COPD and Comorbid Anxiety or Depression.","authors":"Abebaw M Yohannes, Anand S Iyer, Candice Clay, Lauren Cochran, Xianyi Chen, David A Lombardi, Surya P Bhatt","doi":"10.15326/jcopdf.2023.0465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Revefenacin, a once-daily, nebulized, long-acting muscarinic antagonist approved in the United States for the maintenance of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), significantly improves lung function and quality of life versus placebo in patients with moderate-to-very severe COPD. Comorbid anxiety and/or depression may alter patients' symptom perception and response to bronchodilators. The impact of revefenacin in patients with COPD with comorbid anxiety and/or depression has not been previously investigated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This post hoc subgroup analysis examined data from two 12-week, randomized, phase 3 trials in patients with moderate-to-very severe COPD with the following self-reported subgroups: anxiety only (A), depression only (D), anxiety and depression (+A/+D), and neither anxiety nor depression (-A/-D). We assessed change from baseline in trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV<sub>1</sub>) at Day 85 and health status by the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) and COPD Assessment Test (CAT).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 812 patients, 90 (11%), 110 (14%), 141 (17%), and 471 (58%) had A, D, +A/+D, and -A/-D respectively. In revefenacin versus placebo, trough FEV<sub>1</sub> significantly improved from baseline at Day 85 across all subgroups as well as the SGRQ and CAT scores in patients with A, +A/+D, and -A/-D. Revefenacin was well tolerated regardless of A/D status, with a minimal incidence of treatment-emergent antimuscarinic adverse events across subgroups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this analysis, revefenacin versus placebo significantly improved health outcomes in patients with moderate-to-very severe COPD with A, +A/+D, and -A/-D, but not in patients with D. The safety profile of revefenacin was not affected by comorbid anxiety/depression status.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11075345/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15326/jcopdf.2023.0465","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Revefenacin, a once-daily, nebulized, long-acting muscarinic antagonist approved in the United States for the maintenance of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), significantly improves lung function and quality of life versus placebo in patients with moderate-to-very severe COPD. Comorbid anxiety and/or depression may alter patients' symptom perception and response to bronchodilators. The impact of revefenacin in patients with COPD with comorbid anxiety and/or depression has not been previously investigated.

Methods: This post hoc subgroup analysis examined data from two 12-week, randomized, phase 3 trials in patients with moderate-to-very severe COPD with the following self-reported subgroups: anxiety only (A), depression only (D), anxiety and depression (+A/+D), and neither anxiety nor depression (-A/-D). We assessed change from baseline in trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) at Day 85 and health status by the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) and COPD Assessment Test (CAT).

Results: Of 812 patients, 90 (11%), 110 (14%), 141 (17%), and 471 (58%) had A, D, +A/+D, and -A/-D respectively. In revefenacin versus placebo, trough FEV1 significantly improved from baseline at Day 85 across all subgroups as well as the SGRQ and CAT scores in patients with A, +A/+D, and -A/-D. Revefenacin was well tolerated regardless of A/D status, with a minimal incidence of treatment-emergent antimuscarinic adverse events across subgroups.

Conclusion: In this analysis, revefenacin versus placebo significantly improved health outcomes in patients with moderate-to-very severe COPD with A, +A/+D, and -A/-D, but not in patients with D. The safety profile of revefenacin was not affected by comorbid anxiety/depression status.

中度至极重度慢性阻塞性肺病并伴有焦虑或抑郁的成人使用瑞芬那新治疗肺功能改善和患者报告结果的事后分析
背景:雷韦那新是美国批准用于慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)维持治疗的一种每日一次雾化长效毒蕈碱类拮抗剂,与安慰剂相比,它能显著改善中度至极重度慢性阻塞性肺病患者的肺功能和生活质量。合并焦虑和/或抑郁可能会改变患者的症状感知和对支气管扩张剂的反应。此前尚未研究过瑞芬那新对合并焦虑和/或抑郁的慢性阻塞性肺病患者的影响:这项事后亚组分析研究了两项为期 12 周的 3 期随机试验的数据,试验对象为中度至极度严重慢性阻塞性肺病患者,他们自我报告的亚组情况如下:仅焦虑(A)、仅抑郁(D)、焦虑和抑郁(+A/+D)以及既不焦虑也不抑郁(-A/-D)。我们通过圣乔治呼吸问卷(SGRQ)和慢性阻塞性肺病评估测试(CAT)评估了第 85 天时 1 秒钟用力呼气容积(FEV1)谷值与基线相比的变化以及健康状况:在 812 名患者中,分别有 90 人(11%)、110 人(14%)、141 人(17%)和 471 人(58%)患有 A、D、+A/+D 和 -A/-D。瑞芬那新与安慰剂相比,能显著改善所有亚组患者第85天的基线谷值FEV1以及A、+A/+D和-A/-D患者的SGRQ和CAT评分。无论A/D状态如何,瑞芬那新的耐受性都很好,各亚组中治疗引发的抗心绞痛不良事件发生率极低:结论:在这项分析中,瑞芬那新与安慰剂相比,能显著改善A型、+A/+D型和-A/-D型中重度慢性阻塞性肺病患者的健康状况,但对D型患者没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信