Landslide susceptibility mapping using the uncertain and parameter free density-based clustering (UPFDBCAN) algorithm

IF 1.8 3区 地球科学 Q3 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Deborah Simon Mwakapesa, Xiaoji Lan, Yimin Mao, Yaser Ahangari Nanehkaran, Maosheng Zhang
{"title":"Landslide susceptibility mapping using the uncertain and parameter free density-based clustering (UPFDBCAN) algorithm","authors":"Deborah Simon Mwakapesa, Xiaoji Lan, Yimin Mao, Yaser Ahangari Nanehkaran, Maosheng Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s00531-023-02374-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Landslides are one of the most frequent and devastating natural disasters around the world with intensifying impacts on human lives and the environment. To effectively deal with landslides and their consequences, it is primarily important to demarcate areas susceptible to landslides. This can be done through landslide susceptibility mapping (LSM). In this study, a novel approach for landslide susceptibility mapping based on the uncertain and parameter-free density-based clustering (UPFDBSCAN) algorithm was proposed. It merges the ideas from the dominant set clustering algorithm, the DBSCAN algorithm, and the uncertain data modeling method. The study aims to overcome the limitations of depending on user-defined density parameters, the inability to identify clusters of varied densities, and to model the uncertain data, in the DBSCAN algorithm and most of the existing clustering algorithms. This improves the clustering accuracy and efficiency for LSM modeling. For this purpose, the proposed model was experimented with an inventory containing 506 samples of landslide and non-landslide locations, and data of 7 landslide influencing factors from the Baota District in Shaanxi, China. The model’s performance was evaluated and compared with existing clustering-based LSM models as state-of-the-art methods based on standard evaluation metrics. The results revealed that the proposed model obtained the highest performance (sensitivity = 0.935, specificity = 0.944, accuracy = 0.939, AUC = 0.881, JC = 0.898, and purity = 0.899) and it was thus superior to the other models. This study's findings can help decision-makers, policymakers, and land stakeholders to implement significant strategies with early warning systems to predict, prevent, and mitigate the occurrence and impacts of landslides.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Graphical abstract</h3>","PeriodicalId":13845,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Earth Sciences","volume":"93 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Earth Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00531-023-02374-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Landslides are one of the most frequent and devastating natural disasters around the world with intensifying impacts on human lives and the environment. To effectively deal with landslides and their consequences, it is primarily important to demarcate areas susceptible to landslides. This can be done through landslide susceptibility mapping (LSM). In this study, a novel approach for landslide susceptibility mapping based on the uncertain and parameter-free density-based clustering (UPFDBSCAN) algorithm was proposed. It merges the ideas from the dominant set clustering algorithm, the DBSCAN algorithm, and the uncertain data modeling method. The study aims to overcome the limitations of depending on user-defined density parameters, the inability to identify clusters of varied densities, and to model the uncertain data, in the DBSCAN algorithm and most of the existing clustering algorithms. This improves the clustering accuracy and efficiency for LSM modeling. For this purpose, the proposed model was experimented with an inventory containing 506 samples of landslide and non-landslide locations, and data of 7 landslide influencing factors from the Baota District in Shaanxi, China. The model’s performance was evaluated and compared with existing clustering-based LSM models as state-of-the-art methods based on standard evaluation metrics. The results revealed that the proposed model obtained the highest performance (sensitivity = 0.935, specificity = 0.944, accuracy = 0.939, AUC = 0.881, JC = 0.898, and purity = 0.899) and it was thus superior to the other models. This study's findings can help decision-makers, policymakers, and land stakeholders to implement significant strategies with early warning systems to predict, prevent, and mitigate the occurrence and impacts of landslides.

Graphical abstract

Abstract Image

使用基于密度的不确定和无参数聚类算法(UPFDBCAN)绘制滑坡易发性地图
山体滑坡是全世界最频繁、破坏性最大的自然灾害之一,对人类生命和环境的影响日益严重。要有效应对山体滑坡及其后果,最重要的是划定易受山体滑坡影响的区域。这可以通过滑坡易发性绘图(LSM)来实现。本研究提出了一种基于不确定和无参数密度聚类(UPFDBSCAN)算法的新型滑坡易感性绘图方法。它融合了主导集聚类算法、DBSCAN 算法和不确定数据建模方法的思想。该研究旨在克服 DBSCAN 算法和大多数现有聚类算法中依赖用户定义密度参数、无法识别不同密度聚类以及不确定数据建模的局限性。这就提高了 LSM 建模的聚类精度和效率。为此,我们利用中国陕西宝塔区的 506 个滑坡和非滑坡地点样本以及 7 个滑坡影响因素的数据对所提出的模型进行了实验。根据标准评价指标,对模型的性能进行了评估,并与现有的基于聚类的 LSM 模型进行了比较。结果表明,所提出的模型性能最高(灵敏度 = 0.935、特异度 = 0.944、准确度 = 0.939、AUC = 0.881、JC = 0.898、纯度 = 0.899),因此优于其他模型。本研究的发现有助于决策者、政策制定者和土地利益相关者实施具有预警系统的重大战略,以预测、预防和减轻滑坡的发生及其影响。 图文摘要
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Earth Sciences
International Journal of Earth Sciences 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
120
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Earth Sciences publishes process-oriented original and review papers on the history of the earth, including - Dynamics of the lithosphere - Tectonics and volcanology - Sedimentology - Evolution of life - Marine and continental ecosystems - Global dynamics of physicochemical cycles - Mineral deposits and hydrocarbons - Surface processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信