Young children's right to be heard on the quality of their education: Addressing potential misunderstandings in the context of early childhood education

Laura Lundy, Colette Murray, Kylie Smith, Carmel Ward
{"title":"Young children's right to be heard on the quality of their education: Addressing potential misunderstandings in the context of early childhood education","authors":"Laura Lundy, Colette Murray, Kylie Smith, Carmel Ward","doi":"10.1002/berj.3968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In early childhood education many researchers and professionals across the world have embraced the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child's requirement to include young children in decision-making. In the context of ongoing discussion about young children's capacity to share their views and opinions about matters affecting them, there is often a focus on demonstrating ‘evidence’ that young children can participate in decision-making as capable meaning-makers in their own lives, defying traditional paternalistic approaches and assumptions. While acknowledging the important work that has been undertaken to support children's participatory rights, this article seeks to raise questions about whether understanding the right of young children to be heard, particularly in relation to the quality of their education, may have been subject to a form of ‘rights inflation’ that has extended the scope of the application of the right beyond the parameters of the legal framework and/or promoted an interpretation which exceeds what the text of the Convention can bear. In this article, we explore three possible misrepresentations relating to young children's participation in decision-making related to the quality of education: (1) that all children can, should and want to have opportunities to share views on all matters affecting them; (2) that young children should always be allowed to learn and play freely; and (3) that children are <i>the</i> experts in their worlds. We do this to open up a conversation about the limits and partiality of young children's participation when viewed through the lens of children's human rights, highlighting, inter alia, the ongoing need to underscore the role of parents/guardians and professionals in enabling young children to enjoy all of their human rights, including the right to a quality education, fully.","PeriodicalId":501494,"journal":{"name":"British Educational Research Journal ","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Educational Research Journal ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3968","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In early childhood education many researchers and professionals across the world have embraced the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child's requirement to include young children in decision-making. In the context of ongoing discussion about young children's capacity to share their views and opinions about matters affecting them, there is often a focus on demonstrating ‘evidence’ that young children can participate in decision-making as capable meaning-makers in their own lives, defying traditional paternalistic approaches and assumptions. While acknowledging the important work that has been undertaken to support children's participatory rights, this article seeks to raise questions about whether understanding the right of young children to be heard, particularly in relation to the quality of their education, may have been subject to a form of ‘rights inflation’ that has extended the scope of the application of the right beyond the parameters of the legal framework and/or promoted an interpretation which exceeds what the text of the Convention can bear. In this article, we explore three possible misrepresentations relating to young children's participation in decision-making related to the quality of education: (1) that all children can, should and want to have opportunities to share views on all matters affecting them; (2) that young children should always be allowed to learn and play freely; and (3) that children are the experts in their worlds. We do this to open up a conversation about the limits and partiality of young children's participation when viewed through the lens of children's human rights, highlighting, inter alia, the ongoing need to underscore the role of parents/guardians and professionals in enabling young children to enjoy all of their human rights, including the right to a quality education, fully.
幼儿有权就其教育质量发表意见:消除幼儿教育中可能存在的误解
在幼儿教育方面,世界各地的许多研究人员和专业人员都接受了联合国《儿童权利公 约》关于让幼儿参与决策的要求。在不断讨论幼儿是否有能力就影响他们的事项分享自己的观点和意见的背景下,人们往往把重点放在展示 "证据 "上,证明幼儿能够作为自己生活中的有能力的意义创造者参与决策,从而打破传统的家长式方法和假设。本文在肯定为支持儿童的参与权而开展的重要工作的同时,试图提出这样的问题:对幼儿发表意见权的理解,尤其是对其教育质量的理解,是否可能受到了某种形式的 "权利膨胀 "的影响,这种膨胀扩大了权利的适用范围,超出了法律框架的参数,和/或促进了一种超出《公约》文本所能承受范围的解释。在本文中,我们将探讨幼儿参与有关教育质量决策的三种可能的错误表述:(1) 所有儿童都可以、应该并希望有机会就影响他们的所有问题交流意见;(2) 应始终允许幼儿自由学习和游戏;(3) 儿童是他们世界的专家。我们这样做的目的是要开启一场对话,从儿童人权的角度来审视幼儿参与的局限性和偏袒性,特别强调需要不断强调父母/监护人和专业人员在使幼儿能够充分享有包括接受优质教育的权利在内的所有人权方面的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信