From 0-50 in Pandemic, and Then Back? A Case Study of Virtual Care in Ontario Pre–COVID-19, During, and Post–COVID-19

Marisa L. Kfrerer MSc , Kelly Zhang Zheng MSc , Laurel C. Austin PhD
{"title":"From 0-50 in Pandemic, and Then Back? A Case Study of Virtual Care in Ontario Pre–COVID-19, During, and Post–COVID-19","authors":"Marisa L. Kfrerer MSc ,&nbsp;Kelly Zhang Zheng MSc ,&nbsp;Laurel C. Austin PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.mcpdig.2023.07.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We review the evolution of virtual care (VC) in Ontario. Pre–COVID-19, the primary focus was on patients in remote and underserved areas who went to host sites for care. Ontario’s vision pre-pandemic was for a gradual increase in VC by physicians registered with the Ontario Telemedicine Network (OTN), using OTN-approved video technologies; some accommodated patients and doctors wherever they were. Less than 1% of care was virtual pre-pandemic. We discuss how policies that altered access to in-person care (pandemic lockdowns and guidelines to seek and provide care virtually), compensation policy changes (allowing any Ontario physician to be compensated for VC), and policies allowing common technologies not previously allowed (including, importantly, the telephone), drove and enabled a rapid shift to &gt;50% of care being virtual at the start of the pandemic, leveling off to ∼30% over time. We review policy changes in late 2022 and predict these will result in a drop in VC compared with the policies during the pandemic, particularly for walk-in clinic patients, in a province where 2.2-4.6 million people do not have a primary care doctor and presumably use walk-in clinics. This is because, going forward, physicians will be compensated less for telephone care than for in-person or video care for rostered patients, and because compensation will be less still for telephone or video care provided to walk-in patients. Through this case study we develop a visual model of how these key policy and technology factors influence the provision of VC.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74127,"journal":{"name":"Mayo Clinic Proceedings. Digital health","volume":"2 1","pages":"Pages 57-66"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949761223000640/pdfft?md5=7020db9c8c949d3fcbbfdc8245eee591&pid=1-s2.0-S2949761223000640-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mayo Clinic Proceedings. Digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949761223000640","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We review the evolution of virtual care (VC) in Ontario. Pre–COVID-19, the primary focus was on patients in remote and underserved areas who went to host sites for care. Ontario’s vision pre-pandemic was for a gradual increase in VC by physicians registered with the Ontario Telemedicine Network (OTN), using OTN-approved video technologies; some accommodated patients and doctors wherever they were. Less than 1% of care was virtual pre-pandemic. We discuss how policies that altered access to in-person care (pandemic lockdowns and guidelines to seek and provide care virtually), compensation policy changes (allowing any Ontario physician to be compensated for VC), and policies allowing common technologies not previously allowed (including, importantly, the telephone), drove and enabled a rapid shift to >50% of care being virtual at the start of the pandemic, leveling off to ∼30% over time. We review policy changes in late 2022 and predict these will result in a drop in VC compared with the policies during the pandemic, particularly for walk-in clinic patients, in a province where 2.2-4.6 million people do not have a primary care doctor and presumably use walk-in clinics. This is because, going forward, physicians will be compensated less for telephone care than for in-person or video care for rostered patients, and because compensation will be less still for telephone or video care provided to walk-in patients. Through this case study we develop a visual model of how these key policy and technology factors influence the provision of VC.

大流行中从 0 到 50,然后又回来了?安大略省虚拟医疗案例研究:COVID-19 之前、期间和之后
我们回顾了安大略省虚拟医疗(VC)的发展历程。在 COVID-19 之前,主要关注的是偏远地区和服务欠缺地区的患者,他们前往托管地点接受治疗。安大略省在大流行前的愿景是,逐步增加在安大略省远程医疗网络(OTN)注册的医生使用 OTN 批准的视频技术提供的虚拟医疗服务;其中一些技术可随时随地为患者和医生提供服务。在大流行之前,只有不到 1%的医疗服务是虚拟的。我们讨论了改变亲临现场医疗服务的政策(大流行病封锁以及以虚拟方式寻求和提供医疗服务的指导方针)、补偿政策变化(允许安大略省任何医生因虚拟医疗获得补偿)以及允许使用以前不允许使用的常用技术(包括重要的电话)的政策,是如何推动并促成大流行病初期 50%的医疗服务为虚拟医疗服务的快速转变,并随着时间的推移逐渐降低至 30%。我们回顾了 2022 年末的政策变化,并预测与大流行期间的政策相比,这些变化将导致虚拟医疗的下降,尤其是对于无预约诊所的患者而言,因为该省有 220 万至 460 万人没有初级保健医生,他们可能会使用无预约诊所。这是因为,今后医生为电话护理提供的补偿将少于为在册病人提供的面诊或视频护理,而且为无预约病人提供的电话或视频护理的补偿也将更少。通过本案例研究,我们建立了一个可视化模型,说明这些关键的政策和技术因素是如何影响自愿医疗服务的提供的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Mayo Clinic Proceedings. Digital health
Mayo Clinic Proceedings. Digital health Medicine and Dentistry (General), Health Informatics, Public Health and Health Policy
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
47 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信