Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in South Africa: Experience from a single centre in the private sector.

Q3 Medicine
N L F van Zijl, J T Janson, M Sussman, A Geldenhuys
{"title":"Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in South Africa: Experience from a single centre in the private sector.","authors":"N L F van Zijl, J T Janson, M Sussman, A Geldenhuys","doi":"10.7196/AJTCCM.2023.v29i4.211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is an advanced, resource-intensive technology used in a limited capacity in South Africa (SA). Minimal data on the use of ECMO in SA are available.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To describe the indications, early outcome and comorbidities of patients placed on ECMO in the highest-volume ECMO centre in SA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a single-centre retrospective review of all adult patients supported with any form of ECMO from August 2016 to December 2018. Operative and clinical records were reviewed. The primary objective of this study was to review the outcome of patients placed on ECMO in the form of survival to hospital discharge. The secondary objectives were to identify population-specific comorbidities and indications for ECMO that could be associated with non-survival and to compare outcome with known risk scores in the form of the Respiratory ECMO Survival Prediction (RESP) and Survival After Venoarterial ECMO (SAVE) scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and seven patients were identified. The primary indication for ECMO was respiratory support in 78 patients and cardiac support in 29 patients. Forty-seven patients were discharged from hospital, with a 44.0% overall survival rate. Gender (p=0.039), age (p=0.019) and hypertension (p=0.022) were associated with death in univariate logistic regression analysis. However, after adjusting for potential confounding in multivariate logistic regression analysis, the association was no longer significant. In the all respiratory support group, patients in risk class IV had better than predicted survival according to the RESP score, while risk classes I, II and III had worse than predicted survival. In the circulatory support group, all risk classes had worse than predicted survival according to the SAVE score.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We report ECMO outcomes in SA for the first time. We identified very high mortality rates for patients transferred on ECMO from other facilities and for patients converted from venovenous ECMO to venoarterial ECMO. Although our outcomes were comparable in some of the risk classes, further external validation of the SAVE and RESP scores will be needed to compare our outcomes with these scores.</p><p><strong>Study synopsis: </strong><b>What the study adds.</b> We report on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) outcomes in South Africa for the first time. We identified a high mortality rate in patients transferred on ECMO from other facilities, and in patients converted from venovenous ECMO to venoarterial ECMO.<b>Implications of the findings.</b> Transferred patients had a high mortality rate. The reason for this should be further investigated and may highlight the need for possible protocols to assist with appropriate timing of patient transfers and possible earlier intervention or transfer.</p>","PeriodicalId":52847,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Thoracic and Critical Care Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10795019/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Thoracic and Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7196/AJTCCM.2023.v29i4.211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is an advanced, resource-intensive technology used in a limited capacity in South Africa (SA). Minimal data on the use of ECMO in SA are available.

Objectives: To describe the indications, early outcome and comorbidities of patients placed on ECMO in the highest-volume ECMO centre in SA.

Methods: We performed a single-centre retrospective review of all adult patients supported with any form of ECMO from August 2016 to December 2018. Operative and clinical records were reviewed. The primary objective of this study was to review the outcome of patients placed on ECMO in the form of survival to hospital discharge. The secondary objectives were to identify population-specific comorbidities and indications for ECMO that could be associated with non-survival and to compare outcome with known risk scores in the form of the Respiratory ECMO Survival Prediction (RESP) and Survival After Venoarterial ECMO (SAVE) scores.

Results: One hundred and seven patients were identified. The primary indication for ECMO was respiratory support in 78 patients and cardiac support in 29 patients. Forty-seven patients were discharged from hospital, with a 44.0% overall survival rate. Gender (p=0.039), age (p=0.019) and hypertension (p=0.022) were associated with death in univariate logistic regression analysis. However, after adjusting for potential confounding in multivariate logistic regression analysis, the association was no longer significant. In the all respiratory support group, patients in risk class IV had better than predicted survival according to the RESP score, while risk classes I, II and III had worse than predicted survival. In the circulatory support group, all risk classes had worse than predicted survival according to the SAVE score.

Conclusion: We report ECMO outcomes in SA for the first time. We identified very high mortality rates for patients transferred on ECMO from other facilities and for patients converted from venovenous ECMO to venoarterial ECMO. Although our outcomes were comparable in some of the risk classes, further external validation of the SAVE and RESP scores will be needed to compare our outcomes with these scores.

Study synopsis: What the study adds. We report on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) outcomes in South Africa for the first time. We identified a high mortality rate in patients transferred on ECMO from other facilities, and in patients converted from venovenous ECMO to venoarterial ECMO.Implications of the findings. Transferred patients had a high mortality rate. The reason for this should be further investigated and may highlight the need for possible protocols to assist with appropriate timing of patient transfers and possible earlier intervention or transfer.

南非的体外膜肺氧合:一家私营中心的经验。
背景:体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)是一种先进的资源密集型技术,在南非的使用能力有限。有关 ECMO 在南非使用情况的数据极少:目的:描述在南非人数最多的 ECMO 中心接受 ECMO 治疗的患者的适应症、早期疗效和合并症:我们对 2016 年 8 月至 2018 年 12 月期间接受任何形式 ECMO 支持的所有成人患者进行了单中心回顾性审查。对手术和临床记录进行了回顾。本研究的首要目标是回顾接受 ECMO 治疗的患者出院后的存活率。次要目标是确定可能与非存活率相关的人群特异性合并症和 ECMO 适应症,并将结果与已知的风险评分(即呼吸 ECMO 存活率预测 (RESP) 和静脉 ECMO 后存活率 (SAVE) 评分)进行比较:结果:共发现 107 名患者。78 名患者 ECMO 的主要适应症是呼吸支持,29 名患者是心脏支持。47 名患者出院,总存活率为 44.0%。在单变量逻辑回归分析中,性别(p=0.039)、年龄(p=0.019)和高血压(p=0.022)与死亡有关。然而,在多变量逻辑回归分析中调整了潜在的混杂因素后,这种关联不再显著。在所有呼吸支持组中,根据 RESP 评分,风险等级 IV 的患者生存率高于预测值,而风险等级 I、II 和 III 的患者生存率低于预测值。在循环支持组中,根据 SAVE 评分,所有风险分级的存活率均低于预测值:我们首次报告了南澳州的 ECMO 结果。我们发现,从其他机构转入 ECMO 的患者以及从静脉 ECMO 转为静脉 ECMO 的患者死亡率非常高。虽然我们的结果在某些风险等级中具有可比性,但还需要对 SAVE 和 RESP 评分进行进一步的外部验证,以便将我们的结果与这些评分进行比较。我们首次报告了南非的体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)结果。我们发现,从其他机构转入 ECMO 的患者以及从静脉 ECMO 转为静脉动脉 ECMO 的患者死亡率很高。转院患者的死亡率较高。转院患者的死亡率较高,其原因有待进一步研究,并强调需要制定可能的协议,以协助选择适当的患者转院时机,并尽早进行干预或转院。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
African Journal of Thoracic and Critical Care Medicine
African Journal of Thoracic and Critical Care Medicine Medicine-Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信