Interventions and Hospital Characteristics Associated With Patient Experience: An Update of the Evidence.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Medical Care Research and Review Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-18 DOI:10.1177/10775587231223292
Megan K Beckett, Denise D Quigley, William G Lehrman, Laura A Giordano, Christopher W Cohea, Elizabeth H Goldstein, Marc N Elliott
{"title":"Interventions and Hospital Characteristics Associated With Patient Experience: An Update of the Evidence.","authors":"Megan K Beckett, Denise D Quigley, William G Lehrman, Laura A Giordano, Christopher W Cohea, Elizabeth H Goldstein, Marc N Elliott","doi":"10.1177/10775587231223292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patient experience is a key hospital quality measure. We review and characterize the literature on interventions, care and management processes, and structural characteristics associated with better inpatient experiences as measured by the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey. Prior reviews identified several promising interventions. We update these previous efforts by including more recent peer-reviewed literature and expanding the review's scope to include observational studies of HCAHPS measures with process measures and structural characteristics. We used PubMed to identify U.S. English-language peer-reviewed articles published in 2017 to 2020 and focused on hospital patient experience. The two HCAHPS domains for which we found the fewest potential quality improvement interventions were Communication with Doctors and Quietness. We identified several modifiable processes that could be rigorously evaluated in the future, including electronic health record patient engagement functionality, care management processes, and nurse-to-patient ratios. We describe implications for future policy, practice, and research.</p>","PeriodicalId":51127,"journal":{"name":"Medical Care Research and Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Care Research and Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10775587231223292","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Patient experience is a key hospital quality measure. We review and characterize the literature on interventions, care and management processes, and structural characteristics associated with better inpatient experiences as measured by the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey. Prior reviews identified several promising interventions. We update these previous efforts by including more recent peer-reviewed literature and expanding the review's scope to include observational studies of HCAHPS measures with process measures and structural characteristics. We used PubMed to identify U.S. English-language peer-reviewed articles published in 2017 to 2020 and focused on hospital patient experience. The two HCAHPS domains for which we found the fewest potential quality improvement interventions were Communication with Doctors and Quietness. We identified several modifiable processes that could be rigorously evaluated in the future, including electronic health record patient engagement functionality, care management processes, and nurse-to-patient ratios. We describe implications for future policy, practice, and research.

与患者体验相关的干预措施和医院特征:最新证据。
患者体验是衡量医院质量的一个关键指标。我们回顾了与改善住院病人体验相关的干预措施、护理和管理流程以及结构特征的文献,并对其进行了描述,这些都可以通过 "医院医疗服务提供者和系统消费者评估"(HCAHPS)调查来衡量。之前的研究发现了几种有前景的干预措施。我们更新了之前的研究,纳入了更多最新的同行评议文献,并扩大了综述范围,将 HCAHPS 测量与流程测量和结构特征的观察性研究纳入其中。我们使用 PubMed 查找了 2017 年至 2020 年发表的、以医院患者体验为主题的美国英语同行评议文章。我们发现潜在质量改进干预措施最少的两个 HCAHPS 领域是 "与医生沟通 "和 "安静"。我们发现了几项可修改的流程,可在未来进行严格评估,包括电子健康记录的患者参与功能、护理管理流程和护士与患者的比例。我们阐述了对未来政策、实践和研究的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Care Research and Review
Medical Care Research and Review 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
4.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Care Research and Review (MCRR) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal containing critical reviews of literature on organizational structure, economics, and the financing of health and medical care systems. MCRR also includes original empirical and theoretical research and trends to enable policy makers to make informed decisions, as well as to identify health care trends. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Average time from submission to first decision: 25 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信