Development and validation of multicentre study on novel Artificial Intelligence-based Cardiovascular Risk Score (AICVD).

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Shiv Kumar Jalepalli, Prashant Gupta, Andre L A J Dekker, Inigo Bermejo, Sujoy Kar
{"title":"Development and validation of multicentre study on novel Artificial Intelligence-based Cardiovascular Risk Score (AICVD).","authors":"Shiv Kumar Jalepalli, Prashant Gupta, Andre L A J Dekker, Inigo Bermejo, Sujoy Kar","doi":"10.1136/fmch-2023-002340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are one of the most prevalent diseases in India amounting for nearly 30% of total deaths. A dearth of research on CVD risk scores in Indian population, limited performance of conventional risk scores and inability to reproduce the initial accuracies in randomised clinical trials has led to this study on large-scale patient data. The objective is to develop an Artificial Intelligence-based Risk Score (AICVD) to predict CVD event (eg, acute myocardial infarction/acute coronary syndrome) in the next 10 years and compare the model with the Framingham Heart Risk Score (FHRS) and QRisk3.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our study included 31 599 participants aged 18-91 years from 2009 to 2018 in six Apollo Hospitals in India. A multistep risk factors selection process using Spearman correlation coefficient and propensity score matching yielded 21 risk factors. A deep learning hazards model was built on risk factors to predict event occurrence (classification) and time to event (hazards model) using multilayered neural network. Further, the model was validated with independent retrospective cohorts of participants from India and the Netherlands and compared with FHRS and QRisk3.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The deep learning hazards model had a good performance (area under the curve (AUC) 0.853). Validation and comparative results showed AUCs between 0.84 and 0.92 with better positive likelihood ratio (AICVD -6.16 to FHRS -2.24 and QRisk3 -1.16) and accuracy (AICVD -80.15% to FHRS 59.71% and QRisk3 51.57%). In the Netherlands cohort, AICVD also outperformed the Framingham Heart Risk Model (AUC -0.737 vs 0.707).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study concludes that the novel AI-based CVD Risk Score has a higher predictive performance for cardiac events than conventional risk scores in Indian population.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>CTRI/2019/07/020471.</p>","PeriodicalId":44590,"journal":{"name":"Family Medicine and Community Health","volume":"12 Suppl 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10806469/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Medicine and Community Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/fmch-2023-002340","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are one of the most prevalent diseases in India amounting for nearly 30% of total deaths. A dearth of research on CVD risk scores in Indian population, limited performance of conventional risk scores and inability to reproduce the initial accuracies in randomised clinical trials has led to this study on large-scale patient data. The objective is to develop an Artificial Intelligence-based Risk Score (AICVD) to predict CVD event (eg, acute myocardial infarction/acute coronary syndrome) in the next 10 years and compare the model with the Framingham Heart Risk Score (FHRS) and QRisk3.

Methods: Our study included 31 599 participants aged 18-91 years from 2009 to 2018 in six Apollo Hospitals in India. A multistep risk factors selection process using Spearman correlation coefficient and propensity score matching yielded 21 risk factors. A deep learning hazards model was built on risk factors to predict event occurrence (classification) and time to event (hazards model) using multilayered neural network. Further, the model was validated with independent retrospective cohorts of participants from India and the Netherlands and compared with FHRS and QRisk3.

Results: The deep learning hazards model had a good performance (area under the curve (AUC) 0.853). Validation and comparative results showed AUCs between 0.84 and 0.92 with better positive likelihood ratio (AICVD -6.16 to FHRS -2.24 and QRisk3 -1.16) and accuracy (AICVD -80.15% to FHRS 59.71% and QRisk3 51.57%). In the Netherlands cohort, AICVD also outperformed the Framingham Heart Risk Model (AUC -0.737 vs 0.707).

Conclusions: This study concludes that the novel AI-based CVD Risk Score has a higher predictive performance for cardiac events than conventional risk scores in Indian population.

Trial registration number: CTRI/2019/07/020471.

基于人工智能的新型心血管风险评分(AICVD)多中心研究的开发与验证。
目的:心血管疾病(CVD)是印度最常见的疾病之一,占总死亡人数的近 30%。由于对印度人群心血管疾病风险评分的研究不足,传统风险评分的性能有限,以及无法在随机临床试验中再现最初的准确性,导致了这项针对大规模患者数据的研究。该研究的目的是开发一种基于人工智能的风险评分(AICVD),用于预测未来 10 年的心血管疾病事件(如急性心肌梗死/急性冠状动脉综合征),并将该模型与弗雷明汉心脏风险评分(FHRS)和 QRisk3 进行比较:我们的研究纳入了 2009 年至 2018 年印度六家阿波罗医院 31 599 名年龄在 18-91 岁之间的参与者。使用斯皮尔曼相关系数和倾向得分匹配进行多步骤风险因素筛选,得出了 21 个风险因素。利用多层神经网络在风险因素的基础上建立了一个深度学习危害模型,以预测事件发生(分类)和事件发生时间(危害模型)。此外,该模型还通过印度和荷兰的独立回顾性队列参与者进行了验证,并与 FHRS 和 QRisk3 进行了比较:结果:深度学习危害模型表现良好(曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.853)。验证和比较结果显示,AUC 在 0.84 和 0.92 之间,具有更好的正似然比(AICVD -6.16,FHRS -2.24,QRisk3 -1.16 )和准确性(AICVD -80.15%,FHRS 59.71%,QRisk3 51.57%)。在荷兰队列中,AICVD的表现也优于弗雷明汉心脏风险模型(AUC -0.737 vs 0.707):本研究得出结论,在印度人群中,基于人工智能的新型心血管疾病风险评分对心脏事件的预测性能高于传统风险评分:CTRI/2019/07/020471.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: Family Medicine and Community Health (FMCH) is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal focusing on the topics of family medicine, general practice and community health. FMCH strives to be a leading international journal that promotes ‘Health Care for All’ through disseminating novel knowledge and best practices in primary care, family medicine, and community health. FMCH publishes original research, review, methodology, commentary, reflection, and case-study from the lens of population health. FMCH’s Asian Focus section features reports of family medicine development in the Asia-pacific region. FMCH aims to be an exemplary forum for the timely communication of medical knowledge and skills with the goal of promoting improved health care through the practice of family and community-based medicine globally. FMCH aims to serve a diverse audience including researchers, educators, policymakers and leaders of family medicine and community health. We also aim to provide content relevant for researchers working on population health, epidemiology, public policy, disease control and management, preventative medicine and disease burden. FMCH does not impose any article processing charges (APC) or submission charges.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信