Psychometric properties of neck disability index - a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Disability and Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-19 DOI:10.1080/09638288.2024.2304644
Mikhail Saltychev, Kristian Pylkäs, Aleksandra Karklins, Juhani Juhola
{"title":"Psychometric properties of neck disability index - a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Mikhail Saltychev, Kristian Pylkäs, Aleksandra Karklins, Juhani Juhola","doi":"10.1080/09638288.2024.2304644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the data on the psychometric properties of the Neck Disability Index (NDI).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Medline, Embase, PsychINFO, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched in April 2023. The random effects meta-analysis was conducted when possible.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 492 identified records, 79 were included. 70 studies were considered to be of low risk of systematic bias. Alpha was >0.81. Pooled test-retest intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.91 (95% CI 0.90-0.93). The NDI correlations with pain rating scales varied from 0.38 to 0.89. 13 studies found the NDI to be unidimensional and 15 - two- or three-dimensional. The minimal detectable change varied from 3% to 27% and minimal clinically important difference from 5% to 33%. Pooled area under the curve was 0.74 (95% CI 0.68-0.80). Most studies have not detected floor or ceiling effect. Sex-related differential item functioning has been present in one study.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The NDI demonstrated good internal consistency and test-retest reliability without floor or ceiling effect. In most situations, the NDI could be considered a unidimensional scale. The NDI well correlated with the common scales of pain and disability. The minimal clinically important difference and minimal detectable change were around 15% (7.5/50 points).</p>","PeriodicalId":50575,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"5415-5431"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2024.2304644","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the data on the psychometric properties of the Neck Disability Index (NDI).

Materials and methods: Medline, Embase, PsychINFO, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched in April 2023. The random effects meta-analysis was conducted when possible.

Results: Of 492 identified records, 79 were included. 70 studies were considered to be of low risk of systematic bias. Alpha was >0.81. Pooled test-retest intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.91 (95% CI 0.90-0.93). The NDI correlations with pain rating scales varied from 0.38 to 0.89. 13 studies found the NDI to be unidimensional and 15 - two- or three-dimensional. The minimal detectable change varied from 3% to 27% and minimal clinically important difference from 5% to 33%. Pooled area under the curve was 0.74 (95% CI 0.68-0.80). Most studies have not detected floor or ceiling effect. Sex-related differential item functioning has been present in one study.

Conclusions: The NDI demonstrated good internal consistency and test-retest reliability without floor or ceiling effect. In most situations, the NDI could be considered a unidimensional scale. The NDI well correlated with the common scales of pain and disability. The minimal clinically important difference and minimal detectable change were around 15% (7.5/50 points).

颈部残疾指数的心理计量特性--系统回顾与荟萃分析。
目的:评估颈部残疾指数(NDI)的心理测量特性数据:检索了 2023 年 4 月的 Medline、Embase、PsychINFO、Web of Science 和 Scopus。在可能的情况下进行了随机效应荟萃分析:结果:在已确定的 492 条记录中,有 79 条被纳入。70项研究被认为系统性偏倚风险较低。α值大于 0.81。综合测试-重复测试类内相关系数为 0.91 (95% CI 0.90-0.93)。NDI 与疼痛评分量表的相关性从 0.38 到 0.89 不等。13 项研究发现 NDI 是单维的,15 项研究发现 NDI 是二维或三维的。最小可检测到的变化从 3% 到 27% 不等,最小临床重要差异从 5% 到 33% 不等。汇总的曲线下面积为 0.74(95% CI 0.68-0.80)。大多数研究未发现最低或最高效应。一项研究中出现了与性别相关的项目功能差异:NDI显示出良好的内部一致性和测试-再测可靠性,没有最低或最高效应。在大多数情况下,NDI 可被视为单维度量表。NDI 与常见的疼痛和残疾量表有很好的相关性。最小临床重要差异和最小可检测到的变化约为 15%(7.5/50 分)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Disability and Rehabilitation
Disability and Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
415
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Disability and Rehabilitation along with Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology are international multidisciplinary journals which seek to encourage a better understanding of all aspects of disability and to promote rehabilitation science, practice and policy aspects of the rehabilitation process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信