Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Classifications for Symptom of Adenomyosis.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-17 DOI:10.1159/000535802
Ying Tang, Zhi-Jun Jiang, Ming-Bo Wen, Bin Su, Jun-Rong Huang, Hang Wang, Jia Wu, Ming-Tao Yang, Na Ding, Hui-Quan Hu, Fan Xu, Jun Li, Qiuling Shi
{"title":"Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Classifications for Symptom of Adenomyosis.","authors":"Ying Tang, Zhi-Jun Jiang, Ming-Bo Wen, Bin Su, Jun-Rong Huang, Hang Wang, Jia Wu, Ming-Tao Yang, Na Ding, Hui-Quan Hu, Fan Xu, Jun Li, Qiuling Shi","doi":"10.1159/000535802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of the study was to identify an optimal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based classification for the severity of adenomyosis and explore the factors associated with disease severity (dysmenorrhea or menorrhagia).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>and Participants: Several classifications based on MRI have been proposed, and their phenotypes are reported to be associated with the severity of adenomyosis. However, a consensus classification based on MRI findings has not yet been reached. Our study was designed to retrospectively analyze data from a cohort of patients in the Affiliated Nanchong Central Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College from June 2017 to December 2021 before focused ultrasound ablation surgery (FUAS), identify the optimal classification of adenomyosis severity from different classification criteria, and explore factors associated with the presence of symptoms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The proportions of disease severity among different classification groups were compared to obtain the one generating the most considerable χ2 value, which was identified as the optimal classification for informing disease severity. A logistic regression model was constructed to explore factors associated with disease severity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Classification of Kobayashi H (classification 4) concerning the affected areas and size (volumes of lesions) was recognized as the optimal one, which identified dysmenorrhea (χ2 = 18.550, p value = 0.002) and menorrhagia (χ2 = 15.060, p value = 0.010) secondary to adenomyosis. For volumes of the uterine wall &lt;2/3, the dysmenorrhea rate in subtype 4 was higher than that in subtype 1 (χ2 = 4.114, p value = 0.043), and the dysmenorrhea rate in subtype 5 was higher than that in subtype 2 (χ2 = 4.357, p value = 0.037). Age (odds ratio [OR] = 0.899, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.810∼0.997, p value = 0.044) and external phenotype (OR = 3.588, 95% CI = 1.018∼12.643, p value = 0.047) were associated with dysmenorrhea. Concerning volumes of the uterine wall ≥2/3, the menorrhagia rate in subtype 3 remarkably increased compared with that in subtype 6 (χ2 = 9.776, p value = 0.002), and internal phenotype was identified as an independent factor associated with menorrhagia (OR = 1.706, 95% CI = 1.131∼2.573, p value = 0.011).</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Patients in our study were all included before FUAS, which limited our result interpretation for the general patient population.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MRI-based classification 4 is identified as an optimal classification for informing the severity of adenomyosis. The phenotype of classification is the main characteristic associated with disease severity.</p>","PeriodicalId":12952,"journal":{"name":"Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation","volume":" ","pages":"402-412"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000535802","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of the study was to identify an optimal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based classification for the severity of adenomyosis and explore the factors associated with disease severity (dysmenorrhea or menorrhagia).

Design: and Participants: Several classifications based on MRI have been proposed, and their phenotypes are reported to be associated with the severity of adenomyosis. However, a consensus classification based on MRI findings has not yet been reached. Our study was designed to retrospectively analyze data from a cohort of patients in the Affiliated Nanchong Central Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College from June 2017 to December 2021 before focused ultrasound ablation surgery (FUAS), identify the optimal classification of adenomyosis severity from different classification criteria, and explore factors associated with the presence of symptoms.

Methods: The proportions of disease severity among different classification groups were compared to obtain the one generating the most considerable χ2 value, which was identified as the optimal classification for informing disease severity. A logistic regression model was constructed to explore factors associated with disease severity.

Results: Classification of Kobayashi H (classification 4) concerning the affected areas and size (volumes of lesions) was recognized as the optimal one, which identified dysmenorrhea (χ2 = 18.550, p value = 0.002) and menorrhagia (χ2 = 15.060, p value = 0.010) secondary to adenomyosis. For volumes of the uterine wall <2/3, the dysmenorrhea rate in subtype 4 was higher than that in subtype 1 (χ2 = 4.114, p value = 0.043), and the dysmenorrhea rate in subtype 5 was higher than that in subtype 2 (χ2 = 4.357, p value = 0.037). Age (odds ratio [OR] = 0.899, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.810∼0.997, p value = 0.044) and external phenotype (OR = 3.588, 95% CI = 1.018∼12.643, p value = 0.047) were associated with dysmenorrhea. Concerning volumes of the uterine wall ≥2/3, the menorrhagia rate in subtype 3 remarkably increased compared with that in subtype 6 (χ2 = 9.776, p value = 0.002), and internal phenotype was identified as an independent factor associated with menorrhagia (OR = 1.706, 95% CI = 1.131∼2.573, p value = 0.011).

Limitations: Patients in our study were all included before FUAS, which limited our result interpretation for the general patient population.

Conclusions: MRI-based classification 4 is identified as an optimal classification for informing the severity of adenomyosis. The phenotype of classification is the main characteristic associated with disease severity.

基于磁共振成像的子宫腺肌症症状分类。
目的确定基于磁共振成像(MRI)的子宫腺肌症严重程度的最佳分类,并探讨与疾病严重程度(痛经或月经过多)相关的因素:已提出了几种基于核磁共振成像的分类方法,据报道其表型与子宫腺肌症的严重程度有关。然而,基于磁共振成像结果的分类尚未达成共识。我们的研究旨在回顾性分析川北医学院附属南充市中心医院2017年6月至2021年12月聚焦超声消融手术(FUAS)前的患者队列数据,从不同的分类标准中确定子宫腺肌症严重程度的最佳分类,并探讨与出现症状相关的因素:方法:比较不同分类组中疾病严重程度的比例,得出最可观的卡方值,并将其确定为告知疾病严重程度的最佳分类。建立了一个逻辑回归模型,以探索与疾病严重程度相关的因素:结果:小林 H(分类 4)关于受影响部位和大小(病变体积)的分类被认为是最佳分类,可确定继发于子宫腺肌症的痛经(χ2=18.550,P 值=0.002)和月经过多(χ2=15.060,P 值=0.010)。子宫壁体积限制:我们研究中的患者都是在FUAS之前纳入的,这限制了我们对普通患者人群的结果解释:结论:基于核磁共振成像的第 4 级分类被认为是告知子宫腺肌症严重程度的最佳分类。结论:基于磁共振成像的第 4 级分类被认为是告知子宫腺肌症严重程度的最佳分类,而分类的表型是与疾病严重程度相关的主要特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
44
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal covers the most active and promising areas of current research in gynecology and obstetrics. Invited, well-referenced reviews by noted experts keep readers in touch with the general framework and direction of international study. Original papers report selected experimental and clinical investigations in all fields related to gynecology, obstetrics and reproduction. Short communications are published to allow immediate discussion of new data. The international and interdisciplinary character of this periodical provides an avenue to less accessible sources and to worldwide research for investigators and practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信