Informing Utstein-style reporting guidelines for prehospital thrombolysis: A scoping review

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Louis Jenkins , Tania Johnston , Richard Armour , Sonja Maria
{"title":"Informing Utstein-style reporting guidelines for prehospital thrombolysis: A scoping review","authors":"Louis Jenkins ,&nbsp;Tania Johnston ,&nbsp;Richard Armour ,&nbsp;Sonja Maria","doi":"10.1016/j.auec.2023.12.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Rural Australians with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) face higher mortality rates due to limited access to specialised cardiac services. Paramedic-administered prehospital thrombolysis (PHT) has emerged as an alternative to primary percutaneous intervention (pPCI) for patients facing barriers or delays to cardiac care. There is variability in PHT practices among Australian ambulance services, lacking standardised definitions and outcome measures. The aim of this scoping review was to identify quality indicators and influencing factors associated with outcomes for patients receiving PHT.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A systematic search of literature in SCOPUS and Academic Search Complete, CINAHL and Health Source: Nursing/Academic Edition databases via EBSCO (Health) was conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology. Peer-reviewed studies from the past decade were screened using search criteria relevant to prehospital thrombolysis and quality indicators. Data extraction was performed and themed using five domains from the Utstein-style template commonly known for standardised prehospital cardiac arrest reporting.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>After removing duplicates, the search yielded 3596 articles with 28 empirical studies meeting inclusion criteria for the review. These were primarily retrospective cohort studies performed in Australia, Canada and the United States. The scoping review identified 24 clinical quality indicators and factors related to Emergency Medical Service (EMS) systems, AMI recognition and ambulance dispatch, patient variables, PHT processes and patient outcomes. These findings correlate to the Donabedian structure-process-outcome quality of care model and have utility to inform future PHT reporting guidelines for jurisdictional ambulance services.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Given the variability in prehospital practice across Australian ambulance services, standardised reporting on quality indicators for PHT is needed. The Utstein-style template used to report data on pre-hospital cardiac arrest, trauma and airway management could be used for quality improvement in PHT. This review presents 24 quality indicators representing system, recognition and response, patient, process, and outcomes related to PHT. These results could be used to inform a future Delphi study and Utstein-like reporting guideline for prehospital thrombolysis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55979,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Emergency Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2588994X23000908/pdfft?md5=0fbf3c20128a488efae8450a1ff424c2&pid=1-s2.0-S2588994X23000908-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2588994X23000908","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Rural Australians with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) face higher mortality rates due to limited access to specialised cardiac services. Paramedic-administered prehospital thrombolysis (PHT) has emerged as an alternative to primary percutaneous intervention (pPCI) for patients facing barriers or delays to cardiac care. There is variability in PHT practices among Australian ambulance services, lacking standardised definitions and outcome measures. The aim of this scoping review was to identify quality indicators and influencing factors associated with outcomes for patients receiving PHT.

Methods

A systematic search of literature in SCOPUS and Academic Search Complete, CINAHL and Health Source: Nursing/Academic Edition databases via EBSCO (Health) was conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology. Peer-reviewed studies from the past decade were screened using search criteria relevant to prehospital thrombolysis and quality indicators. Data extraction was performed and themed using five domains from the Utstein-style template commonly known for standardised prehospital cardiac arrest reporting.

Results

After removing duplicates, the search yielded 3596 articles with 28 empirical studies meeting inclusion criteria for the review. These were primarily retrospective cohort studies performed in Australia, Canada and the United States. The scoping review identified 24 clinical quality indicators and factors related to Emergency Medical Service (EMS) systems, AMI recognition and ambulance dispatch, patient variables, PHT processes and patient outcomes. These findings correlate to the Donabedian structure-process-outcome quality of care model and have utility to inform future PHT reporting guidelines for jurisdictional ambulance services.

Conclusions

Given the variability in prehospital practice across Australian ambulance services, standardised reporting on quality indicators for PHT is needed. The Utstein-style template used to report data on pre-hospital cardiac arrest, trauma and airway management could be used for quality improvement in PHT. This review presents 24 quality indicators representing system, recognition and response, patient, process, and outcomes related to PHT. These results could be used to inform a future Delphi study and Utstein-like reporting guideline for prehospital thrombolysis.

院前溶栓的乌特斯坦式报告指南:范围审查
背景澳大利亚农村地区的急性心肌梗塞(AMI)患者由于难以获得专业的心脏医疗服务而面临较高的死亡率。辅助医务人员进行的院前溶栓治疗(PHT)已成为面临心脏护理障碍或延误的患者经皮介入治疗(pPCI)的替代方案。澳大利亚救护服务机构的 PHT 实践存在差异,缺乏标准化的定义和结果衡量标准。方法在 SCOPUS 和 Academic Search Complete、CINAHL 和 Health Source 中对文献进行系统检索:按照乔安娜-布里格斯研究所(Joanna Briggs Institute)的方法,通过 EBSCO(健康)对护理/学术版数据库进行了系统检索。使用与院前溶栓和质量指标相关的检索标准筛选了过去十年中经过同行评审的研究。在去除重复内容后,共检索到 3596 篇文章,其中有 28 项经验性研究符合综述的纳入标准。这些研究主要是在澳大利亚、加拿大和美国进行的回顾性队列研究。范围界定审查确定了 24 项临床质量指标以及与急救医疗服务 (EMS) 系统、急性心肌梗死识别和救护车调度、患者变量、PHT 流程和患者预后相关的因素。这些研究结果与多纳比德结构-过程-结果护理质量模型相关联,有助于为辖区内救护车服务机构未来的 PHT 报告指南提供信息。结论鉴于澳大利亚各救护车服务机构的院前实践存在差异,因此需要对 PHT 质量指标进行标准化报告。用于报告院前心脏骤停、创伤和气道管理数据的乌特斯坦式模板可用于改善院前急救质量。本综述介绍了 24 项质量指标,分别代表与 PHT 相关的系统、识别和响应、患者、流程和结果。这些结果可用于未来的德尔菲研究和类似于 Utstein 的院前溶栓报告指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australasian Emergency Care
Australasian Emergency Care Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
82
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Australasian Emergency Care is an international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to supporting emergency nurses, physicians, paramedics and other professionals in advancing the science and practice of emergency care, wherever it is delivered. As the official journal of the College of Emergency Nursing Australasia (CENA), Australasian Emergency Care is a conduit for clinical, applied, and theoretical research and knowledge that advances the science and practice of emergency care in original, innovative and challenging ways. The journal serves as a leading voice for the emergency care community, reflecting its inter-professional diversity, and the importance of collaboration and shared decision-making to achieve quality patient outcomes. It is strongly focussed on advancing the patient experience and quality of care across the emergency care continuum, spanning the pre-hospital, hospital and post-hospital settings within Australasia and beyond.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信