Optimal configurations of Minimally Intelligent additive manufacturing machines for Makerspace production environments

AI EDAM Pub Date : 2024-01-17 DOI:10.1017/s0890060423000239
James Gopsill, Mark Goudswaard, Chris Snider, Lorenzo Giunta, Ben Hicks
{"title":"Optimal configurations of Minimally Intelligent additive manufacturing machines for Makerspace production environments","authors":"James Gopsill, Mark Goudswaard, Chris Snider, Lorenzo Giunta, Ben Hicks","doi":"10.1017/s0890060423000239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Additive manufacturing (AM) has transformed job shop production and catalysed the growth of Makerspaces, FabLabs, Hackspaces, and Repair Cafés. AM has enabled the handling and manufacturing of a wide variety of components, and its accessibility has enabled more individuals to make. While smaller than their production-scale counterparts, the objectives of minimizing technician overhead, capital expenditure, and job response time remain the same. The typical First-Come First-Serve (FCFS) operating model, while functional, is not necessarily the most efficient and makes responding to a-typical or urgent demand profiles difficult. This article reports a study that investigated how AM machines configured with Minimally Intelligent agents can support production in these environments. An agent-based model that simulated 5, 10, 15, and 20 AM machines operating a 9 am−5 pm pattern and experiencing a diverse non-repeating demand profile was developed. Machines were configured with minimal intelligence – FCFS, First-Response First-Serve (FRFS), Longest Print Time (LPT), Shortest Print Time (SPT), and Random Selection logics – that governed the selection of jobs from the job pool. A full factorial simulation totaling 15,629 configurations was run until convergence to a ranked list of production performance – min Job Time-in-System. Performance changed as much as 200%. Performant configurations featured a variety of logics, while the least performant were dominated by FCFS and LPT. All FCFS (a proxy for today’s operations) was one of the least performant configurations. The results provide an optimal set of logics and performance bands that can be used to justify capital expenditure and AM operations in Makerspaces.</p>","PeriodicalId":501676,"journal":{"name":"AI EDAM","volume":"56 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AI EDAM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0890060423000239","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Additive manufacturing (AM) has transformed job shop production and catalysed the growth of Makerspaces, FabLabs, Hackspaces, and Repair Cafés. AM has enabled the handling and manufacturing of a wide variety of components, and its accessibility has enabled more individuals to make. While smaller than their production-scale counterparts, the objectives of minimizing technician overhead, capital expenditure, and job response time remain the same. The typical First-Come First-Serve (FCFS) operating model, while functional, is not necessarily the most efficient and makes responding to a-typical or urgent demand profiles difficult. This article reports a study that investigated how AM machines configured with Minimally Intelligent agents can support production in these environments. An agent-based model that simulated 5, 10, 15, and 20 AM machines operating a 9 am−5 pm pattern and experiencing a diverse non-repeating demand profile was developed. Machines were configured with minimal intelligence – FCFS, First-Response First-Serve (FRFS), Longest Print Time (LPT), Shortest Print Time (SPT), and Random Selection logics – that governed the selection of jobs from the job pool. A full factorial simulation totaling 15,629 configurations was run until convergence to a ranked list of production performance – min Job Time-in-System. Performance changed as much as 200%. Performant configurations featured a variety of logics, while the least performant were dominated by FCFS and LPT. All FCFS (a proxy for today’s operations) was one of the least performant configurations. The results provide an optimal set of logics and performance bands that can be used to justify capital expenditure and AM operations in Makerspaces.

创客空间生产环境中最小智能增材制造设备的优化配置
快速成型制造(AM)改变了工作车间的生产方式,促进了创客空间、FabLabs、Hackspaces 和维修咖啡馆的发展。增材制造能够处理和制造各种各样的部件,其便利性使更多的人能够进行制造。虽然与生产规模的同类产品相比,AM 的规模较小,但最大限度地减少技术人员开销、资本支出和工作响应时间的目标仍然相同。典型的 "先到先服务"(FCFS)运营模式虽然实用,但并不一定是最有效的,而且很难对非典型或紧急需求做出响应。本文报告了一项研究,该研究调查了配置了微智能代理的自动成型机如何支持这些环境下的生产。该研究开发了一个基于代理的模型,模拟了 5、10、15 和 20 台上午 9 点至下午 5 点模式下运行的 AM 机,以及各种非重复性的需求情况。机器配置了最基本的智能 - FCFS、先响应先服务 (FRFS)、最长打印时间 (LPT)、最短打印时间 (SPT) 和随机选择逻辑,用于控制从作业库中选择作业。运行了总计 15629 个配置的全因子模拟,直到收敛到一个生产性能排名列表--系统内最小作业时间。性能变化高达 200%。性能高的配置采用了多种逻辑,而性能最低的配置则以 FCFS 和 LPT 为主。全 FCFS(代表当今的操作)是性能最低的配置之一。这些结果提供了一组最佳逻辑和性能带,可用于证明创客空间的资本支出和 AM 操作的合理性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信