Implementing a Respectful Maternity Care Guideline During Childbirth Experiences

Catherine M. Hill, Heidi Collins Fantasia, Shawana Burnette
{"title":"Implementing a Respectful Maternity Care Guideline During Childbirth Experiences","authors":"Catherine M. Hill,&nbsp;Heidi Collins Fantasia,&nbsp;Shawana Burnette","doi":"10.1016/j.nwh.2023.09.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To measure the impact of an evidence-based guideline on respectful maternity care on nurses’ attitudes and beliefs about childbirth practices.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p><span>A quality improvement pilot project with a pretest/posttest design examining the attitudes and beliefs of </span>intrapartum nurses about childbirth practices of respectful care.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>High-risk intrapartum unit at a tertiary care center in the southeastern United States.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>A convenience sample of 130 registered nurses were invited to participate, and nine completed the pre- and posttests.</p></div><div><h3>Intervention/Measurements</h3><p>The intervention included a recorded webinar, access to printed and electronic copies of the guideline, discussions in daily huddles, and a virtual journal club. Data were collected using the 42-item Nurse Attitudes and Beliefs Questionnaire–Revised. Lower scores are reflective of attitudes and beliefs that support a medical model of care, whereas higher scores are reflective of a physiologic model of care. Descriptive statistics and the Wilcoxon signed rank test were used to analyze changes in attitudes and beliefs based on the aggregate scores of the nurse participants.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Although there was no change in nurse attitude and beliefs about childbirth practices after 3 months (<em>p =</em> .058), the aggregate scores on a scale of 42 to 168 increased by 5.6 points. Two subscales of the Nurse Attitudes and Beliefs Questionnaire–Revised—Medical Model of Conflict and Women’s Autonomy—had the greatest increase in aggregate scores.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Understanding nurses’ attitudes and beliefs can assist in identifying barriers to the provision of respectful care, particularly during labor and birth, when patients are most vulnerable. Measurement of nurse attitudes and beliefs regarding respectful maternity care may require a longer immersion in a respectful maternity care program to allow for changes over time.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":39985,"journal":{"name":"Nursing for Women''s Health","volume":"28 1","pages":"Pages 50-57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing for Women''s Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751485123002520","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To measure the impact of an evidence-based guideline on respectful maternity care on nurses’ attitudes and beliefs about childbirth practices.

Design

A quality improvement pilot project with a pretest/posttest design examining the attitudes and beliefs of intrapartum nurses about childbirth practices of respectful care.

Setting

High-risk intrapartum unit at a tertiary care center in the southeastern United States.

Participants

A convenience sample of 130 registered nurses were invited to participate, and nine completed the pre- and posttests.

Intervention/Measurements

The intervention included a recorded webinar, access to printed and electronic copies of the guideline, discussions in daily huddles, and a virtual journal club. Data were collected using the 42-item Nurse Attitudes and Beliefs Questionnaire–Revised. Lower scores are reflective of attitudes and beliefs that support a medical model of care, whereas higher scores are reflective of a physiologic model of care. Descriptive statistics and the Wilcoxon signed rank test were used to analyze changes in attitudes and beliefs based on the aggregate scores of the nurse participants.

Results

Although there was no change in nurse attitude and beliefs about childbirth practices after 3 months (p = .058), the aggregate scores on a scale of 42 to 168 increased by 5.6 points. Two subscales of the Nurse Attitudes and Beliefs Questionnaire–Revised—Medical Model of Conflict and Women’s Autonomy—had the greatest increase in aggregate scores.

Conclusion

Understanding nurses’ attitudes and beliefs can assist in identifying barriers to the provision of respectful care, particularly during labor and birth, when patients are most vulnerable. Measurement of nurse attitudes and beliefs regarding respectful maternity care may require a longer immersion in a respectful maternity care program to allow for changes over time.

在分娩过程中实施 "尊重产妇护理指南"。
目的衡量尊重产妇护理循证指南对护士分娩实践的态度和信念的影响:设计:一项质量改进试点项目,采用前测/后测设计,考察产科护士对尊重产妇护理分娩实践的态度和信念:地点:美国东南部一家三级医疗中心的高风险产前病房:干预/测量:干预措施包括录制网络研讨会、获取指南的印刷版和电子版、在每日例会上进行讨论以及虚拟期刊俱乐部。使用 42 项护士态度和信念问卷(修订版)收集数据。较低的分数反映了支持医疗护理模式的态度和信念,而较高的分数则反映了支持生理护理模式的态度和信念。根据护士参与者的总分,使用描述性统计和威尔科克森符号秩检验分析态度和信念的变化:结果:尽管 3 个月后护士对分娩实践的态度和信念没有发生变化(p = .058),但在 42 分到 168 分的量表中,总分增加了 5.6 分。护士态度和信念问卷(修订版)的两个分量表--冲突的医学模式和妇女的自主性--的总分增加最多:结论:了解护士的态度和信念有助于找出提供尊重护理的障碍,尤其是在患者最脆弱的分娩和生产期间。要衡量护士对尊重产妇护理的态度和信念,可能需要在尊重产妇护理项目中进行更长时间的浸泡,以便随着时间的推移而发生变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nursing for Women''s Health
Nursing for Women''s Health Nursing-Nursing (all)
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
期刊介绍: Nursing for Women"s Health publishes the most recent and compelling health care information on women"s health, newborn care and professional nursing issues. As a refereed, clinical practice journal, it provides professionals involved in providing optimum nursing care for women and their newborns with health care trends and everyday issues in a concise, practical, and easy-to-read format.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信