Standard of care plus telmisartan on respiratory failure due to COVID-19 (STAR-COVID trial).

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-17 DOI:10.23736/S2724-5683.23.06463-3
Abraham E Gracia-Ramos, Gissel Y Ángeles-Durán, Iván R Flores-Gómez, Emmanuel Flores-Martínez, Tania I Valdin-Orozco, Jesús R Reyes-Peralta, César Pedraza-Hervert, Flor A Garcia-Arroyo, Antonio Cortés Ortíz, María J Pecero-Hidalgo
{"title":"Standard of care plus telmisartan on respiratory failure due to COVID-19 (STAR-COVID trial).","authors":"Abraham E Gracia-Ramos, Gissel Y Ángeles-Durán, Iván R Flores-Gómez, Emmanuel Flores-Martínez, Tania I Valdin-Orozco, Jesús R Reyes-Peralta, César Pedraza-Hervert, Flor A Garcia-Arroyo, Antonio Cortés Ortíz, María J Pecero-Hidalgo","doi":"10.23736/S2724-5683.23.06463-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The potential influence of renin-angiotensin inhibitors on the severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection has been considered in preclinical and observational studies with contradictory results. Therefore, we investigated the effect of telmisartan in reducing lung injury among hospitalized COVID-19 patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The STAR-COVID trial was conducted as a prospective, parallel-group, randomized, open-label study involving hospitalized adult patients with severe COVID-19 (NCT04510662). Sixty-six patients were enrolled: 33 were assigned to the telmisartan group and 33 to the control group. The mean age of participants was 48.8 years, with 62.5% being male. Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either telmisartan (40 mg daily for 14 days or until discharge) plus standard of care or standard of care alone. The primary outcome assessed was the initiation of mechanical ventilation within 14 days. Secondary outcomes included 30-day mortality, the need for vasopressors, hemodialysis requirements, and length of hospital stay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Comparison between the telmisartan group and the control group revealed no significant difference in the occurrence of mechanical ventilation at 14 days (25% with telmisartan vs. 18.7% with control, P=0.579). Additionally, there were no significant differences observed in terms of mortality (25% vs. 21.9%, P=0.768), the need for vasopressors (18.8% in both groups, P=1.000), hemodialysis requirements (6.3% vs. 3.1%, P=0.500), and length of hospital stay (median of 7 days in both groups, P=0.962).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared with the standard of care, telmisartan therapy demonstrated no significant impact on respiratory failure in hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-5683.23.06463-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The potential influence of renin-angiotensin inhibitors on the severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection has been considered in preclinical and observational studies with contradictory results. Therefore, we investigated the effect of telmisartan in reducing lung injury among hospitalized COVID-19 patients.

Methods: The STAR-COVID trial was conducted as a prospective, parallel-group, randomized, open-label study involving hospitalized adult patients with severe COVID-19 (NCT04510662). Sixty-six patients were enrolled: 33 were assigned to the telmisartan group and 33 to the control group. The mean age of participants was 48.8 years, with 62.5% being male. Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either telmisartan (40 mg daily for 14 days or until discharge) plus standard of care or standard of care alone. The primary outcome assessed was the initiation of mechanical ventilation within 14 days. Secondary outcomes included 30-day mortality, the need for vasopressors, hemodialysis requirements, and length of hospital stay.

Results: Comparison between the telmisartan group and the control group revealed no significant difference in the occurrence of mechanical ventilation at 14 days (25% with telmisartan vs. 18.7% with control, P=0.579). Additionally, there were no significant differences observed in terms of mortality (25% vs. 21.9%, P=0.768), the need for vasopressors (18.8% in both groups, P=1.000), hemodialysis requirements (6.3% vs. 3.1%, P=0.500), and length of hospital stay (median of 7 days in both groups, P=0.962).

Conclusions: Compared with the standard of care, telmisartan therapy demonstrated no significant impact on respiratory failure in hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19.

标准护理加替米沙坦治疗 COVID-19 引起的呼吸衰竭(STAR-COVID 试验)。
背景:临床前研究和观察性研究考虑了肾素-血管紧张素抑制剂对SARS-CoV-2感染严重程度的潜在影响,但结果相互矛盾。因此,我们研究了替米沙坦对减轻 COVID-19 住院患者肺损伤的影响:STAR-COVID试验是一项前瞻性、平行组、随机、开放标签研究,涉及重症COVID-19住院成年患者(NCT04510662)。66名患者参与了这项研究:33人被分配到替米沙坦组,33人被分配到对照组。参与者的平均年龄为 48.8 岁,62.5% 为男性。参与者按1:1的比例被随机分配到接受替米沙坦(每天40毫克,持续14天或直到出院)加标准护理或仅接受标准护理。评估的主要结果是 14 天内是否开始机械通气。次要结果包括 30 天死亡率、血管加压剂需求、血液透析需求和住院时间:替米沙坦组与对照组的比较显示,14天内机械通气的发生率无显著差异(替米沙坦组为25%,对照组为18.7%,P=0.579)。此外,在死亡率(25% vs. 21.9%,P=0.768)、血管加压剂需求(两组均为18.8%,P=1.000)、血液透析需求(6.3% vs. 3.1%,P=0.500)和住院时间(两组中位数均为7天,P=0.962)方面也未观察到显著差异:与标准治疗相比,替米沙坦治疗对重症COVID-19住院患者的呼吸衰竭没有明显影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信