Foucault's Epicureanism: Parrhēsia, Confession, and the Genealogy of the Self

IF 0.2 3区 历史学 0 CLASSICS
ARETHUSA Pub Date : 2024-01-16 DOI:10.1353/are.2023.a917341
Federico Testa
{"title":"Foucault's Epicureanism: Parrhēsia, Confession, and the Genealogy of the Self","authors":"Federico Testa","doi":"10.1353/are.2023.a917341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Abstract:</p><p>This paper addresses the apparent absence of a systematic analysis of Epicureanism in Foucault's exploration of ancient philosophy. By considering Pierre Hadot's remark concerning Foucault's problematic neglect of the Epicurean notion of <i>hēdonē</i>, it revisits Foucault's work in search of traces of his engagement with Epicureanism. It then goes on to analyze the genesis of the notion of <i>parrhēsia</i> in Foucault's work, showing how it first appears and is developed in a series of analyses of the \"philosophy of the garden,\" first in a reading of Epicurus's view on the study of nature in the <i>Vatican Sayings</i>, second in his study of Philodemus's <i>Peri Parrhēsias</i>. It is precisely in a series of readings of the Epicurean school that Foucault finds one of his key theoretical resources guiding his study of ancient philosophical practices in the 1980s. More importantly, the paper seeks to articulate the ways in which the analysis of <i>parrhēsia</i>—and of the Epicureans in particular—is situated in a broader genealogy of confession, which connects Foucault's studies of ancient philosophy to his readings of Christianity and the formation of the modern technologies of power and veridiction, defining aspects of the earlier project of a <i>History of Sexuality</i>, as announced in the <i>Will to Knowledge</i>. Finally, the paper articulates a possible view on the critical import of <i>parrhēsia</i> in this broader genealogy of confession.</p></p>","PeriodicalId":44750,"journal":{"name":"ARETHUSA","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARETHUSA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/are.2023.a917341","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:

This paper addresses the apparent absence of a systematic analysis of Epicureanism in Foucault's exploration of ancient philosophy. By considering Pierre Hadot's remark concerning Foucault's problematic neglect of the Epicurean notion of hēdonē, it revisits Foucault's work in search of traces of his engagement with Epicureanism. It then goes on to analyze the genesis of the notion of parrhēsia in Foucault's work, showing how it first appears and is developed in a series of analyses of the "philosophy of the garden," first in a reading of Epicurus's view on the study of nature in the Vatican Sayings, second in his study of Philodemus's Peri Parrhēsias. It is precisely in a series of readings of the Epicurean school that Foucault finds one of his key theoretical resources guiding his study of ancient philosophical practices in the 1980s. More importantly, the paper seeks to articulate the ways in which the analysis of parrhēsia—and of the Epicureans in particular—is situated in a broader genealogy of confession, which connects Foucault's studies of ancient philosophy to his readings of Christianity and the formation of the modern technologies of power and veridiction, defining aspects of the earlier project of a History of Sexuality, as announced in the Will to Knowledge. Finally, the paper articulates a possible view on the critical import of parrhēsia in this broader genealogy of confession.

福柯的伊壁鸠鲁主义:忏悔与自我谱系
摘要:本文论述了福柯对古代哲学的探索中明显缺乏对伊壁鸠鲁主义的系统分析这一问题。考虑到皮埃尔-哈多特(Pierre Hadot)关于福柯对伊壁鸠鲁的 "hēdonē "概念的忽视存在问题的评论,本文重新审视了福柯的著作,寻找他与伊壁鸠鲁主义接触的痕迹。文章接着分析了parrhēsia这一概念在福柯作品中的起源,展示了这一概念是如何在对 "花园哲学 "的一系列分析中首次出现并得到发展的,首先是在对《梵蒂冈语录》中伊壁鸠鲁关于自然研究的观点的解读中,其次是在对菲洛德摩斯的《Peri Parrhēsias》的研究中。正是在对伊壁鸠鲁学派的一系列解读中,福柯找到了指导他在 20 世纪 80 年代研究古代哲学实践的重要理论资源之一。更重要的是,本文试图阐明对parrhēsia--尤其是对伊壁鸠鲁派--的分析是如何被置于一个更广泛的忏悔谱系中的,这个谱系将福柯对古代哲学的研究与他对基督教的解读以及现代权力和验证技术的形成联系在一起,这也是《知识意志》中所宣布的《性史》这一早期项目的定义方面。最后,本文阐述了在这一更广泛的忏悔谱系中对parrhēsia的批判性意义的可能看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ARETHUSA
ARETHUSA CLASSICS-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
期刊介绍: Arethusa is known for publishing original literary and cultural studies of the ancient world and of the field of classics that combine contemporary theoretical perspectives with more traditional approaches to literary and material evidence. Interdisciplinary in nature, this distinguished journal often features special thematic issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信