Ines Perez-Sancristobal , Paula Alvarez-Hernandez , Cristina Lajas-Petisco , Benjamin Fernandez-Gutierrez
{"title":"Effect of combined treatment with prednisone and methotrexate versus prednisone alone over laboratory parameters in giant cell arteritis","authors":"Ines Perez-Sancristobal , Paula Alvarez-Hernandez , Cristina Lajas-Petisco , Benjamin Fernandez-Gutierrez","doi":"10.1016/j.reuma.2023.09.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To compare the effect of combined treatment with prednisone and methotrexate (MTX) versus prednisone alone over laboratory parameters in giant cell arteritis (GCA).</p></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><p><span>We performed a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial about usefulness of treatment with prednisone and MTX versus prednisone and placebo in GCA (Ann Intern Med 2001;134:106–114). As a part of follow-up of patients (</span><em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->42), we performed laboratory analysis in 20 time points during the two-year period of follow-up. To analyze differences, we calculated the area under the curve (AUC) for erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), hemoglobin, and platelets, and compared the results in both groups adjusting by time of follow-up, existence of relapses and dose of prednisone.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 724 laboratory measurements were done. Median value of ESR was 33 [18–56] in patients with placebo and 26 [15–44] in patients with MTX (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.0002). No significant differences were observed in ESR during relapses. The mean ESR value followed a parallel course in both groups, but was lower in the group with MTX than in the group with placebo in 18 of 20 time points of follow-up. The AUC of ESR by time of follow-up was 28,461.7<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->12,326 in the group with placebo and 19,598.4<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->8,117 in the group with MTX (mean difference 8,863, 95% CI 1.542–16.184; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.019). The course of other laboratory parameters paralleled, without statistical significance, those observed for ESR.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>These data, along with clinical data, suggest that MTX might play a role as a disease-modifying agent in the treatment of GCA.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47115,"journal":{"name":"Reumatologia Clinica","volume":"20 2","pages":"Pages 108-112"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reumatologia Clinica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1699258X2300205X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To compare the effect of combined treatment with prednisone and methotrexate (MTX) versus prednisone alone over laboratory parameters in giant cell arteritis (GCA).
Patients and methods
We performed a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial about usefulness of treatment with prednisone and MTX versus prednisone and placebo in GCA (Ann Intern Med 2001;134:106–114). As a part of follow-up of patients (n = 42), we performed laboratory analysis in 20 time points during the two-year period of follow-up. To analyze differences, we calculated the area under the curve (AUC) for erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), hemoglobin, and platelets, and compared the results in both groups adjusting by time of follow-up, existence of relapses and dose of prednisone.
Results
A total of 724 laboratory measurements were done. Median value of ESR was 33 [18–56] in patients with placebo and 26 [15–44] in patients with MTX (P = 0.0002). No significant differences were observed in ESR during relapses. The mean ESR value followed a parallel course in both groups, but was lower in the group with MTX than in the group with placebo in 18 of 20 time points of follow-up. The AUC of ESR by time of follow-up was 28,461.7 ± 12,326 in the group with placebo and 19,598.4 ± 8,117 in the group with MTX (mean difference 8,863, 95% CI 1.542–16.184; P = 0.019). The course of other laboratory parameters paralleled, without statistical significance, those observed for ESR.
Conclusions
These data, along with clinical data, suggest that MTX might play a role as a disease-modifying agent in the treatment of GCA.
期刊介绍:
Una gran revista para cubrir eficazmente las necesidades de conocimientos en una patología de etiología, expresividad clínica y tratamiento tan amplios. Además es La Publicación Oficial de la Sociedad Española de Reumatología y del Colegio Mexicano de Reumatología y está incluida en los más prestigiosos índices de referencia en medicina.