The Political in the Anthropocene: Reflections on a Ministerial Veto, 2021

IF 2.2 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Rob Watts, Judith Bessant, Michelle Catanzaro, Philippa Collin, Stewart Jackson
{"title":"The Political in the Anthropocene: Reflections on a Ministerial Veto, 2021","authors":"Rob Watts, Judith Bessant, Michelle Catanzaro, Philippa Collin, Stewart Jackson","doi":"10.1017/aee.2023.37","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article was prompted by a Ministerial veto (2021) of the Australian Research Council’s decision to fund a research project by the authors to explore the student-led climate movement in Australia. It was also prompted by criticism of the veto which accused the Minister of bringing “politics” into what was represented as a scholarly matter. It addresses two questions: How should we understand this idea of “politics” in the context of Australian climate politics since the 1990s? Secondly it considers dominant ways of thinking about “the political” devised by ancient Greek writers and politicians which still inform the European liberal tradition. We question how fit for purpose this approach is in the Anthropocene? Our key argument is that the western tradition of thinking about “the political” is deeply anthropocentric. Historical traditions have encouraged inegalitarian and anti-democratic accounts of who can be political by excluding different kinds of people from political life. The Anthropocene requires a new, critically reflexive account of “the political” that is inclusive of people currently marginalized and excluded as well as nonhumans and nonliving components of ecosystems on which we all depend. This extends the idea of democracy beyond the human and points to a politics of climate justice.</p>","PeriodicalId":44842,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Environmental Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Environmental Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/aee.2023.37","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article was prompted by a Ministerial veto (2021) of the Australian Research Council’s decision to fund a research project by the authors to explore the student-led climate movement in Australia. It was also prompted by criticism of the veto which accused the Minister of bringing “politics” into what was represented as a scholarly matter. It addresses two questions: How should we understand this idea of “politics” in the context of Australian climate politics since the 1990s? Secondly it considers dominant ways of thinking about “the political” devised by ancient Greek writers and politicians which still inform the European liberal tradition. We question how fit for purpose this approach is in the Anthropocene? Our key argument is that the western tradition of thinking about “the political” is deeply anthropocentric. Historical traditions have encouraged inegalitarian and anti-democratic accounts of who can be political by excluding different kinds of people from political life. The Anthropocene requires a new, critically reflexive account of “the political” that is inclusive of people currently marginalized and excluded as well as nonhumans and nonliving components of ecosystems on which we all depend. This extends the idea of democracy beyond the human and points to a politics of climate justice.

人类世的政治:对部长否决权的思考,2021 年
澳大利亚研究理事会决定资助作者的一个研究项目,以探讨澳大利亚由学生领导的气候运动,但部长否决了这一决定(2021 年)。本文也是由对该否决的批评引发的,批评指责部长将 "政治 "带入了一个学术问题中。文章探讨了两个问题:在 20 世纪 90 年代以来澳大利亚气候政治的背景下,我们应该如何理解 "政治 "这一概念?其次,它考虑了由古希腊作家和政治家设计的关于 "政治 "的主流思维方式,这些思维方式仍然影响着欧洲的自由主义传统。我们质疑这种方法在人类世是否适用?我们的主要论点是,西方的 "政治 "思维传统深深地以人类为中心。历史传统将不同类型的人排除在政治生活之外,从而助长了关于谁可以成为政治人物的不平等和反民主的说法。人类世要求对 "政治 "进行新的、批判性的反思,将目前被边缘化和排斥在外的人们以及非人类和我们赖以生存的生态系统的非生物组成部分纳入其中。这将民主理念扩展到人类之外,并指向气候正义政治。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australian Journal of Environmental Education
Australian Journal of Environmental Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
18.80%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: An internationally refereed journal which publishes papers and reports on all aspects of environmental education. It presents information and argument which stimulates debate about educational strategies that enhance the kinds of awareness, understanding and actions which will promote environmental and social justice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信