Comparative Merits of Available Mortality Data Sources for Clinical Research.

AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium Pub Date : 2024-01-11 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01
Evan T Sholle, Marcos A Davila, Kristin Kostka, Sajjad Abedian, Marika Cusick, Spencer Krichevsky, Jyotishman Pathak, Thomas R Campion
{"title":"Comparative Merits of Available Mortality Data Sources for Clinical Research.","authors":"Evan T Sholle, Marcos A Davila, Kristin Kostka, Sajjad Abedian, Marika Cusick, Spencer Krichevsky, Jyotishman Pathak, Thomas R Campion","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Obtaining reliable data on patient mortality is a critical challenge facing observational researchers seeking to conduct studies using real-world data. As these analyses are conducted more broadly using newly-available sources of real-world evidence, missing data can serve as a rate-limiting factor. We conducted a comparison of mortality data sources from different stakeholder perspectives - academic medical center (AMC) informatics service providers, AMC research coordinators, industry analytics professionals, and academics - to understand the strengths and limitations of differing mortality data sources: locally generated data from sites conducting research, data provided by governmental sources, and commercially available data sets. Researchers seeking to conduct observational studies using extant data should consider these factors in sourcing outcomes data for their populations of interest.</p>","PeriodicalId":72180,"journal":{"name":"AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium","volume":"2023 ","pages":"634-640"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10785894/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Obtaining reliable data on patient mortality is a critical challenge facing observational researchers seeking to conduct studies using real-world data. As these analyses are conducted more broadly using newly-available sources of real-world evidence, missing data can serve as a rate-limiting factor. We conducted a comparison of mortality data sources from different stakeholder perspectives - academic medical center (AMC) informatics service providers, AMC research coordinators, industry analytics professionals, and academics - to understand the strengths and limitations of differing mortality data sources: locally generated data from sites conducting research, data provided by governmental sources, and commercially available data sets. Researchers seeking to conduct observational studies using extant data should consider these factors in sourcing outcomes data for their populations of interest.

现有死亡率数据源在临床研究中的优势比较。
获取可靠的患者死亡率数据是观察研究人员在利用真实世界数据开展研究时面临的一项重要挑战。随着这些分析更广泛地使用新获得的真实世界证据来源,数据缺失可能成为限制因素。我们从不同利益相关者--学术医疗中心 (AMC) 信息学服务提供者、AMC 研究协调员、行业分析专业人员和学者--的角度对死亡率数据源进行了比较,以了解不同死亡率数据源的优势和局限性:研究机构本地生成的数据、政府来源提供的数据和商业可用数据集。希望使用现有数据开展观察性研究的研究人员在为其感兴趣的人群获取结果数据时应考虑这些因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信