Placement of peripherally inserted central catheters in neonates: A retrospective study.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Nursing in Critical Care Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-15 DOI:10.1111/nicc.13003
Xiuwen Chen, Chiayen Lin, Liqing Yue, Yanjuan Tan
{"title":"Placement of peripherally inserted central catheters in neonates: A retrospective study.","authors":"Xiuwen Chen, Chiayen Lin, Liqing Yue, Yanjuan Tan","doi":"10.1111/nicc.13003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are commonly used in neonatal intensive care units for extended intravenous nutrition and therapy. The selection of PICCs insertion sites can significantly influence insertion outcomes and neonatal safety.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to determine the most suitable insertion site in the lower extremities for neonatal PICCs.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A retrospective case note review was conducted on PICCs inserted through lower extremity (LE) sites in a 40-bed tertiary-level neonatal intensive care unit at a university teaching hospital. The dates when data were accessed for research purposes were from June 2019 to June 2022. In total, 223 neonates were identified as having had PICCs, with 254 catheters inserted in the lower extremities. The STROBE checklist guided the reporting of this study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Neonates underwent PICC insertion via the LE vein, with an overall complication rate of 13.4% and a one-attempt success rate of puncture of 86.2%. The rates of complications, catheter occlusion, and catheter-related infection in the PICC group with insertion through the great saphenous vein were significantly lower than those in the femoral vein group (p < .05). The success rate was significantly higher than that in the femoral vein group (p < .05). Additionally, the incidence of total complications and catheter occlusion complications with PICC insertion via the right LE was significantly lower than that with insertion via the left LE (p < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study suggested that, when feasible, the saphenous vein in the right LE could be the most suitable insertion site for neonatal PICCs.</p><p><strong>Relevance to clinical practice: </strong>These findings provide insights into the complications, indwelling time, and safety of neonatal PICCs in different LE sites, serving as a valuable reference for clinical practice. This study was retrospective in nature, and all staff involved obtained approved access to patient clinical data. Ethical approval was granted by the Ethics Committee of Xiangya Hospital, Central South University (registry number 2022010001).</p>","PeriodicalId":51264,"journal":{"name":"Nursing in Critical Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing in Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.13003","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are commonly used in neonatal intensive care units for extended intravenous nutrition and therapy. The selection of PICCs insertion sites can significantly influence insertion outcomes and neonatal safety.

Aim: This study aimed to determine the most suitable insertion site in the lower extremities for neonatal PICCs.

Study design: A retrospective case note review was conducted on PICCs inserted through lower extremity (LE) sites in a 40-bed tertiary-level neonatal intensive care unit at a university teaching hospital. The dates when data were accessed for research purposes were from June 2019 to June 2022. In total, 223 neonates were identified as having had PICCs, with 254 catheters inserted in the lower extremities. The STROBE checklist guided the reporting of this study.

Results: Neonates underwent PICC insertion via the LE vein, with an overall complication rate of 13.4% and a one-attempt success rate of puncture of 86.2%. The rates of complications, catheter occlusion, and catheter-related infection in the PICC group with insertion through the great saphenous vein were significantly lower than those in the femoral vein group (p < .05). The success rate was significantly higher than that in the femoral vein group (p < .05). Additionally, the incidence of total complications and catheter occlusion complications with PICC insertion via the right LE was significantly lower than that with insertion via the left LE (p < .05).

Conclusion: Our study suggested that, when feasible, the saphenous vein in the right LE could be the most suitable insertion site for neonatal PICCs.

Relevance to clinical practice: These findings provide insights into the complications, indwelling time, and safety of neonatal PICCs in different LE sites, serving as a valuable reference for clinical practice. This study was retrospective in nature, and all staff involved obtained approved access to patient clinical data. Ethical approval was granted by the Ethics Committee of Xiangya Hospital, Central South University (registry number 2022010001).

新生儿外周置入中心导管的安置:回顾性研究
背景:外周插入中心导管(PICC)通常用于新生儿重症监护病房,以延长静脉营养和治疗时间。PICC插入部位的选择会对插入结果和新生儿安全产生重大影响。目的:本研究旨在确定新生儿PICC最适合的下肢插入部位:研究设计:对一家大学教学医院 40 张病床的三级新生儿重症监护病房中通过下肢 (LE) 插入的 PICC 进行了回顾性病例回顾。出于研究目的获取数据的日期为 2019 年 6 月至 2022 年 6 月。经鉴定,共有 223 名新生儿植入了 PICC,其中 254 根导管插入下肢。STROBE核对表为本研究的报告提供了指导:新生儿经 LE 静脉插入 PICC,总并发症发生率为 13.4%,一次穿刺成功率为 86.2%。经大隐静脉插入 PICC 组的并发症发生率、导管闭塞率和导管相关感染率明显低于经股静脉插入组(P 结论:我们的研究表明,在可行的情况下,经大隐静脉插入 PICC 组的并发症发生率、导管闭塞率和导管相关感染率明显低于经股静脉插入组:我们的研究表明,在可行的情况下,右腿大隐静脉可能是新生儿 PICC 最合适的插入部位:这些研究结果有助于了解新生儿 PICC 在不同左静脉置管部位的并发症、留置时间和安全性,为临床实践提供了有价值的参考。本研究为回顾性研究,所有参与研究的人员均经批准获得了患者的临床数据。本研究获得了中南大学湘雅医院伦理委员会的伦理批准(登记号:2022010001)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
13.30%
发文量
109
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing in Critical Care is an international peer-reviewed journal covering any aspect of critical care nursing practice, research, education or management. Critical care nursing is defined as the whole spectrum of skills, knowledge and attitudes utilised by practitioners in any setting where adults or children, and their families, are experiencing acute and critical illness. Such settings encompass general and specialist hospitals, and the community. Nursing in Critical Care covers the diverse specialities of critical care nursing including surgery, medicine, cardiac, renal, neurosciences, haematology, obstetrics, accident and emergency, neonatal nursing and paediatrics. Papers published in the journal normally fall into one of the following categories: -research reports -literature reviews -developments in practice, education or management -reflections on practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信