Patient knowledge of surgical informed consent and shared decision-making process among surgical patients in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.6 Q1 SURGERY
Mengistu Mera Mihiretu, Ermias Bekele, Kokeb Ayele, Lakew Asmare, Fekade Demeke Bayou, Mastewal Arefaynie, Yawkal Tsega, Abel Endawkie, Shimels Derso Kebede, Natnael Kebede
{"title":"Patient knowledge of surgical informed consent and shared decision-making process among surgical patients in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Mengistu Mera Mihiretu, Ermias Bekele, Kokeb Ayele, Lakew Asmare, Fekade Demeke Bayou, Mastewal Arefaynie, Yawkal Tsega, Abel Endawkie, Shimels Derso Kebede, Natnael Kebede","doi":"10.1186/s13037-023-00386-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Informed consent is one of the safeguarding of the patient in medical practice at different standards such as ethical, legal, and administrative purposes. Patient knowledge and perception of informed consent are one of the priority concerns in surgical procedures. Patient knowledge and perception towards informed consent increased patient satisfaction, feeling high power on their determination, and accountability for the management, and facilitated positive treatment outcomes. Despite this, in Ethiopia, there are small-scale primary studies with inconsistent and inconclusive findings. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis study estimated the pooled prevalence of patient knowledge and perception of informed consent and its determinants in Ethiopia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched major databases such as PubMed, Hinary, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Scopus, African Journal Online (AJO), Semantic Scholar, Google Scholar, google, and reference lists. Besides this, University databases in the country were also searched from August 20, 2023, until September 30, 2023,. All published and unpublished studies that report the prevalence of patient knowledge and perception toward informed consent and its associated factors were included. All studies reported in English were included. Studies conducted between January 01, 2015 to September 30, 2023 were included. There are three outcome measurements pooled level of patient knowledge towards informed consent, pooled level of patient perception towards informed consent, and pooled effect that affects patient knowledge of informed consent. Three reviewers (MMM, NK, and YT) independently screened the articles that fulfilled the inclusion criteria to avoid the risk of bias. The studies' quality was appraised using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) version.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The pooled prevalence of appropriate patient knowledge and perception towards informed consent was 32% (95% CI: 21, 43) and 40% (95% CI: 16, 65) respectively. Having formal education 2.69 (95% CI: 1.18, 6.15) and having a history of signed informed consent before 3.65 (95% CI:1.02,13.11) had a statistically significant association with good patient knowledge towards informed consent.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The appropriate patient knowledge and perception of informed consent in Ethiopia is low. Formal education and history of signed informed consent were positive factors for appropriate patient knowledge of informed consent in Ethiopia. Physicians, policymakers, and health facility managers should focus on patients without prior experience with signed informed consent and not have formal education to improve patient knowledge towards informed consent. The protocol was registered at Prospero with number CRD42023445409 and is available from: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/#myprospero .</p>","PeriodicalId":46782,"journal":{"name":"Patient Safety in Surgery","volume":"18 1","pages":"2"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10787976/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient Safety in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13037-023-00386-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Informed consent is one of the safeguarding of the patient in medical practice at different standards such as ethical, legal, and administrative purposes. Patient knowledge and perception of informed consent are one of the priority concerns in surgical procedures. Patient knowledge and perception towards informed consent increased patient satisfaction, feeling high power on their determination, and accountability for the management, and facilitated positive treatment outcomes. Despite this, in Ethiopia, there are small-scale primary studies with inconsistent and inconclusive findings. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis study estimated the pooled prevalence of patient knowledge and perception of informed consent and its determinants in Ethiopia.

Methods: We searched major databases such as PubMed, Hinary, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Scopus, African Journal Online (AJO), Semantic Scholar, Google Scholar, google, and reference lists. Besides this, University databases in the country were also searched from August 20, 2023, until September 30, 2023,. All published and unpublished studies that report the prevalence of patient knowledge and perception toward informed consent and its associated factors were included. All studies reported in English were included. Studies conducted between January 01, 2015 to September 30, 2023 were included. There are three outcome measurements pooled level of patient knowledge towards informed consent, pooled level of patient perception towards informed consent, and pooled effect that affects patient knowledge of informed consent. Three reviewers (MMM, NK, and YT) independently screened the articles that fulfilled the inclusion criteria to avoid the risk of bias. The studies' quality was appraised using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) version.

Results: The pooled prevalence of appropriate patient knowledge and perception towards informed consent was 32% (95% CI: 21, 43) and 40% (95% CI: 16, 65) respectively. Having formal education 2.69 (95% CI: 1.18, 6.15) and having a history of signed informed consent before 3.65 (95% CI:1.02,13.11) had a statistically significant association with good patient knowledge towards informed consent.

Conclusion: The appropriate patient knowledge and perception of informed consent in Ethiopia is low. Formal education and history of signed informed consent were positive factors for appropriate patient knowledge of informed consent in Ethiopia. Physicians, policymakers, and health facility managers should focus on patients without prior experience with signed informed consent and not have formal education to improve patient knowledge towards informed consent. The protocol was registered at Prospero with number CRD42023445409 and is available from: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/#myprospero .

埃塞俄比亚外科手术患者对手术知情同意和共同决策过程的了解:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:在医疗实践中,知情同意是对患者的一种保障,它涉及不同的标准,如道德、法律和行政目的。在外科手术中,患者对知情同意的了解和认知是优先考虑的问题之一。患者对知情同意的了解和认知会提高患者的满意度,使他们感到自己有很大的决定权,对管理负责,并促进积极的治疗效果。尽管如此,埃塞俄比亚仍有一些小规模的初步研究,其结果不一致,也没有定论。因此,本系统综述和荟萃分析研究估算了埃塞俄比亚患者对知情同意及其决定因素的了解和认知的总体流行率:我们检索了主要数据库,如 PubMed、Hinary、MEDLINE、Cochrane Library、EMBASE、Scopus、African Journal Online (AJO)、Semantic Scholar、Google Scholar、google 和参考文献列表。此外,还检索了从 2023 年 8 月 20 日至 2023 年 9 月 30 日的国内大学数据库。所有已发表和未发表的、报告患者对知情同意及其相关因素的了解和看法的研究均被纳入。纳入所有以英语报告的研究。纳入2015年1月1日至2023年9月30日期间进行的研究。共有三项结果测量:患者对知情同意的总体知识水平、患者对知情同意的总体认知水平以及影响患者知情同意知识的总体效应。三位审稿人(MMM、NK 和 YT)独立筛选了符合纳入标准的文章,以避免偏倚风险。研究质量采用修订版纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS)进行评估:患者对知情同意的适当知识和认知的总体流行率分别为 32% (95% CI: 21, 43) 和 40% (95% CI: 16, 65)。受过正规教育 2.69 (95% CI: 1.18, 6.15)、曾签署过知情同意书 3.65 (95% CI:1.02, 13.11)与患者对知情同意书的良好认知有显著统计学关系:结论:在埃塞俄比亚,患者对知情同意的了解和认知程度较低。在埃塞俄比亚,正规教育和签署知情同意书的历史是患者适当了解知情同意的积极因素。医生、政策制定者和医疗机构管理者应将重点放在没有签署知情同意书经历的患者身上,而不是通过正规教育来提高患者对知情同意书的认识。该方案已在 Prospero 注册,编号为 CRD42023445409,可从以下网址获取:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/#myprospero 。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.10%
发文量
37
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信