Seraph 100 Microbind Affinity Blood Filter Does Not Clear Antibiotics: An Analysis of Antibiotic Concentration Data from PURIFY-OBS.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 HEMATOLOGY
Blood Purification Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-13 DOI:10.1159/000531951
Jesse P DeLuca, Daniel J Selig, Pooja Vir, Chau V Vuong, Jeffrey Della-Volpe, Ian M Rivera, Caroline Park, Benjamin Levi, Kathleen P Pratt, Ian J Stewart
{"title":"Seraph 100 Microbind Affinity Blood Filter Does Not Clear Antibiotics: An Analysis of Antibiotic Concentration Data from PURIFY-OBS.","authors":"Jesse P DeLuca, Daniel J Selig, Pooja Vir, Chau V Vuong, Jeffrey Della-Volpe, Ian M Rivera, Caroline Park, Benjamin Levi, Kathleen P Pratt, Ian J Stewart","doi":"10.1159/000531951","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Novel hemoperfusion systems are emerging for the treatment of sepsis. These devices can directly remove pathogens, pathogen-associated molecular patterns, cytokines, and other inflammatory markers from circulation. However, significant safety concerns such as potential antibiotic clearance need to be addressed prior to these devices being used in large clinical studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective, observational study of 34 participants undergoing treatment with the Seraph 100® Microbind Affinity Blood Filter (Seraph 100) device at 6 participating sites in the USA. Patients were included for analysis if they had a record of receiving an antibiotic concurrent with Seraph 100 treatment. Patients were excluded if there was missing information for blood flow rate. Blood samples were drawn pre- and post-filter at 1 h and 4 h after treatment initiation. These average pre- and post-filter time-concentration observations were then used to estimate antibiotic clearance in L/h (CLSeraph) due to the Seraph 100 device.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 34 participants in the study, 17 met inclusion and exclusion criteria for the antibiotic analysis. Data were obtained for 7 antibiotics (azithromycin, cefazolin, cefepime, ceftriaxone, linezolid, piperacillin, and vancomycin) and one beta-lactamase inhibitor. Mean CLSeraph for the antibiotics investigated ranged from -0.57 to 0.47 L/h. No antibiotic had a CLSeraph statistically significant from 0.</p><p><strong>Discussion/conclusion: </strong>The Seraph 100 did not significantly clear any measured antibiotic in clinical samples. These data give further evidence to suggest that these therapies may be safely administered to critically ill patients and will not impact concentrations of administered antibiotics.</p>","PeriodicalId":8953,"journal":{"name":"Blood Purification","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Purification","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000531951","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Novel hemoperfusion systems are emerging for the treatment of sepsis. These devices can directly remove pathogens, pathogen-associated molecular patterns, cytokines, and other inflammatory markers from circulation. However, significant safety concerns such as potential antibiotic clearance need to be addressed prior to these devices being used in large clinical studies.

Methods: Prospective, observational study of 34 participants undergoing treatment with the Seraph 100® Microbind Affinity Blood Filter (Seraph 100) device at 6 participating sites in the USA. Patients were included for analysis if they had a record of receiving an antibiotic concurrent with Seraph 100 treatment. Patients were excluded if there was missing information for blood flow rate. Blood samples were drawn pre- and post-filter at 1 h and 4 h after treatment initiation. These average pre- and post-filter time-concentration observations were then used to estimate antibiotic clearance in L/h (CLSeraph) due to the Seraph 100 device.

Results: Of the 34 participants in the study, 17 met inclusion and exclusion criteria for the antibiotic analysis. Data were obtained for 7 antibiotics (azithromycin, cefazolin, cefepime, ceftriaxone, linezolid, piperacillin, and vancomycin) and one beta-lactamase inhibitor. Mean CLSeraph for the antibiotics investigated ranged from -0.57 to 0.47 L/h. No antibiotic had a CLSeraph statistically significant from 0.

Discussion/conclusion: The Seraph 100 did not significantly clear any measured antibiotic in clinical samples. These data give further evidence to suggest that these therapies may be safely administered to critically ill patients and will not impact concentrations of administered antibiotics.

Seraph 100 微粘附亲和血液过滤器无法清除抗生素:PURIFY-OBS 抗生素浓度数据分析。
简介:用于治疗败血症的新型血液灌流系统不断涌现。这些设备可直接清除血液循环中的病原体、病原体相关分子模式、细胞因子和其他炎症标志物。然而,在将这些设备用于大型临床研究之前,需要解决潜在的抗生素清除等重大安全问题:前瞻性观察研究:在美国 6 个参与研究的机构对 34 名接受 Seraph 100® Microbind Affinity 血液过滤器(Seraph 100)治疗的患者进行观察。如果患者在接受赛拉弗 100 治疗的同时有接受抗生素治疗的记录,则纳入分析范围。如果血流量信息缺失,则排除患者。在开始治疗后一小时和四小时分别抽取过滤前和过滤后的血液样本。然后,利用这些过滤器前后的平均时间浓度观测值来估算瑟拉弗 100 设备的抗生素清除率,单位为升/小时(CLSeraph):在 34 位参与研究的人员中,有 17 位符合抗生素分析的纳入和排除标准。获得了 7 种抗生素(阿奇霉素、头孢唑啉、头孢吡肟、头孢曲松、利奈唑胺、哌拉西林和万古霉素)和 1 种β-内酰胺酶抑制剂的数据。所研究抗生素的平均 CLSeraph 值介于 -0.57 至 0.47 升/小时之间。没有一种抗生素的 CLSeraph 在统计学上显著低于 0.0:Seraph 100 不能明显清除临床样本中的任何抗生素。这些数据进一步证明,危重病人可以安全地使用这些疗法,而且不会影响抗生素的浓度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Blood Purification
Blood Purification 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.30%
发文量
69
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Practical information on hemodialysis, hemofiltration, peritoneal dialysis and apheresis is featured in this journal. Recognizing the critical importance of equipment and procedures, particular emphasis has been placed on reports, drawn from a wide range of fields, describing technical advances and improvements in methodology. Papers reflect the search for cost-effective solutions which increase not only patient survival but also patient comfort and disease improvement through prevention or correction of undesirable effects. Advances in vascular access and blood anticoagulation, problems associated with exposure of blood to foreign surfaces and acute-care nephrology, including continuous therapies, also receive attention. Nephrologists, internists, intensivists and hospital staff involved in dialysis, apheresis and immunoadsorption for acute and chronic solid organ failure will find this journal useful and informative. ''Blood Purification'' also serves as a platform for multidisciplinary experiences involving nephrologists, cardiologists and critical care physicians in order to expand the level of interaction between different disciplines and specialities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信