Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Older Patients With Stage III Colorectal Cancer: A Real-World Analysis of Treatment Recommendations, Treatment Administered and Impact on Cancer Recurrence
IF 4.3 3区 材料科学Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Oliver Piercey , Hui-Li Wong , Clara Leung , Yat Hang To , Valerie Heong , Margaret Lee , Jeanne Tie , Malcolm Steel , Justin M. Yeung , Jacob McCormick , Peter Gibbs , Rachel Wong
{"title":"Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Older Patients With Stage III Colorectal Cancer: A Real-World Analysis of Treatment Recommendations, Treatment Administered and Impact on Cancer Recurrence","authors":"Oliver Piercey , Hui-Li Wong , Clara Leung , Yat Hang To , Valerie Heong , Margaret Lee , Jeanne Tie , Malcolm Steel , Justin M. Yeung , Jacob McCormick , Peter Gibbs , Rachel Wong","doi":"10.1016/j.clcc.2024.01.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p><span>A substantial proportion of patients with stage III colorectal cancer (CRC) are older than 70 years. Optimal adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) for older patients (OP) continues to be debated, with subgroup analyses of randomized trials not demonstrating a survival benefit from the addition of </span>oxaliplatin<span><span> to a fluoropyrimidine </span>backbone.</span></p></div><div><h3>Patients and Methods</h3><p>We analyzed the multisite Australian ACCORD registry, which prospectively collects patient, tumor and treatment data along with long term clinical follow-up. We compared OP (≥70) with stage III CRC to younger patients ([YP] <70), including the proportion recommended AC and any reasons for not prescribing AC. AC administration, regimen choice, completion rates, and survival outcomes were also examined.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>One thousand five hundred twelve patients enrolled in the ACCORD registry from 2005 to 2018 were included. Median follow-up was 57.0 months. Compared to the 827 YP, the 685 OP were less likely to be offered AC (71.5% vs. 96.5%, <em>P</em> < .0001) and when offered, were more likely to decline treatment (15.1% vs. 2.8%, <em>P</em> < .0001). Ultimately, 60.0% of OP and 93.7% of YP received AC (<em>P</em> < .0001). OP were less likely to receive oxaliplatin (27.5% vs. 84.7%, <em>P</em> < .0001) and to complete AC (75.9% vs. 85.7%, <em>P</em> < .0001). The probability of remaining recurrence-free was significantly higher in OP who received AC compared to those not treated (HR 0.73, <em>P</em> = .04) but not significantly improved with the addition of oxaliplatin (HR 0.75, <em>P</em> = .18).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>OP were less likely than YP to receive AC. Receipt of AC reduced recurrences in OP, supporting its use, although no significant benefit was observed from the addition of oxaliplatin.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S153300282400001X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
A substantial proportion of patients with stage III colorectal cancer (CRC) are older than 70 years. Optimal adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) for older patients (OP) continues to be debated, with subgroup analyses of randomized trials not demonstrating a survival benefit from the addition of oxaliplatin to a fluoropyrimidine backbone.
Patients and Methods
We analyzed the multisite Australian ACCORD registry, which prospectively collects patient, tumor and treatment data along with long term clinical follow-up. We compared OP (≥70) with stage III CRC to younger patients ([YP] <70), including the proportion recommended AC and any reasons for not prescribing AC. AC administration, regimen choice, completion rates, and survival outcomes were also examined.
Results
One thousand five hundred twelve patients enrolled in the ACCORD registry from 2005 to 2018 were included. Median follow-up was 57.0 months. Compared to the 827 YP, the 685 OP were less likely to be offered AC (71.5% vs. 96.5%, P < .0001) and when offered, were more likely to decline treatment (15.1% vs. 2.8%, P < .0001). Ultimately, 60.0% of OP and 93.7% of YP received AC (P < .0001). OP were less likely to receive oxaliplatin (27.5% vs. 84.7%, P < .0001) and to complete AC (75.9% vs. 85.7%, P < .0001). The probability of remaining recurrence-free was significantly higher in OP who received AC compared to those not treated (HR 0.73, P = .04) but not significantly improved with the addition of oxaliplatin (HR 0.75, P = .18).
Conclusion
OP were less likely than YP to receive AC. Receipt of AC reduced recurrences in OP, supporting its use, although no significant benefit was observed from the addition of oxaliplatin.
背景III期结直肠癌(CRC)患者中有相当一部分年龄超过70岁。针对老年患者(OP)的最佳辅助化疗(AC)仍存在争议,随机试验的亚组分析并未显示在氟嘧啶类药物基础上加用奥沙利铂可提高生存率。我们将 III 期 CRC 的 OP(≥70 岁)患者与年轻患者[(YP) <70]进行了比较,包括推荐 AC 的比例以及不开 AC 的原因。此外,还对 AC 的用药、方案选择、完成率和生存结果进行了研究。结果纳入了 2005 年至 2018 年 ACCORD 登记的 1512 例患者。中位随访时间为 57.0 个月。与 827 名青年患者相比,685 名 OP 患者获得 AC 治疗的可能性较低(71.5% vs 96.5%,p<0.0001),而且在获得 AC 治疗时,他们更有可能拒绝接受治疗(15.1% vs 2.8%,p<0.0001)。最终,60.0% 的 OP 和 93.7% 的 YP 接受了 AC(p<0.0001)。OP 接受奥沙利铂治疗(27.5% vs 84.7%,p<0.0001)和完成 AC 治疗(75.9% vs 85.7%,p<0.0001)的几率较低。与未接受治疗的患者相比,接受 AC 治疗的 OP 患者不再复发的概率明显更高(HR 0.73,p=0.04),但加用奥沙利铂后复发概率并无明显改善(HR 0.75,p=0.18)。老年患者在 III 期结直肠癌患者中占很大比例,但大部分被排除在前瞻性随机试验之外。在这项多中心回顾性分析中,我们发现尽管辅助化疗可降低癌症复发率,但与年轻患者相比,老年患者接受辅助化疗的可能性明显较低,而且更有可能拒绝接受辅助化疗。