Inside Out: Early Modern Domestic Tragedy and the Dramaturgy of Extrusion

Emma K. Atwood
{"title":"Inside Out: Early Modern Domestic Tragedy and the Dramaturgy of Extrusion","authors":"Emma K. Atwood","doi":"10.1353/sli.2021.a917129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> Inside Out: <span>Early Modern Domestic Tragedy and the Dramaturgy of Extrusion</span> <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Emma K. Atwood (bio) </li> </ul> <p>Domestic tragedy has constituted a distinct genre of study for the past hundred years, beginning with a 1925 dissertation by Edward Ayers Taylor, who sought to categorize a number of largely forgotten and lost plays (Orlin, “Domestic” 390). Since the 1980s and into the twenty-first century, scholars like Catherine Belsey, Lena Cowen Orlin, Laura Gowing, Catherine Richardson, and Ann Christensen have offered a series of exciting approaches to the genre and its constitutive relationship to early modern culture. In her recent monograph <em>Separation Scenes: Domestic Drama in Early Modern England</em>, Christensen clearly defines the genre:</p> <blockquote> <p>popular at the end of the sixteenth century and most often set in contemporary England, domestic tragedy is a generic grouping that modern scholars have recognized for a number of innovations: chiefly the middling or bourgeois status of their characters and concerns (as distinct from the nobility and the poor); a “reduction in scale” from tragedies of state; and the violent, often “true” crimes depicted.</p> (4) </blockquote> <p>In short, she explains, these plays stage “domestic life in crisis” (<em>Separation</em> 5). This depiction of domestic crisis has proved especially useful for scholars invested in questions related to early modern gender, class, violence, and the economies of everyday life. As Orlin notes in her overview “Domestic Tragedy: Private Life on the Public Stage,” “in a growing body of scholarship, domestic tragedy has since proved itself to be a site in which historicist, feminist, and materialist approaches are profitably practiced” (“Domestic” 392). Entire seminars are now being offered on the topic, like Ellen MacKay’s 2022 course “Housekeeping: Domestic Drama and Material Culture” at the University of Chicago. And Emma Whipday’s recent monograph <em>Shakespeare’s Domestic Tragedies: Violence in the Early Modern Home</em> has sought to bring this genre into conversation with more mainstream Shakespearean plays such as <em>Othello, Hamlet, The Taming of the Shrew,</em> and <em>King Lear</em>. <strong>[End Page 1]</strong></p> <p><em>Arden of Faversham, A Warning for Fair Women, Two Lamentable Tragedies 1</em> and <em>2, Edward IV</em>, <em>A Yorkshire Tragedy, A Woman Killed with Kindness</em>, and <em>The Witch of Edmonton</em> make up the core canon of domestic tragedy (Orlin, “Domestic” 391). But despite the rich and persistent scholarly interest in the genre, these plays are rarely staged. <em>Arden</em> has perhaps had the most theatrical luck, likely stemming from its association with Shakespeare: the Royal Shakespeare Company offered an <em>Arden</em> in 1982 and again in 2014; the Boston University company Willing Suspensions staged <em>Arden</em> in 2014; the Resurgens Theatre Company in Georgia staged a four-day run of <em>Arden</em> in 2017 and remounted this production for a three-day run during their Death and Domesticity Conference in 2018; Santa Fe Summer Shakespeare offered a script-in-hand reading of <em>Arden</em> in 2020; and the off-broadway Red Bull Theater offered a high-profile <em>Arden</em> in 2023. <em>A Woman Killed with Kindness</em> was staged by the Royal Shakespeare Company in 1991, but it wasn’t staged again until twenty years later with a 2011 National Theater production. In 2014, University College London staged an academic parts performance of <em>Two Lamentable Tragedies</em>, documented in a scholarly article by Whipday and Freyja Cox Jensen. And it was not until 2018 that Resurgens finally brought <em>A Warning for Fair Women</em> back to the stage, the first time this play had been performed in over 400 years.</p> <p>If, as the growing body of scholarship suggests, domestic tragedies can offer a significant contribution to our understanding of early modern culture, and if this understanding is deeply rooted in an understanding of domestic space, might they not also offer a significant contribution to our understanding of early modern dramaturgy, itself a spatial art form? If we aren’t staging these plays, we are likely missing insights evident in rehearsal and performance but largely invisible on the page or in the classroom.</p> <p>Ultimately, I’d like to suggest that the genre of domestic tragedy doesn’t only function as an intriguing cultural mirror in regards to its engagement with such pressing social issues as gender and class, credit and capitalism, crime and punishment, but can—and should—be studied for its...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":501368,"journal":{"name":"Studies in the Literary Imagination","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in the Literary Imagination","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/sli.2021.a917129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

  • Inside Out: Early Modern Domestic Tragedy and the Dramaturgy of Extrusion
  • Emma K. Atwood (bio)

Domestic tragedy has constituted a distinct genre of study for the past hundred years, beginning with a 1925 dissertation by Edward Ayers Taylor, who sought to categorize a number of largely forgotten and lost plays (Orlin, “Domestic” 390). Since the 1980s and into the twenty-first century, scholars like Catherine Belsey, Lena Cowen Orlin, Laura Gowing, Catherine Richardson, and Ann Christensen have offered a series of exciting approaches to the genre and its constitutive relationship to early modern culture. In her recent monograph Separation Scenes: Domestic Drama in Early Modern England, Christensen clearly defines the genre:

popular at the end of the sixteenth century and most often set in contemporary England, domestic tragedy is a generic grouping that modern scholars have recognized for a number of innovations: chiefly the middling or bourgeois status of their characters and concerns (as distinct from the nobility and the poor); a “reduction in scale” from tragedies of state; and the violent, often “true” crimes depicted.

(4)

In short, she explains, these plays stage “domestic life in crisis” (Separation 5). This depiction of domestic crisis has proved especially useful for scholars invested in questions related to early modern gender, class, violence, and the economies of everyday life. As Orlin notes in her overview “Domestic Tragedy: Private Life on the Public Stage,” “in a growing body of scholarship, domestic tragedy has since proved itself to be a site in which historicist, feminist, and materialist approaches are profitably practiced” (“Domestic” 392). Entire seminars are now being offered on the topic, like Ellen MacKay’s 2022 course “Housekeeping: Domestic Drama and Material Culture” at the University of Chicago. And Emma Whipday’s recent monograph Shakespeare’s Domestic Tragedies: Violence in the Early Modern Home has sought to bring this genre into conversation with more mainstream Shakespearean plays such as Othello, Hamlet, The Taming of the Shrew, and King Lear. [End Page 1]

Arden of Faversham, A Warning for Fair Women, Two Lamentable Tragedies 1 and 2, Edward IV, A Yorkshire Tragedy, A Woman Killed with Kindness, and The Witch of Edmonton make up the core canon of domestic tragedy (Orlin, “Domestic” 391). But despite the rich and persistent scholarly interest in the genre, these plays are rarely staged. Arden has perhaps had the most theatrical luck, likely stemming from its association with Shakespeare: the Royal Shakespeare Company offered an Arden in 1982 and again in 2014; the Boston University company Willing Suspensions staged Arden in 2014; the Resurgens Theatre Company in Georgia staged a four-day run of Arden in 2017 and remounted this production for a three-day run during their Death and Domesticity Conference in 2018; Santa Fe Summer Shakespeare offered a script-in-hand reading of Arden in 2020; and the off-broadway Red Bull Theater offered a high-profile Arden in 2023. A Woman Killed with Kindness was staged by the Royal Shakespeare Company in 1991, but it wasn’t staged again until twenty years later with a 2011 National Theater production. In 2014, University College London staged an academic parts performance of Two Lamentable Tragedies, documented in a scholarly article by Whipday and Freyja Cox Jensen. And it was not until 2018 that Resurgens finally brought A Warning for Fair Women back to the stage, the first time this play had been performed in over 400 years.

If, as the growing body of scholarship suggests, domestic tragedies can offer a significant contribution to our understanding of early modern culture, and if this understanding is deeply rooted in an understanding of domestic space, might they not also offer a significant contribution to our understanding of early modern dramaturgy, itself a spatial art form? If we aren’t staging these plays, we are likely missing insights evident in rehearsal and performance but largely invisible on the page or in the classroom.

Ultimately, I’d like to suggest that the genre of domestic tragedy doesn’t only function as an intriguing cultural mirror in regards to its engagement with such pressing social issues as gender and class, credit and capitalism, crime and punishment, but can—and should—be studied for its...

由内而外早期现代家庭悲剧与 "挤出 "戏剧学
以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要: Inside Out:艾玛-K.-阿特伍德(Emma K. Atwood)(简历)家庭悲剧在过去的一百年中构成了一个独特的研究流派,这始于爱德华-艾尔斯-泰勒(Edward Ayers Taylor)1925 年的一篇论文,他试图将一些基本被遗忘和遗失的戏剧进行分类(奥林,《家庭》390)。自 20 世纪 80 年代进入 21 世纪以来,凯瑟琳-贝尔西(Catherine Belsey)、莉娜-考文-奥林(Lena Cowen Orlin)、劳拉-高英(Laura Gowing)、凯瑟琳-理查森(Catherine Richardson)和安-克里斯滕森(Ann Christensen)等学者对这一体裁及其与早期现代文化的构成关系提出了一系列令人兴奋的研究方法。在她最近的专著《分离场景:早期英国的家庭戏剧》(Separation Scenes:克里斯滕森在她最近的专著《分离场景:现代早期英格兰的家庭戏剧》中明确定义了这一流派:家庭悲剧流行于 16 世纪末,最常见的背景是当代英格兰,是一个现代学者公认的具有诸多创新意义的类型:主要是其人物和关注点的中产阶级或资产阶级地位(有别于贵族和穷人);与国家悲剧相比 "规模缩小";以及所描绘的暴力犯罪,通常是 "真实的 "犯罪。(4) 简而言之,她解释说,这些戏剧上演的是 "危机中的家庭生活"(《分离》第 5 章)。事实证明,这种对家庭危机的描写对研究现代早期性别、阶级、暴力和日常生活经济等相关问题的学者特别有用。正如奥林在《家庭悲剧:公共舞台上的私人生活》(Domestic Tragedy:正如 Orlin 在她的综述《家庭悲剧:公共舞台上的私人生活》中所指出的,"在越来越多的学术研究中,家庭悲剧已被证明是历史主义、女权主义和唯物主义研究方法的有益实践场所"(《家庭》392)。现在,整个研讨会都在讨论这个话题,比如埃伦-麦凯(Ellen MacKay)在 2022 年开设的 "家务管理 "课程:家庭戏剧与物质文化"。艾玛-惠普迪(Emma Whipday)最近出版了专著《莎士比亚的家庭悲剧》(Shakespeare's Domestic Tragedies):而 Emma Whipday 最近的专著《莎士比亚的家庭悲剧:早期现代家庭中的暴力》(Shakespeare's Domestic Tragedies: Violence in the Early Modern Home)则试图将这一体裁与《奥赛罗》、《哈姆雷特》、《驯悍记》和《李尔王》等更主流的莎士比亚戏剧进行对话。[末页 1]《费弗逊的阿登》、《对美丽女人的警告》、《两个可悲的悲剧 1 和 2》、《爱德华四世》、《约克郡的悲剧》、《被善良杀死的女人》和《埃德蒙顿的女巫》构成了家庭悲剧的核心典范(Orlin, "Domestic" 391)。但是,尽管学者们对这一体裁有着浓厚而持久的兴趣,这些戏剧却很少上演。阿登也许是最幸运的剧作家,这可能源于它与莎士比亚的渊源:英国皇家莎士比亚剧团于 1982 年上演了《阿登》,并于 2014 年再次上演;波士顿大学的 Willing Suspensions 剧团于 2014 年上演了《阿登》;佐治亚州的 Resurgens 剧团于 2017 年上演了为期四天的《阿登》,并于 2018 年在其 "死亡与家庭 "会议期间重新上演了这部作品,为期三天;圣塔菲夏季莎士比亚剧团于 2020 年上演了《阿登》的手抄剧本朗读;外百老汇红牛剧院于 2023 年上演了一部备受瞩目的《阿登》。1991年,英国皇家莎士比亚剧团上演了《被善良杀死的女人》,但直到20年后的2011年,国家剧院才再次上演该剧。2014 年,伦敦大学学院上演了《两个可悲的悲剧》的学术部分,维普戴和弗雷亚-考克斯-詹森的一篇学术文章对此进行了记录。而直到 2018 年,雷瑟根斯终于将《对美丽女性的警告》重新搬上舞台,这也是该剧 400 多年来的首次演出。如果正如越来越多的学术研究所表明的那样,家庭悲剧可以为我们理解早期现代文化做出重要贡献,如果这种理解深深植根于对家庭空间的理解,那么它们是否也可以为我们理解早期现代戏剧--本身就是一种空间艺术形式--做出重要贡献呢?如果我们不上演这些戏剧,我们很可能会错过在排练和演出中显而易见,但在书页上或课堂上却基本看不到的见解。归根结底,我想说的是,家庭悲剧这一体裁不仅是一面引人入胜的文化镜子,照出了性别与阶级、信贷与资本主义、犯罪与惩罚等紧迫的社会问题,而且可以--也应该--研究它的......
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信