Influence of carrier water pH and hardness on imazapic efficacy for sicklepod (Senna obtusifolia L.) control in peanut

IF 1.3 3区 农林科学 Q3 AGRONOMY
Olumide S. Daramola, Gregory E. MacDonald, Ramdas G. Kanissery, Barry L. Tillman, Hardeep Singh, Pratap Devkota
{"title":"Influence of carrier water pH and hardness on imazapic efficacy for sicklepod (Senna obtusifolia L.) control in peanut","authors":"Olumide S. Daramola, Gregory E. MacDonald, Ramdas G. Kanissery, Barry L. Tillman, Hardeep Singh, Pratap Devkota","doi":"10.1017/wet.2023.96","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Carrier water quality is an important consideration for herbicide efficacy. Field and greenhouse studies were conducted from 2021 to 2023 to evaluate the effect of carrier water pH and hardness on imazapic efficacy for sicklepod control in peanut. Imazapic was applied postemergence at 0.071 kg a.i ha<jats:sup>-1</jats:sup> with carrier water pH levels (5, 6, 7, 8 or 9); and hardness levels: 0 (deionized water), 100, 200, 400 or 500 mg L<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> of CaCO<jats:sub>3</jats:sub> equivalent in separate field experiments. In greenhouse experiments, imazapic was applied to either 10-cm, 15-cm, or 20-cm-tall sicklepod at similar carrier water pH levels and hardness 0, 100, 200, 400, or 800 mg L<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> of CaCO<jats:sub>3</jats:sub>. In the field study, sicklepod control, density and biomass reductions were lower with carrier water pH 5 or 9 compared with pH 7. In the greenhouse study, control was not different among carrier water pH levels when imazapic was applied to 10-cm sicklepod; however, when applied to 15-cm or 20-cm sicklepod, control was at least 25% greater with acidic (pH 5) compared with alkaline (pH 9) carrier water. Results from the field study showed that carrier water hardness ≤500 ppm did not reduce imazapic efficacy for sicklepod control. In the greenhouse study, regardless of sicklepod height, carrier water hardness 800 mg L<jats:sup>-1</jats:sup> reduced sicklepod control by 15% and biomass reduction by 17% compared with deionized water (pH 7). The effects of carrier water pH and hardness on imazapic efficacy did not compromise peanut yield in the field study. However, this study indicates both acidic and alkaline carrier water pH and hardness (800 mg L<jats:sup>-1</jats:sup> CaCO<jats:sub>3</jats:sub> L<jats:sup>-1</jats:sup>) has the potential to reduce imazapic efficacy on sicklepod, and appropriate spray solution amendments maybe be needed to maintain optimum efficacy.","PeriodicalId":23710,"journal":{"name":"Weed Technology","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Weed Technology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2023.96","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Carrier water quality is an important consideration for herbicide efficacy. Field and greenhouse studies were conducted from 2021 to 2023 to evaluate the effect of carrier water pH and hardness on imazapic efficacy for sicklepod control in peanut. Imazapic was applied postemergence at 0.071 kg a.i ha-1 with carrier water pH levels (5, 6, 7, 8 or 9); and hardness levels: 0 (deionized water), 100, 200, 400 or 500 mg L−1 of CaCO3 equivalent in separate field experiments. In greenhouse experiments, imazapic was applied to either 10-cm, 15-cm, or 20-cm-tall sicklepod at similar carrier water pH levels and hardness 0, 100, 200, 400, or 800 mg L−1 of CaCO3. In the field study, sicklepod control, density and biomass reductions were lower with carrier water pH 5 or 9 compared with pH 7. In the greenhouse study, control was not different among carrier water pH levels when imazapic was applied to 10-cm sicklepod; however, when applied to 15-cm or 20-cm sicklepod, control was at least 25% greater with acidic (pH 5) compared with alkaline (pH 9) carrier water. Results from the field study showed that carrier water hardness ≤500 ppm did not reduce imazapic efficacy for sicklepod control. In the greenhouse study, regardless of sicklepod height, carrier water hardness 800 mg L-1 reduced sicklepod control by 15% and biomass reduction by 17% compared with deionized water (pH 7). The effects of carrier water pH and hardness on imazapic efficacy did not compromise peanut yield in the field study. However, this study indicates both acidic and alkaline carrier water pH and hardness (800 mg L-1 CaCO3 L-1) has the potential to reduce imazapic efficacy on sicklepod, and appropriate spray solution amendments maybe be needed to maintain optimum efficacy.
载体水 pH 值和硬度对咪鲜胺防治花生镰刀菌药效的影响
载体水质是除草剂药效的一个重要考虑因素。2021 年至 2023 年期间进行了田间和温室研究,以评估载体水的 pH 值和硬度对控制花生镰刀菌药效的影响。在不同的田间试验中,以 0.071 kg a.i ha-1 的剂量在出苗后施用咪草烟,载体水的 pH 值为 5、6、7、8 或 9;硬度为 0(去离子水)、100、200、400 或 500 mg L-1 CaCO3 当量。在温室实验中,在类似的载体水 pH 值和 0、100、200、400 或 800 毫克/升 CaCO3 的硬度条件下,对 10 厘米、15 厘米或 20 厘米高的镰刀菌施用咪草烟。在田间研究中,与 pH 值为 7 的载体水相比,pH 值为 5 或 9 的载体水对镰刀菌的控制率、密度和生物量减少率较低。 在温室研究中,当对 10 厘米高的镰刀菌施用咪鲜胺时,不同 pH 值的载体水对镰刀菌的控制率没有差异;但当对 15 厘米或 20 厘米高的镰刀菌施用咪鲜胺时,酸性(pH 值为 5)载体水对镰刀菌的控制率比碱性(pH 值为 9)载体水高至少 25%。田间研究结果表明,载体水硬度低于 500 ppm 不会降低咪鲜胺对镰刀菌的防治效果。在温室研究中,与去离子水(pH 值为 7)相比,无论镰刀菌高度如何,载体水硬度为 800 mg L-1 的镰刀菌控制率降低了 15%,生物量降低了 17%。在田间研究中,载体水的 pH 值和硬度对咪鲜胺药效的影响不会影响花生产量。不过,这项研究表明,酸性和碱性载体水的 pH 值和硬度(800 毫克/升 CaCO3 L-1)都有可能降低咪鲜胺对镰刀菌的药效,因此可能需要对喷洒溶液进行适当调整,以保持最佳药效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Weed Technology
Weed Technology 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
21.40%
发文量
89
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Weed Technology publishes original research and scholarship in the form of peer-reviewed articles focused on understanding how weeds are managed. The journal focuses on: - Applied aspects concerning the management of weeds in agricultural systems - Herbicides used to manage undesired vegetation, weed biology and control - Weed/crop management systems - Reports of new weed problems -New technologies for weed management and special articles emphasizing technology transfer to improve weed control -Articles dealing with plant growth regulators and management of undesired plant growth may also be accepted, provided there is clear relevance to weed science technology, e.g., turfgrass or woody plant management along rights-of-way, vegetation management in forest, aquatic, or other non-crop situations. -Surveys, education, and extension topics related to weeds will also be considered
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信