Terrestrial laser scanning vs. manual methods for assessing complex forest stand structure: a comparative analysis on plenter forests

IF 2.6 2区 农林科学 Q1 FORESTRY
{"title":"Terrestrial laser scanning vs. manual methods for assessing complex forest stand structure: a comparative analysis on plenter forests","authors":"","doi":"10.1007/s10342-023-01641-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Abstract</h3> <p>In continuous cover forestry, plenter silviculture is regarded as an elaborated system for optimizing the sustainable production of high-quality timber maintaining a constant but heterogeneous canopy. Its complexity necessitates high silvicultural expertise and a detailed assessment of forest stand structural variables. Terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) can offer reliable techniques for long-term tree mapping, volume calculation, and stand variables assessment in complex forest structures. We conducted surveys using both automated TLS and conventional manual methods (CMM) on two plots with contrasting silvicultural regimes within the Black Forest, Germany. Variations in automated tree detection and stand variables were greater between different TLS surveys than with CMM. TLS detected an average of 523 tree stems per hectare, while CMM counted 516. Approximately 9.6% of trees identified with TLS were commission errors, with 6.5% of CMM trees being omitted using TLS. Basal area per hectare was slightly higher in TLS (38.9 m<sup>3</sup>) than in CMM (38.2 m<sup>3</sup>). However, CMM recorded a greater standing volume (492.7 m<sup>3</sup>) than TLS (440.5 m<sup>3</sup>). The discrepancy in stand volume between methods was primarily due to TLS underestimating tree height, especially for taller trees. DBH bias was minor at 1 cm between methods. Repeated TLS inventories successfully matched an average of 424 tree positions per hectare. While TLS adequately characterizes complex plenter forest structures, we propose enhancing this methodology with personal laser scanning to optimize crown coverage and efficiency and direct volume measurements for increased accuracy of wood volume estimations. Additionally, utilizing 3D point cloud data-derived metrics, such as structural complexity indices, can further enhance plenter forest management.</p>","PeriodicalId":11996,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Forest Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Forest Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-023-01641-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In continuous cover forestry, plenter silviculture is regarded as an elaborated system for optimizing the sustainable production of high-quality timber maintaining a constant but heterogeneous canopy. Its complexity necessitates high silvicultural expertise and a detailed assessment of forest stand structural variables. Terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) can offer reliable techniques for long-term tree mapping, volume calculation, and stand variables assessment in complex forest structures. We conducted surveys using both automated TLS and conventional manual methods (CMM) on two plots with contrasting silvicultural regimes within the Black Forest, Germany. Variations in automated tree detection and stand variables were greater between different TLS surveys than with CMM. TLS detected an average of 523 tree stems per hectare, while CMM counted 516. Approximately 9.6% of trees identified with TLS were commission errors, with 6.5% of CMM trees being omitted using TLS. Basal area per hectare was slightly higher in TLS (38.9 m3) than in CMM (38.2 m3). However, CMM recorded a greater standing volume (492.7 m3) than TLS (440.5 m3). The discrepancy in stand volume between methods was primarily due to TLS underestimating tree height, especially for taller trees. DBH bias was minor at 1 cm between methods. Repeated TLS inventories successfully matched an average of 424 tree positions per hectare. While TLS adequately characterizes complex plenter forest structures, we propose enhancing this methodology with personal laser scanning to optimize crown coverage and efficiency and direct volume measurements for increased accuracy of wood volume estimations. Additionally, utilizing 3D point cloud data-derived metrics, such as structural complexity indices, can further enhance plenter forest management.

评估复杂林分结构的地面激光扫描与人工方法:木栓林对比分析
摘要 在连续覆盖林中,蓄积造林被视为一种精心设计的系统,用于优化优质木材的可持续生产,以保持恒定但不均匀的冠层。由于其复杂性,必须具备高水平的造林专业知识,并对林分结构变量进行详细评估。地面激光扫描(TLS)可为复杂森林结构中的长期树木测绘、体积计算和林分变量评估提供可靠的技术。我们使用自动 TLS 和传统人工方法(CMM)对德国黑森林中造林制度截然不同的两个地块进行了调查。与 CMM 相比,不同 TLS 调查在自动树木检测和林分变量方面的差异更大。TLS 平均每公顷检测到 523 棵树,而 CMM 则检测到 516 棵。在使用 TLS 发现的树木中,约有 9.6% 的树木出现了误差,而使用 TLS 则遗漏了 6.5% 的 CMM 树木。TLS 的每公顷基底面积(38.9 立方米)略高于 CMM(38.2 立方米)。然而,CMM 记录的立木体积(492.7 立方米)大于 TLS(440.5 立方米)。两种方法在林分体积上的差异主要是由于 TLS 低估了树高,尤其是较高的树木。不同方法的 DBH 偏差很小,仅为 1 厘米。重复的 TLS 普查成功地匹配了平均每公顷 424 棵树的位置。虽然 TLS 能够充分描述复杂的板层森林结构,但我们建议使用个人激光扫描来增强这种方法,以优化树冠覆盖率和效率,并直接测量木材体积,从而提高木材体积估算的准确性。此外,利用三维点云数据衍生出的指标(如结构复杂性指数)可进一步加强板条林管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
77
审稿时长
6-16 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Forest Research focuses on publishing innovative results of empirical or model-oriented studies which contribute to the development of broad principles underlying forest ecosystems, their functions and services. Papers which exclusively report methods, models, techniques or case studies are beyond the scope of the journal, while papers on studies at the molecular or cellular level will be considered where they address the relevance of their results to the understanding of ecosystem structure and function. Papers relating to forest operations and forest engineering will be considered if they are tailored within a forest ecosystem context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信