A model for quantifying the effectiveness of leaky barriers as a flood mitigation intervention in an agricultural landscape

IF 1.7 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Martha L. Villamizar, Chris Stoate, Jeremy Biggs, John Szczur, Penny Williams, Colin D. Brown
{"title":"A model for quantifying the effectiveness of leaky barriers as a flood mitigation intervention in an agricultural landscape","authors":"Martha L. Villamizar, Chris Stoate, Jeremy Biggs, John Szczur, Penny Williams, Colin D. Brown","doi":"10.1002/rra.4241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Leaky barriers have become an important mitigation option within natural flood management to reduce downstream flood risk. Modelling is a key tool to aid in the design of leaky barrier installations for flood mitigation, but there is limited evidence about the accuracy of model representations of the system. Here, the hydrological model SWAT was combined with a water routing model that simulates multiple leaky barriers as permeable sluice gates. Storage behind individual barriers was quantified using barrier dimensions and LIDAR topography. The model was applied to a series of 27 leaky barriers installed as part of a long-term manipulation experiment into a 11-km<sup>2</sup> intensive lowland agricultural catchment in Leicestershire, England. Evaluation of the model against flow data collected before and after leaky barrier installation and time-lapse photography taken across storm events at individual barriers demonstrated robust model performance (Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency and <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> across 19 validation events were 0.84 ± 0.14 and 0.91 ± 0.08, respectively). Empirical and modelling data were then combined to demonstrate that the 17,700 m<sup>3</sup> of water storage provided by the 27 leaky barriers reduced peak flows at the catchment outlet by 22 ± 6% and delayed the peak in flow by up to 5 h for 11 storm events recorded after all barriers had been installed. The volume of storage utilised prior to the flood event was a key factor influencing the reduction in peak flow, and a sensitivity analysis indicated that barriers should be permeable to accelerate drain-down of the barrier and help to mitigate risk from multiple storm events occurring in sequence.","PeriodicalId":21513,"journal":{"name":"River Research and Applications","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"River Research and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.4241","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Leaky barriers have become an important mitigation option within natural flood management to reduce downstream flood risk. Modelling is a key tool to aid in the design of leaky barrier installations for flood mitigation, but there is limited evidence about the accuracy of model representations of the system. Here, the hydrological model SWAT was combined with a water routing model that simulates multiple leaky barriers as permeable sluice gates. Storage behind individual barriers was quantified using barrier dimensions and LIDAR topography. The model was applied to a series of 27 leaky barriers installed as part of a long-term manipulation experiment into a 11-km2 intensive lowland agricultural catchment in Leicestershire, England. Evaluation of the model against flow data collected before and after leaky barrier installation and time-lapse photography taken across storm events at individual barriers demonstrated robust model performance (Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency and R2 across 19 validation events were 0.84 ± 0.14 and 0.91 ± 0.08, respectively). Empirical and modelling data were then combined to demonstrate that the 17,700 m3 of water storage provided by the 27 leaky barriers reduced peak flows at the catchment outlet by 22 ± 6% and delayed the peak in flow by up to 5 h for 11 storm events recorded after all barriers had been installed. The volume of storage utilised prior to the flood event was a key factor influencing the reduction in peak flow, and a sensitivity analysis indicated that barriers should be permeable to accelerate drain-down of the barrier and help to mitigate risk from multiple storm events occurring in sequence.
量化农业景观中作为防洪措施的渗漏屏障有效性的模型
渗漏屏障已成为自然洪水管理中减少下游洪水风险的重要缓解方案。建模是帮助设计防渗沥水屏障以减轻洪水风险的重要工具,但有关该系统建模准确性的证据却很有限。在这里,水文模型 SWAT 与水路模型相结合,将多个渗漏屏障模拟为可渗透的水闸。利用屏障尺寸和激光雷达地形对各个屏障后的蓄水量进行了量化。该模型应用于在英格兰莱斯特郡 11 平方公里的密集低地农业集水区安装的一系列 27 个渗漏栅栏,作为长期操纵实验的一部分。根据渗漏屏障安装前后收集的流量数据以及在单个屏障处拍摄的暴雨事件延时摄影,对模型进行了评估,结果表明模型性能良好(19 个验证事件的纳什-萨特克利夫效率和 R2 分别为 0.84 ± 0.14 和 0.91 ± 0.08)。然后将经验数据和模型数据相结合,证明在安装所有防渗栅后记录的 11 次暴雨事件中,27 个防渗栅提供的 17,700 立方米蓄水量将汇水区出口的峰值流量降低了 22 ± 6%,并将峰值流量延迟了长达 5 小时。洪水事件发生前的蓄水量是影响峰值流量减少的关键因素,敏感性分析表明,防渗栅应具有透水性,以加快防渗栅的排水速度,并有助于减轻连续发生多次暴雨事件所带来的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
River Research and Applications
River Research and Applications 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
158
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: River Research and Applications , previously published as Regulated Rivers: Research and Management (1987-2001), is an international journal dedicated to the promotion of basic and applied scientific research on rivers. The journal publishes original scientific and technical papers on biological, ecological, geomorphological, hydrological, engineering and geographical aspects related to rivers in both the developed and developing world. Papers showing how basic studies and new science can be of use in applied problems associated with river management, regulation and restoration are encouraged as is interdisciplinary research concerned directly or indirectly with river management problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信