Chhanda CS, Rashid MSU, Mondal SK, Begum M, Shimu AA, Boby N, Ali MS
{"title":"Effectiveness of Consecutive Versus Premixed Administration of Fentanyl and Bupivacaine in Subarachnoid Block for Total Abdominal Hysterectomy","authors":"Chhanda CS, Rashid MSU, Mondal SK, Begum M, Shimu AA, Boby N, Ali MS","doi":"10.47648/jswmc2024v14-01-86","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Subarachnoid block (SAB) was a common regional anaesthetic technique, with opioids as adjuvants to enhance effectiveness and reduce hypotension.\n\nObjective: Comparison of the effectiveness of consecutive versus premixed administration of fentanyl and hyperbaric bupivacaine in subarachnoid block for TAH.\n\nMethods: This Quasi experimental study was carried out in 70 patients divided into two groups of 35 each: Group A received 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine 15mg (3ml) premixed with fentanyl 25µg (0.5ml) in a same syringe and Group Breceived fentanyl 25µg (0.5ml) in one syringe followed by 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine 15mg (3ml) in a separate syringe. The study compared the onset of sensory and motor block, reaching maximum sensory level, and complete motor block, as well as the time required for analgesia and ephedrine. Statistical significance was determined at a P-value < 0.05.\n\nResults: The study found that group B had significantly less time for onset of sensory block(3.45±0.41 vs 2.65±0.32min), motor block (4.51±0.53 vs 3.31±0.46min), and total ephedrine consumption (15.29±6.52 vs 11.86±5.95mg)compared to group A. Additionally, the time of sensory (236.8±21.7 vs 269.6±24.3 min) and motor block regression (203.8±18.6 vs 237.5±20.8min), and first required analgesia (248.2±23.3 vs 283.8±23.4 min)was longer in group B.\n\nConclusion: Consecutive administration of fentanyl and hyperbaric bupivacaine is more effective than premixed administration in subarachnoid block for total abdominal hysterectomy.","PeriodicalId":407803,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Sylhet Women’s Medical College","volume":"19 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Sylhet Women’s Medical College","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47648/jswmc2024v14-01-86","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Subarachnoid block (SAB) was a common regional anaesthetic technique, with opioids as adjuvants to enhance effectiveness and reduce hypotension.
Objective: Comparison of the effectiveness of consecutive versus premixed administration of fentanyl and hyperbaric bupivacaine in subarachnoid block for TAH.
Methods: This Quasi experimental study was carried out in 70 patients divided into two groups of 35 each: Group A received 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine 15mg (3ml) premixed with fentanyl 25µg (0.5ml) in a same syringe and Group Breceived fentanyl 25µg (0.5ml) in one syringe followed by 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine 15mg (3ml) in a separate syringe. The study compared the onset of sensory and motor block, reaching maximum sensory level, and complete motor block, as well as the time required for analgesia and ephedrine. Statistical significance was determined at a P-value < 0.05.
Results: The study found that group B had significantly less time for onset of sensory block(3.45±0.41 vs 2.65±0.32min), motor block (4.51±0.53 vs 3.31±0.46min), and total ephedrine consumption (15.29±6.52 vs 11.86±5.95mg)compared to group A. Additionally, the time of sensory (236.8±21.7 vs 269.6±24.3 min) and motor block regression (203.8±18.6 vs 237.5±20.8min), and first required analgesia (248.2±23.3 vs 283.8±23.4 min)was longer in group B.
Conclusion: Consecutive administration of fentanyl and hyperbaric bupivacaine is more effective than premixed administration in subarachnoid block for total abdominal hysterectomy.
背景:蛛网膜下腔阻滞(SAB)是一种常见的区域麻醉技术:蛛网膜下腔阻滞(SAB)是一种常见的区域麻醉技术,阿片类药物作为辅助药物可提高疗效并减少低血压:比较芬太尼和高压布比卡因在 TAH 蛛网膜下腔阻滞中连续给药与预混给药的效果:这项准实验研究将 70 名患者分为两组,每组 35 人:A组在同一注射器中注射0.5%高压布比卡因15毫克(3毫升)和芬太尼25微克(0.5毫升),B组在一个注射器中注射芬太尼25微克(0.5毫升),然后在另一个注射器中注射0.5%高压布比卡因15毫克(3毫升)。研究比较了感觉和运动阻滞的开始时间、达到最大感觉水平和完全运动阻滞的时间,以及镇痛和麻黄碱所需的时间。统计学意义以 P 值小于 0.05 为准:研究发现,与 A 组相比,B 组的感觉阻滞开始时间(3.45±0.41 vs 2.65±0.32min)、运动阻滞时间(4.51±0.53 vs 3.31±0.46min)和麻黄碱总用量(15.29±6.52 vs 11.86±5.95mg)均明显减少。此外,B 组的感觉阻滞时间(236.8±21.7 vs 269.6±24.3分钟)和运动阻滞消退时间(203.8±18.6 vs 237.5±20.8分钟)以及首次镇痛时间(248.2±23.3 vs 283.8±23.4分钟)更长:结论:在全腹子宫切除术中,连续使用芬太尼和高压布比卡因比预先混合使用蛛网膜下腔阻滞更有效。