Management of a Failed Hybrid Implant Full-arch Prosthesis- A Case Report

IF 0.8 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Eldo Koshy, L. Annamma, Hafsa Al Idrissi, Huda Abutayyem
{"title":"Management of a Failed Hybrid Implant Full-arch Prosthesis- A Case Report","authors":"Eldo Koshy, L. Annamma, Hafsa Al Idrissi, Huda Abutayyem","doi":"10.3329/bjms.v23i1.70761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Biological and technical hardware complications in implant-retained prostheses are well documented in the literature. The most frequently reported failures are on the immediate or delayed factors after implant placement. Even when the implant has successfully osseointegrated, there is a chance that the prosthesis can fail if the treatment planning and occlusal aspects are not well studied. Management of failed cases is rarely reported. In this case report, the authors present a failed implant prosthesis and how it was managed well with a more permanent solution. \nCase presentation: A 55-year-old, male retired bank manager, reported with the chief complaint of frequent fracture of the maxillary acrylic hybrid implant prosthesis that was delivered 6 months ago. He wanted a replacement for the fractured upper maxillary acrylic hybrid prosthesis. On clinical evaluation, the upper maxillary implant prosthesis was opposing the natural tooth, an anterior bridge, and two posterior implants in the lower right and left of the first and second molar region. The patient was happy with the lower restorations. \nConclusion: The design of the final restoration based on biological, mechanical, technological, and patient factors should be ideally planned during the initial treatment planning stage itself. In case a prosthesis fails the underlying cause should be analyzed and retreatment planning is to be done. \nBangladesh Journal of Medical Science Vol. 23 No. 01 January’24 Page : 266-271","PeriodicalId":8696,"journal":{"name":"Bangladesh Journal of Medical Science","volume":"63 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bangladesh Journal of Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/bjms.v23i1.70761","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Biological and technical hardware complications in implant-retained prostheses are well documented in the literature. The most frequently reported failures are on the immediate or delayed factors after implant placement. Even when the implant has successfully osseointegrated, there is a chance that the prosthesis can fail if the treatment planning and occlusal aspects are not well studied. Management of failed cases is rarely reported. In this case report, the authors present a failed implant prosthesis and how it was managed well with a more permanent solution. Case presentation: A 55-year-old, male retired bank manager, reported with the chief complaint of frequent fracture of the maxillary acrylic hybrid implant prosthesis that was delivered 6 months ago. He wanted a replacement for the fractured upper maxillary acrylic hybrid prosthesis. On clinical evaluation, the upper maxillary implant prosthesis was opposing the natural tooth, an anterior bridge, and two posterior implants in the lower right and left of the first and second molar region. The patient was happy with the lower restorations. Conclusion: The design of the final restoration based on biological, mechanical, technological, and patient factors should be ideally planned during the initial treatment planning stage itself. In case a prosthesis fails the underlying cause should be analyzed and retreatment planning is to be done. Bangladesh Journal of Medical Science Vol. 23 No. 01 January’24 Page : 266-271
混合种植体全拱假体失败的处理--病例报告
背景:文献中对种植义齿的生物和技术硬件并发症有大量记载。报道最多的失败是种植体植入后的即刻或延迟因素。即使种植体已经成功骨结合,如果治疗计划和咬合方面没有得到很好的研究,修复体也有可能失败。失败病例的处理方法很少见报道。在本病例报告中,作者介绍了一个失败的种植修复体,以及如何通过一种更永久的解决方案对其进行妥善处理。病例介绍:患者是一名 55 岁的男性退休银行经理,主诉是 6 个月前交付的上颌丙烯酸混合种植义齿经常发生骨折。他希望更换已经断裂的上颌丙烯酸混合种植义齿。经临床评估,上颌种植修复体与天然牙、前牙桥以及第一和第二磨牙区右下方和左下方的两颗后牙种植体对立。患者对下部修复体很满意。结论:在最初的治疗规划阶段,就应该根据生物学、机械学、技术和患者因素对最终修复体进行理想的设计。如果修复失败,应分析其根本原因并制定再治疗计划。孟加拉医学杂志》第 23 卷第 01 期 24 年 1 月 第 266-271 页
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bangladesh Journal of Medical Science
Bangladesh Journal of Medical Science MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
55.60%
发文量
139
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信