The perspective of school leaders on the implementation of evidence-based practices: A mixed methods study

Stephanie A. Moore, A. Sridhar, Isabella Taormina, Manasi Rajadhyaksha, Gazi Azad
{"title":"The perspective of school leaders on the implementation of evidence-based practices: A mixed methods study","authors":"Stephanie A. Moore, A. Sridhar, Isabella Taormina, Manasi Rajadhyaksha, Gazi Azad","doi":"10.1177/26334895231220279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"School leaders play an integral role in the use of implementation strategies, which in turn support special education teachers in the implementation of evidence-based practices (EBPs). In this convergent mixed methods study, we explored school leaders’ perceptions of the facilitators and barriers to EBP implementation, particularly for students receiving special education, as well as the importance and feasibility of 15 implementation strategies. School leaders ( N  =  22, principals, assistant principals, school psychologists, etc.) participated in a semistructured interview that included three parts—qualitative questions, quantitative ratings of strategies’ importance and feasibility, and discussion of the top three implementation strategies. Data strands were analyzed independently and then integrated to generate meta-inferences. The qualitative data identified facilitators such as access to resources about the intervention (e.g., professional development) and collaboration and teamwork, while barriers centered on lack of school supports, culture/climate, and organizational factors (e.g., lack of communication). The quantitative data indicated that the implementation strategy provide ongoing consultation/coaching was rated as important and feasible. Monitor the progress of the implementation effort was rated as important but less feasible, while conduct educational meetings and change the environment were rated as feasible, but less important. Build partnerships to support implementation was rated as less important and feasible. There was convergence and divergence in mixed methods findings. This study underscores the critical need to increase school leaders’ knowledge and skills related to implementation science to better leverage implementation strategies that address the confluence of relevant implementation determinants.","PeriodicalId":73354,"journal":{"name":"Implementation research and practice","volume":"88 17","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Implementation research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26334895231220279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

School leaders play an integral role in the use of implementation strategies, which in turn support special education teachers in the implementation of evidence-based practices (EBPs). In this convergent mixed methods study, we explored school leaders’ perceptions of the facilitators and barriers to EBP implementation, particularly for students receiving special education, as well as the importance and feasibility of 15 implementation strategies. School leaders ( N  =  22, principals, assistant principals, school psychologists, etc.) participated in a semistructured interview that included three parts—qualitative questions, quantitative ratings of strategies’ importance and feasibility, and discussion of the top three implementation strategies. Data strands were analyzed independently and then integrated to generate meta-inferences. The qualitative data identified facilitators such as access to resources about the intervention (e.g., professional development) and collaboration and teamwork, while barriers centered on lack of school supports, culture/climate, and organizational factors (e.g., lack of communication). The quantitative data indicated that the implementation strategy provide ongoing consultation/coaching was rated as important and feasible. Monitor the progress of the implementation effort was rated as important but less feasible, while conduct educational meetings and change the environment were rated as feasible, but less important. Build partnerships to support implementation was rated as less important and feasible. There was convergence and divergence in mixed methods findings. This study underscores the critical need to increase school leaders’ knowledge and skills related to implementation science to better leverage implementation strategies that address the confluence of relevant implementation determinants.
学校领导对实施循证实践的看法:混合方法研究
学校领导在实施策略的使用中发挥着不可或缺的作用,而实施策略又反过来支持特殊教育教师实施循证实践(EBPs)。在这项融合混合方法研究中,我们探讨了学校领导对实施 EBP(尤其是针对接受特殊教育的学生)的促进因素和障碍的看法,以及 15 种实施策略的重要性和可行性。学校领导(22 人,包括校长、校长助理、学校心理学家等)参加了一次半结构式访谈,访谈包括三个部分--定性问题、对策略重要性和可行性的定量评分以及对前三种实施策略的讨论。对各部分数据进行独立分析,然后进行整合,以产生元推论。定性数据确定了一些促进因素,如获取有关干预措施的资源(如专业发展)以及协作和团队精神,而障碍则集中在缺乏学校支持、文化/气候和组织因素(如缺乏沟通)等方面。定量数据表明,提供持续咨询/辅导的实施策略被认为是重要和可行的。监测实施工作的进展被评为重要但不太可行,而召开教育会议和改变环境被评为可行但不太重要。建立伙伴关系以支持实施工作被评为不太重要和不太可行。混合方法的研究结果既有相同之处,也有不同之处。这项研究强调了提高学校领导者与实施科学相关的知识和技能的迫切需要,以便更好地利用实施策略,解决相关实施决定因素的融合问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信