Traditional ecological knowledge of mangrove wood use on the Brazilian Amazon coast

IF 1.6 Q3 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Madson Lucas Galvão, Tatiane Medeiros Rodrigues, Iêdo Souza Santos, Marcus Emanuel Barroncas Fernandes
{"title":"Traditional ecological knowledge of mangrove wood use on the Brazilian Amazon coast","authors":"Madson Lucas Galvão, Tatiane Medeiros Rodrigues, Iêdo Souza Santos, Marcus Emanuel Barroncas Fernandes","doi":"10.15451/ec2024-01-13.03-1-19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) has been widely used and valued as a reliable source of information in the development of research on the various uses of the forest. Here, the socio-environmental factors that affect the traditional knowledge of extractivists about the uses of mangrove wood in an estuarine-coastal community in the Brazilian Amazon region were analyzed. The grouping of words evoked in semi-structured interviews with 108 local informants highlighted the lexicons that best express the use of mangrove wood. Factorial correspondence analysis was used to assess the intersection between words and age groups, helping to indicate respondents' TEK of these uses. Most respondents say that wood is used for domestic (family) purposes, mainly charcoal and weir, and that these purposes and applications were taught by the older generation of the community. The traditional uses of the species Rhizophora mangle, Avicennia germinans, and Laguncularia racemosa have been validated by the scientific literature through their technological properties. From this validation, a relevant contribution is to include the participation of users in intervention processes by using their TEK, making the planning process of preventive conservation strategies and management proposals more efficient, promoting the reduction of a future advance deforestation in this region. Likewise, such information is relevant to guide the social actors involved in the implementation of public policies, favouring the creation of new alternatives and solutions for better management and use of wood resources in mangrove areas.","PeriodicalId":44826,"journal":{"name":"Ethnobiology and Conservation","volume":"134 16","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethnobiology and Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15451/ec2024-01-13.03-1-19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) has been widely used and valued as a reliable source of information in the development of research on the various uses of the forest. Here, the socio-environmental factors that affect the traditional knowledge of extractivists about the uses of mangrove wood in an estuarine-coastal community in the Brazilian Amazon region were analyzed. The grouping of words evoked in semi-structured interviews with 108 local informants highlighted the lexicons that best express the use of mangrove wood. Factorial correspondence analysis was used to assess the intersection between words and age groups, helping to indicate respondents' TEK of these uses. Most respondents say that wood is used for domestic (family) purposes, mainly charcoal and weir, and that these purposes and applications were taught by the older generation of the community. The traditional uses of the species Rhizophora mangle, Avicennia germinans, and Laguncularia racemosa have been validated by the scientific literature through their technological properties. From this validation, a relevant contribution is to include the participation of users in intervention processes by using their TEK, making the planning process of preventive conservation strategies and management proposals more efficient, promoting the reduction of a future advance deforestation in this region. Likewise, such information is relevant to guide the social actors involved in the implementation of public policies, favouring the creation of new alternatives and solutions for better management and use of wood resources in mangrove areas.
巴西亚马逊沿岸红树林木材使用的传统生态知识
传统生态知识(TEK)作为一种可靠的信息来源,在森林各种用途的研究发展中得到了广泛应用和重视。本文分析了影响巴西亚马逊地区一个河口海岸社区采掘者关于红树林木材用途的传统知识的社会环境因素。对 108 名当地信息提供者进行的半结构式访谈中唤起的词汇分组突出了最能表达红树林木材用途的词汇。采用因子对应分析法评估了词语与年龄组之间的交集,有助于说明受访者对这些用途的传统知识。大多数受访者表示,木材用于家庭(家庭)用途,主要是木炭和围堰,而这些用途和应用是由社区的老一辈人传授的。Rhizophora mangle、Avicennia germinans 和 Laguncularia racemosa 树种的传统用途已通过其技术特性得到科学文献的验证。通过这一验证,一个相关的贡献是让使用者利用其传统知识参与干预过程,使预防性保护战略和管理建议的规划过程更加有效,促进减少该地区未来的过度砍伐。同样,这些信息对于指导参与实施公共政策的社会行动者也很重要,有利于创造新的替代方案和解决方案,更好地管理和使用红树林地区的木材资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ethnobiology and Conservation
Ethnobiology and Conservation BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
21.40%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: Ethnobiology and Conservation (EC) is an open access and peer-reviewed online journal that publishes original contributions in all fields of ethnobiology and conservation of nature. The scope of EC includes traditional ecological knowledge, human ecology, ethnoecology, ethnopharmacology, ecological anthropology, and history and philosophy of science. Contributions in the area of conservation of nature can involve studies that are normally in the field of traditional ecological studies, as well as in animal and plant biology, ethology, biogeography, management of fauna and flora, and ethical and legal aspects about the conservation of biodiversity. However, all papers should focus explicitly on their contribution to the conservation of nature. Merely descriptive papers without a theoretical discussion contextualized from the findings, although possibly being accepted, will not be given priority for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信