Safety and benefit of modified mesohepatectomy in the treatment of bilobar involvement congenital biliary dilatation

Shuo Jin, Nan Jiang, Si‐Qiao Shan, Si-Yuan Wang, Cheng-Yao Zhou, Shi‐Zhong Yang, Xue‐Li Yuan, Can-Hong Xiang, Jian‐Ping Zeng, Jia‐Hong Dong
{"title":"Safety and benefit of modified mesohepatectomy in the treatment of bilobar involvement congenital biliary dilatation","authors":"Shuo Jin, Nan Jiang, Si‐Qiao Shan, Si-Yuan Wang, Cheng-Yao Zhou, Shi‐Zhong Yang, Xue‐Li Yuan, Can-Hong Xiang, Jian‐Ping Zeng, Jia‐Hong Dong","doi":"10.1002/wjs.12036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The diseased bile duct in bilobar congenital biliary dilatation is extensive and often requires major hepatectomy or liver transplantation associated with a higher risk. We aimed to evaluate the safety and benefit of modified mesohepatectomy, in comparison with trisectionectomy, to treat bilobar congenital biliary dilatation.This study included 28 patients with type IV and V bilobar congenital biliary dilatation. An innovative mesohepatectomy comprising the hepatectomy technique beyond the P/U point and bile duct shaping was applied to 14 patients to address the extensively diseased bile duct and difficulty in hepaticojejunostomy. Another 14 patients received trisectionectomy. The perioperative and long‐term outcomes of these patients were compared.The ratio of residual liver volume to standard liver volume in the mesohepatectomy group was higher (78.68% vs. 40.90%, p = 0.005), while the resection rate of the liver parenchyma was lower (28.25% vs. 63.97%, p = 0.000), than that in trisectionectomy group. The mesohepatectomy group had a lower severe complication (>Clavein III, 0% vs. 57.70%, p = 0.019) and incidence of posthepatectomy liver failure (7.14% vs. 42.86%, p = 0.038). No significant difference was observed in blood loss and bile leakage (p > 0.05). All the patients in the mesohepatectomy group achieved optimal results in the long‐term follow‐up.mesohepatectomy provides an efficient treatment option for bilobar congenital biliary dilatation and can achieve radical resection, retain more liver parenchyma, and reduce the difficulty of hepaticojejunostomy, especially for patients that are not eligible for major hepatectomy and liver transplantation.","PeriodicalId":507313,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgery","volume":"84 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.12036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The diseased bile duct in bilobar congenital biliary dilatation is extensive and often requires major hepatectomy or liver transplantation associated with a higher risk. We aimed to evaluate the safety and benefit of modified mesohepatectomy, in comparison with trisectionectomy, to treat bilobar congenital biliary dilatation.This study included 28 patients with type IV and V bilobar congenital biliary dilatation. An innovative mesohepatectomy comprising the hepatectomy technique beyond the P/U point and bile duct shaping was applied to 14 patients to address the extensively diseased bile duct and difficulty in hepaticojejunostomy. Another 14 patients received trisectionectomy. The perioperative and long‐term outcomes of these patients were compared.The ratio of residual liver volume to standard liver volume in the mesohepatectomy group was higher (78.68% vs. 40.90%, p = 0.005), while the resection rate of the liver parenchyma was lower (28.25% vs. 63.97%, p = 0.000), than that in trisectionectomy group. The mesohepatectomy group had a lower severe complication (>Clavein III, 0% vs. 57.70%, p = 0.019) and incidence of posthepatectomy liver failure (7.14% vs. 42.86%, p = 0.038). No significant difference was observed in blood loss and bile leakage (p > 0.05). All the patients in the mesohepatectomy group achieved optimal results in the long‐term follow‐up.mesohepatectomy provides an efficient treatment option for bilobar congenital biliary dilatation and can achieve radical resection, retain more liver parenchyma, and reduce the difficulty of hepaticojejunostomy, especially for patients that are not eligible for major hepatectomy and liver transplantation.
改良中肝切除术治疗双叶受累先天性胆道扩张的安全性和益处
双叶型先天性胆道扩张症的病变胆管范围很广,通常需要进行肝切除术或肝移植,但风险较高。我们的目的是评估改良中肝切除术与三段切除术相比,治疗双叶先天性胆道扩张症的安全性和益处。该研究纳入了 28 例 IV 型和 V 型双叶先天性胆道扩张症患者,其中 14 例患者接受了创新的肝中叶切除术,包括 P/U 点以外的肝切除技术和胆管成形术,以解决胆管广泛病变和肝空肠吻合术困难的问题。另外 14 名患者接受了三段切除术。中段肝切除术组的残肝体积与标准肝体积之比(78.68% vs. 40.90%,P = 0.005)高于三段肝切除术组,而肝实质切除率则低于三段肝切除术组(28.25% vs. 63.97%,P = 0.000)。中肝切除术组的严重并发症(>Clavein III,0% vs. 57.70%,P = 0.019)和肝切除术后肝功能衰竭发生率(7.14% vs. 42.86%,P = 0.038)较低。在失血和胆汁渗漏方面没有观察到明显差异(P > 0.05)。中段肝切除术为双叶先天性胆道扩张提供了一种有效的治疗方案,可以实现根治性切除,保留更多的肝实质,减少肝空肠吻合术的难度,尤其适用于不符合大肝切除术和肝移植条件的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信