Field Evaluation of Biological and Conventional Insecticides for Managing Multiple Insect Pests in Cotton1

IF 0.7 4区 农林科学 Q4 ENTOMOLOGY
N. Little, Blake H Elkins, Maribel Portilla, K. C. Allen, Quentin D. Read, Ryan T. Paulk
{"title":"Field Evaluation of Biological and Conventional Insecticides for Managing Multiple Insect Pests in Cotton1","authors":"N. Little, Blake H Elkins, Maribel Portilla, K. C. Allen, Quentin D. Read, Ryan T. Paulk","doi":"10.18474/jes23-37","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Cotton, Gossypium hirsutum (L.), is an economically important crop in the United States that is plagued by a complex of insect pests. Two key pests of cotton in the midsouthern United States are the tarnished plant bug, Lygus lineolaris (Palisot de Beauvois) (Hemiptera: Miridae), and bollworm, Helicoverpa zea (Boddie) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). A suite of highly effective synthetic insecticides is typically used for control of these pests. However, it is unclear how the combined management of these two insect pests with biological insecticides impacts the economics of cotton production. To address this shortcoming, we conducted a field experiment in the Mississippi Delta over 2 yr to study the effects of synthetic and biological insecticides for control of the tarnished plant bug and bollworm on cotton yield. The results indicated the control of tarnished plant bug with synthetic insecticides had the most significant impact on cotton yield and net returns. The conventional tarnished plant bug treatment also significantly increased bollworm density and damage, but these increases did not significantly alter yield or net return in non–Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) or Bt cottons. The economic benefit of a conventional approach to tarnished plant bug control with synthetic insecticides was US$438.07/ha in non-Bt and $700.88/ha in Bt cotton relative to those treated with a biological insecticide. The biological insecticides used for this study were ineffective at significantly altering yield or net return. However, for insect management in cotton to be sustainable, alternatives must be found to complement conventional synthetic insecticides.","PeriodicalId":15765,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Entomological Science","volume":"62 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Entomological Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18474/jes23-37","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cotton, Gossypium hirsutum (L.), is an economically important crop in the United States that is plagued by a complex of insect pests. Two key pests of cotton in the midsouthern United States are the tarnished plant bug, Lygus lineolaris (Palisot de Beauvois) (Hemiptera: Miridae), and bollworm, Helicoverpa zea (Boddie) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). A suite of highly effective synthetic insecticides is typically used for control of these pests. However, it is unclear how the combined management of these two insect pests with biological insecticides impacts the economics of cotton production. To address this shortcoming, we conducted a field experiment in the Mississippi Delta over 2 yr to study the effects of synthetic and biological insecticides for control of the tarnished plant bug and bollworm on cotton yield. The results indicated the control of tarnished plant bug with synthetic insecticides had the most significant impact on cotton yield and net returns. The conventional tarnished plant bug treatment also significantly increased bollworm density and damage, but these increases did not significantly alter yield or net return in non–Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) or Bt cottons. The economic benefit of a conventional approach to tarnished plant bug control with synthetic insecticides was US$438.07/ha in non-Bt and $700.88/ha in Bt cotton relative to those treated with a biological insecticide. The biological insecticides used for this study were ineffective at significantly altering yield or net return. However, for insect management in cotton to be sustainable, alternatives must be found to complement conventional synthetic insecticides.
管理棉花多种害虫的生物杀虫剂和常规杀虫剂的田间评估1
棉花(Gossypium hirsutum (L.))是美国一种重要的经济作物,但却受到多种虫害的困扰。在美国中南部地区,棉花的两种主要害虫是褐飞虱 Lygus lineolaris (Palisot de Beauvois) (Hemiptera: Miridae) 和棉铃虫 Helicoverpa zea (Boddie) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)。防治这些害虫通常使用一套高效的合成杀虫剂。然而,使用生物杀虫剂综合治理这两种害虫对棉花生产的经济效益有何影响尚不清楚。为了弥补这一不足,我们在密西西比三角洲进行了为期两年的田间试验,研究合成杀虫剂和生物杀虫剂防治褐飞虱和棉铃虫对棉花产量的影响。结果表明,用合成杀虫剂防治褐飞虱对棉花产量和净收益的影响最大。传统的褪色植物蝽处理也会显著增加棉铃虫的密度和危害,但这些增加并不会显著改变非苏云金杆菌(Bt)棉花或 Bt 棉花的产量或净收益。与使用生物杀虫剂的棉花相比,使用合成杀虫剂控制褐飞虱的传统方法在非 Bt 棉花上的经济效益为 438.07 美元/公顷,在 Bt 棉花上的经济效益为 700.88 美元/公顷。本研究使用的生物杀虫剂在显著改变产量或净收益方面没有效果。然而,要实现棉花昆虫管理的可持续性,必须找到替代品来补充传统的合成杀虫剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
40
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Entomological Science (ISSN 0749-8004) is a peer-reviewed, scholarly journal that is published quarterly (January, April, July, and October) under the auspices of the Georgia Entomological Society in concert with Allen Press (Lawrence, Kansas). Manuscripts deemed acceptable for publication in the Journal report original research with insects and related arthropods or literature reviews offering foundations to innovative directions in entomological research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信