Insights into implementation planning for point-of-care testing to guide treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation: a mixed methods feasibility study

IF 1.6 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Julie Hart, Alexander Daniel Edwards, Andrew Stainthorpe
{"title":"Insights into implementation planning for point-of-care testing to guide treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation: a mixed methods feasibility study","authors":"Julie Hart, Alexander Daniel Edwards, Andrew Stainthorpe","doi":"10.3389/frhs.2023.1302653","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this mixed methods feasibility study was to gain insights into unmet clinical needs, stakeholder preferences and potential barriers and enablers to adoption for planning the implementation of point-of-care testing for earlier detection and guided treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) acute exacerbation in the NHS in England. Exacerbations of COPD cause considerable mortality and morbidity. Earlier identification of exacerbations and guided treatment would lead to reduced exacerbation duration, reduced hospitalizations and mortality, improve health-related quality of life, reduce unnecessary treatments (including inappropriate antibiotic prescribing) which could save the NHS over £400 per patient. During the early stages of product design, we took a multi-disciplinary approach to evidence generation, gaining insights from key stakeholders to test the product concept and inform evidence-based implementation planning. Primary data was collected from 11 health care and service professionals involved in the management of acute COPD exacerbations. Overall, participants agreed that by earlier differentiation of acute exacerbation from stable COPD, patients could be started on appropriate treatment. To implement point-of-care testing into clinical practice, evidence is required to demonstrate the accuracy of differentiating between exacerbation etiologies and to provide information on the beneficial impact to the system in terms of optimized management, reduced long-term side effects, admission avoidance, and cost-effectiveness. This research provides an evidence base for future implementation planning of point-of-care testing for earlier detection and guided treatment of COPD acute exacerbation. Moreover, the technology developers can decide whether to refine the product design and value proposition thereby de-risking product development.","PeriodicalId":73088,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in health services","volume":"12 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in health services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2023.1302653","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this mixed methods feasibility study was to gain insights into unmet clinical needs, stakeholder preferences and potential barriers and enablers to adoption for planning the implementation of point-of-care testing for earlier detection and guided treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) acute exacerbation in the NHS in England. Exacerbations of COPD cause considerable mortality and morbidity. Earlier identification of exacerbations and guided treatment would lead to reduced exacerbation duration, reduced hospitalizations and mortality, improve health-related quality of life, reduce unnecessary treatments (including inappropriate antibiotic prescribing) which could save the NHS over £400 per patient. During the early stages of product design, we took a multi-disciplinary approach to evidence generation, gaining insights from key stakeholders to test the product concept and inform evidence-based implementation planning. Primary data was collected from 11 health care and service professionals involved in the management of acute COPD exacerbations. Overall, participants agreed that by earlier differentiation of acute exacerbation from stable COPD, patients could be started on appropriate treatment. To implement point-of-care testing into clinical practice, evidence is required to demonstrate the accuracy of differentiating between exacerbation etiologies and to provide information on the beneficial impact to the system in terms of optimized management, reduced long-term side effects, admission avoidance, and cost-effectiveness. This research provides an evidence base for future implementation planning of point-of-care testing for earlier detection and guided treatment of COPD acute exacerbation. Moreover, the technology developers can decide whether to refine the product design and value proposition thereby de-risking product development.
对指导慢性阻塞性肺病恶化治疗的护理点检测实施规划的见解:一项混合方法可行性研究
这项混合方法可行性研究的目的是深入了解未满足的临床需求、利益相关者的偏好以及采用这种方法的潜在障碍和推动因素,以便规划在英格兰国家医疗服务系统中实施护理点检测,从而更早地发现慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)急性加重并指导治疗。慢性阻塞性肺疾病的恶化会导致相当高的死亡率和发病率。更早地识别病情恶化并进行指导性治疗将缩短病情恶化的持续时间,降低住院率和死亡率,改善与健康相关的生活质量,减少不必要的治疗(包括不适当的抗生素处方),从而为每位患者节省超过 400 英镑的 NHS 费用。在产品设计的早期阶段,我们采用了多学科方法来生成证据,从主要利益相关者那里获得见解,以检验产品概念并为基于证据的实施规划提供信息。我们从参与慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重管理的 11 名医疗保健和服务专业人员那里收集了原始数据。总体而言,参与者一致认为,通过尽早区分慢性阻塞性肺病急性加重与稳定期,可以让患者开始接受适当的治疗。要在临床实践中实施护理点检测,需要有证据证明区分加重病因的准确性,并提供信息说明在优化管理、减少长期副作用、避免入院和成本效益方面对系统产生的有益影响。这项研究为今后规划实施护理点检测提供了证据基础,以便更早地发现慢性阻塞性肺病急性加重并指导治疗。此外,技术开发人员还可以决定是否完善产品设计和价值主张,从而降低产品开发风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信