Comparative Evaluation of Molar Distalization Between Pendulum Appliance and Miniscrew Anchorage System: A Clinical Study

Sameer Sharma, Anil Singla, Vivek Mahajan, H. S. Jaj, Indu Dhiman
{"title":"Comparative Evaluation of Molar Distalization Between Pendulum Appliance and Miniscrew Anchorage System: A Clinical Study","authors":"Sameer Sharma, Anil Singla, Vivek Mahajan, H. S. Jaj, Indu Dhiman","doi":"10.1177/03015742231218824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Molar distalization is one of the treatment protocols in cases with mild to moderate arch discrepancy and class II molar relationship associated with a normal mandible. It is achieved by using pendulum appliance and temporary anchorage devices such as miniscrew anchorage system. To evaluate and compare the dentoalveolar and skeletal changes between pendulum appliance and miniscrew anchorage system. The patients were divided into 2 groups of 10 each: group I (using the pendulum appliance) and group II (using miniscrew anchorage system). Lateral cephalogram was taken for each subject and various skeletal such as SNA, SNB, ANB, and PTV-A dentoalveolar (U1-PTV, U6-PTV, U5-FH, and U6-FH) measurements were taken. The data obtained were statistically analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software. Intragroup analysis between pendulum and implant group was done using Wilcoxon Matched pairs test and the intergroup analysis between pendulum and implant group was done using Mann–Whitney test. The results showed that there was nonsignificant difference in both the groups ( p > .05) with the less tipping in group II (1.2) than group I (2.7) .The molar extrusion was more with the pendulum group (2.1 mm) than the miniscrew anchorage distalization group (1.3 mm). The molar distalization using the miniscrew anchorage system showed more bodily movement than the pendulum appliance which showed more tipping movement. Moreover, the pendulum appliance showed significant amount of anchor loss than the miniscrew anchorage system.","PeriodicalId":31847,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society","volume":"7 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03015742231218824","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Molar distalization is one of the treatment protocols in cases with mild to moderate arch discrepancy and class II molar relationship associated with a normal mandible. It is achieved by using pendulum appliance and temporary anchorage devices such as miniscrew anchorage system. To evaluate and compare the dentoalveolar and skeletal changes between pendulum appliance and miniscrew anchorage system. The patients were divided into 2 groups of 10 each: group I (using the pendulum appliance) and group II (using miniscrew anchorage system). Lateral cephalogram was taken for each subject and various skeletal such as SNA, SNB, ANB, and PTV-A dentoalveolar (U1-PTV, U6-PTV, U5-FH, and U6-FH) measurements were taken. The data obtained were statistically analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software. Intragroup analysis between pendulum and implant group was done using Wilcoxon Matched pairs test and the intergroup analysis between pendulum and implant group was done using Mann–Whitney test. The results showed that there was nonsignificant difference in both the groups ( p > .05) with the less tipping in group II (1.2) than group I (2.7) .The molar extrusion was more with the pendulum group (2.1 mm) than the miniscrew anchorage distalization group (1.3 mm). The molar distalization using the miniscrew anchorage system showed more bodily movement than the pendulum appliance which showed more tipping movement. Moreover, the pendulum appliance showed significant amount of anchor loss than the miniscrew anchorage system.
摆动矫治器与微型螺钉锚定系统的磨牙远端化比较评估:临床研究
磨牙远端矫治是针对轻中度牙弓不齐和下颌骨正常的二类磨牙关系病例的治疗方案之一。它是通过使用摆锤矫治器和临时固位装置(如微型螺丝固位系统)来实现的。评估并比较摆锤矫治器和迷你螺钉锚定系统在牙槽骨和骨骼方面的变化。将患者分为两组,每组 10 人:第一组(使用摆锤矫治器)和第二组(使用微型螺丝固定系统)。为每位受试者拍摄侧位头颅片,并测量各种骨骼,如 SNA、SNB、ANB 和 PTV-A 牙槽骨(U1-PTV、U6-PTV、U5-FH 和 U6-FH)。所得数据使用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)进行统计分析。摆锤组和种植体组之间的组内分析采用 Wilcoxon 配对检验,摆锤组和种植体组之间的组间分析采用 Mann-Whitney 检验。结果显示,两组间差异不显著(P > .05),第二组(1.2)比第一组(2.7)倾倒较少,摆锤组(2.1 毫米)比微型螺钉锚定远端化组(1.3 毫米)的臼齿挤出更多。与摆锤矫治器相比,使用微型螺钉锚定系统的臼齿远端化显示出更多的身体移动,而摆锤矫治器显示出更多的倾斜移动。此外,摆锤矫治器比微型螺钉锚定系统的锚损失量大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信