Geophysical and geotechnical investigations of the site of a collapsed two-storey building in Modomo, Ile-Ife, Southwestern Nigeria

O. Afolabi, B. M. Salami, T.M. Olapade, O. A. Alao
{"title":"Geophysical and geotechnical investigations of the site of a collapsed two-storey building in Modomo, Ile-Ife, Southwestern Nigeria","authors":"O. Afolabi, B. M. Salami, T.M. Olapade, O. A. Alao","doi":"10.4314/ijs.v25i3.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Geophysical and the geotechnical methods were used to study the site of a collapsed two-storey building in orderto determine the sequence and competence of the subsurface layers and determine the cause of the collapse of the building. The geophysical method employed the electrical resistivity method involving one dimensional (1D) Vertical Electrical Sounding (VES) and the two dimensional (2D) imaging techniques. Three VES stations were occupied using Schlumberger electrode configuration. 2D imaging data were acquired along four traverses using dipole-dipole electrode configuration. The geotechnical method involved Cone Penetration Test (CPT). CPT data was acquired at two points with the aid of 2.5 ton Dutch CPT machine. The results showed four subsurface layers based on the 1D VES results and 2D imaging results namely: topsoil, weathered layer, fractured basement rock and fresh basement rock. The topsoil resistivity varied from 116 Ωm to 191 Ωm and has thickness of about 1.5 m. It was classified as moderately competent. The second layer is weathered rock with resistivity varying between 92 Ωm and 327 Ωm and of about 8 m to 13 m thickness. This layer is also moderately competent. The third layer is fractured basement rock. It underlies the weathered rock and have resistivity varying from 391 Ωm to 405 Ωm. Its thickness varied from about 2 m to 20 m. This layer is competent. The fourth layer is the fresh basement rock having resistivity varying from 1365 Ωm to 12348 Ωm and is highly competent. The subsurface materials in the area are competent and can sustain the foundation of the building. Hence, the study concluded that the building collapse did not result from incompetent subsurface materials. Factors other than incompetent subsoil material that is human factors are believed to be responsible. This study has demonstrated the effectiveness of geophysical and geotechnical investigations in determining the competence of subsurface materials at engineering sites. ","PeriodicalId":13487,"journal":{"name":"Ife Journal of Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ife Journal of Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/ijs.v25i3.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Geophysical and the geotechnical methods were used to study the site of a collapsed two-storey building in orderto determine the sequence and competence of the subsurface layers and determine the cause of the collapse of the building. The geophysical method employed the electrical resistivity method involving one dimensional (1D) Vertical Electrical Sounding (VES) and the two dimensional (2D) imaging techniques. Three VES stations were occupied using Schlumberger electrode configuration. 2D imaging data were acquired along four traverses using dipole-dipole electrode configuration. The geotechnical method involved Cone Penetration Test (CPT). CPT data was acquired at two points with the aid of 2.5 ton Dutch CPT machine. The results showed four subsurface layers based on the 1D VES results and 2D imaging results namely: topsoil, weathered layer, fractured basement rock and fresh basement rock. The topsoil resistivity varied from 116 Ωm to 191 Ωm and has thickness of about 1.5 m. It was classified as moderately competent. The second layer is weathered rock with resistivity varying between 92 Ωm and 327 Ωm and of about 8 m to 13 m thickness. This layer is also moderately competent. The third layer is fractured basement rock. It underlies the weathered rock and have resistivity varying from 391 Ωm to 405 Ωm. Its thickness varied from about 2 m to 20 m. This layer is competent. The fourth layer is the fresh basement rock having resistivity varying from 1365 Ωm to 12348 Ωm and is highly competent. The subsurface materials in the area are competent and can sustain the foundation of the building. Hence, the study concluded that the building collapse did not result from incompetent subsurface materials. Factors other than incompetent subsoil material that is human factors are believed to be responsible. This study has demonstrated the effectiveness of geophysical and geotechnical investigations in determining the competence of subsurface materials at engineering sites. 
对尼日利亚西南部伊费岛莫多莫一栋倒塌的两层楼房进行的地球物理和岩土工程勘察
地球物理方法和岩土工程方法被用于研究一栋倒塌的两层楼房的现场,以确定地下层的顺序和能力,并确定楼房倒塌的原因。地球物理方法采用了电阻率法,包括一维(1D)垂直电探测(VES)和二维(2D)成像技术。使用 Schlumberger 公司的电极配置占用了三个 VES 站。使用偶极-偶极电极配置,沿四个横向采集了二维成像数据。岩土工程方法包括锥入度试验(CPT)。借助 2.5 吨荷兰 CPT 机器在两个点获取了 CPT 数据。根据 1D VES 结果和 2D 成像结果,结果显示了四个地下层,即表土层、风化层、断裂基底岩和新鲜基底岩。表层土壤电阻率在 116 Ωm 至 191 Ωm 之间变化,厚度约为 1.5 米。第二层为风化岩,电阻率介于 92 Ωm 至 327 Ωm 之间,厚度约为 8 米至 13 米。该层也属于中等赋存能力层。第三层为断裂基岩。其电阻率介于 391 Ωm 至 405 Ωm 之间。该层为含水层。第四層為新近形成的基底岩石,其電阻率由 1365 Ωm 至 12348 Ωm 不等,屬於高能層。该地区的地表下层材料是合格的,可以支撑建筑物的地基。因此,研究得出的结论是,建筑物倒塌并不是由于地下材料不合格造成的。除了地下材料不合格之外,人为因素也被认为是原因之一。这项研究证明了地球物理和岩土工程勘察在确定工程场地地下材料是否合格方面的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信