Determination of near-surface turbulent fluxes at a tropical location: an evaluation of flux-profile technique

O. A. Babatunde, A. P. Olufemi, L. Sunmonu, O. E. Abiye, O. R. Omokungbe, A. B. Toyeje, O. E. Obisesan
{"title":"Determination of near-surface turbulent fluxes at a tropical location: an evaluation of flux-profile technique","authors":"O. A. Babatunde, A. P. Olufemi, L. Sunmonu, O. E. Abiye, O. R. Omokungbe, A. B. Toyeje, O. E. Obisesan","doi":"10.4314/ijs.v25i3.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An experimental site at Obafemi Awolowo University's Teaching and Research Farm, in Ile-Ife, Nigeria, was used to conduct multilevel measurements of meteorological parameters, and turbulent fluxes of sensible and latent heat in the atmospheric surface layer (ASL) between June 1 and July 31, 2016. The framework provided by Monin-Obukhov Similarity Theory (MOST) for estimating the turbulent fluxes of sensible and latent heat through existing empirical flux-profile relationships was employed. The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of the flux-profile technique based on direct measurements of turbulent fluxes obtained from an eddy covariance (EC) system set up at the same location. The results showed that the diurnal patterns of both sensible and latent heat fluxes estimated from flux-profile technique compared relatively well with the direct measurements of the EC system. Nighttime estimations under stably stratified conditions of the atmosphere strongly correlated (R = 0.98) with the directly measured values. However, during the daytime convective conditions, there were some consistent discrepancies in the performance of the flux-profile technique with errors in some of the estimated fluxes well within the uncertainty range of the EC measurements. For sensible heat flux estimates; the coefficient of determination, R2 (0.71), the mean biased error, MBE (15.1 W/m2) and the percentage error determined for the period averaged values of the daytime estimates indicated that the sensible heat flux was only overestimated by up to 20%. On the other hand, a negative MBE 2 2 (-28.2 W/m2), weak coefficient of determination, R2(0.58)and negative percentage error obtained for the period averaged values of the latent heat flux indicated there is an underestimation of up to 45%. It can be concluded the flux-profile relationships can be employed within certain limits of confidence interval at tropical locations especially for the estimation of sensible heat flux.","PeriodicalId":13487,"journal":{"name":"Ife Journal of Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ife Journal of Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/ijs.v25i3.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An experimental site at Obafemi Awolowo University's Teaching and Research Farm, in Ile-Ife, Nigeria, was used to conduct multilevel measurements of meteorological parameters, and turbulent fluxes of sensible and latent heat in the atmospheric surface layer (ASL) between June 1 and July 31, 2016. The framework provided by Monin-Obukhov Similarity Theory (MOST) for estimating the turbulent fluxes of sensible and latent heat through existing empirical flux-profile relationships was employed. The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of the flux-profile technique based on direct measurements of turbulent fluxes obtained from an eddy covariance (EC) system set up at the same location. The results showed that the diurnal patterns of both sensible and latent heat fluxes estimated from flux-profile technique compared relatively well with the direct measurements of the EC system. Nighttime estimations under stably stratified conditions of the atmosphere strongly correlated (R = 0.98) with the directly measured values. However, during the daytime convective conditions, there were some consistent discrepancies in the performance of the flux-profile technique with errors in some of the estimated fluxes well within the uncertainty range of the EC measurements. For sensible heat flux estimates; the coefficient of determination, R2 (0.71), the mean biased error, MBE (15.1 W/m2) and the percentage error determined for the period averaged values of the daytime estimates indicated that the sensible heat flux was only overestimated by up to 20%. On the other hand, a negative MBE 2 2 (-28.2 W/m2), weak coefficient of determination, R2(0.58)and negative percentage error obtained for the period averaged values of the latent heat flux indicated there is an underestimation of up to 45%. It can be concluded the flux-profile relationships can be employed within certain limits of confidence interval at tropical locations especially for the estimation of sensible heat flux.
热带地区近地表湍流通量的测定:通量剖面技术评估
在2016年6月1日至7月31日期间,利用尼日利亚伊费岛奥巴费米-阿沃洛沃大学教学和研究农场的一个实验场地,对气象参数以及大气表层(ASL)的显热和潜热湍流通量进行了多层次测量。研究采用了莫宁-奥布霍夫相似理论(MOST)提供的框架,通过现有的经验通量-轮廓关系来估算湍动的显热和潜热通量。这项研究的目的是根据在同一地点建立的涡度协方差(EC)系统对湍流通量的直接测量结果,评估通量轮廓技术的性能。结果表明,通量曲线技术估算出的显热通量和潜热通量的昼夜变化规律与涡度协方差系统的直接测量结果比较接近。在大气稳定分层条件下的夜间估算值与直接测量值密切相关(R = 0.98)。然而,在白天的对流条件下,通量剖面技术的性能始终存在一些差异,一些估计通量的误差远在导电率测量值的不确定性范围之内。在显热通量估算方面,R2(0.71)决定系数、平均偏置误差 MBE(15.1 W/m2)和白天估算值的周期平均值所确定的误差百分比表明,显热通量最多被高估了 20%。另一方面,潜热通量的负 MBE 2 2(-28.2 W/m2)、较弱的判定系数 R2(0.58)和周期平均值的负百分比误差表明,对潜热通量的低估高达 45%。由此可以得出结论,通量-剖面关系可以在一定的置信区间范围内用于热带地区,特别是用于估算显热通量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信