Unraveling Mentors’ Positive and Negative Reactions to Protégés’ Taking Charge

Xin Liu, Rellie Derfler-Rozin, Jih‐Yu Mao, John M. Schaubroeck, Qiwei Zhou
{"title":"Unraveling Mentors’ Positive and Negative Reactions to Protégés’ Taking Charge","authors":"Xin Liu, Rellie Derfler-Rozin, Jih‐Yu Mao, John M. Schaubroeck, Qiwei Zhou","doi":"10.1177/01492063231220892","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the mentoring relationship, protégé proactivity is a key facilitator of mentoring support. However, we consider how protégé proactivity at work may lower mentors’ inclination to share knowledge. Drawing on and extending social perception theory and envy subtypes theory, we build a contingent dual-path model to theorize that a proactive protégé who takes charge at work may elicit mentor knowledge sharing or hiding through mentor benign or malicious envy, depending on the protégé's benevolence. Specifically, mentors are more likely to feel benign envy toward taking-charge and benevolent protégés, enhancing their knowledge sharing. Taking-charge protégés seen as less benevolent may encourage malicious envy in the mentors, leading them to hide knowledge. Findings from a multi-source, two-wave survey of the data of 187 mentor–protégé dyads in China (Study 1) and a pre-registered scenario-based experiment of 404 participants in the United States (Study 2) support our predictions. This research advances our knowledge of mentoring, envy, and proactivity, and provides practical implications to enhance the effectiveness of mentorship programs.","PeriodicalId":515747,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Management","volume":"32 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063231220892","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the mentoring relationship, protégé proactivity is a key facilitator of mentoring support. However, we consider how protégé proactivity at work may lower mentors’ inclination to share knowledge. Drawing on and extending social perception theory and envy subtypes theory, we build a contingent dual-path model to theorize that a proactive protégé who takes charge at work may elicit mentor knowledge sharing or hiding through mentor benign or malicious envy, depending on the protégé's benevolence. Specifically, mentors are more likely to feel benign envy toward taking-charge and benevolent protégés, enhancing their knowledge sharing. Taking-charge protégés seen as less benevolent may encourage malicious envy in the mentors, leading them to hide knowledge. Findings from a multi-source, two-wave survey of the data of 187 mentor–protégé dyads in China (Study 1) and a pre-registered scenario-based experiment of 404 participants in the United States (Study 2) support our predictions. This research advances our knowledge of mentoring, envy, and proactivity, and provides practical implications to enhance the effectiveness of mentorship programs.
解读导师对受训者主动承担责任的积极和消极反应
在指导关系中,被指导者的主动性是指导支持的关键促进因素。然而,我们考虑的是,被指导者在工作中的主动性会如何降低指导者分享知识的意愿。我们借鉴并扩展了社会认知理论和妒忌亚型理论,建立了一个或然双路径模型,认为在工作中主动负责的被指导者可能会通过指导者良性或恶意的妒忌来引起指导者的知识共享或隐藏,这取决于被指导者的仁慈程度。具体来说,导师更有可能对负责任和仁慈的受训者产生良性羡慕,从而促进他们的知识共享。而被视为不那么仁慈的 "负责任 "的被指导者则可能会激发指导者的恶意嫉妒,从而导致他们隐藏知识。对中国 187 个导师-被指导者二人组(研究 1)和美国 404 名参与者(研究 2)进行的多来源、两波次的数据调查结果表明,我们的预测是正确的。这项研究增进了我们对指导、嫉妒和主动性的了解,并为提高指导计划的有效性提供了实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信