The Impact of Rastra-BPNT Assistance on Household Food Expenditure Patterns and Poverty Status in Indonesia

M. I. Fardian, M. Nazer, Fajri Muharja
{"title":"The Impact of Rastra-BPNT Assistance on Household Food Expenditure Patterns and Poverty Status in Indonesia","authors":"M. I. Fardian, M. Nazer, Fajri Muharja","doi":"10.37034/infeb.v6i1.794","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study uses Susenas March 2019 raw data in a cross-section of 34 provinces and 514 districts/cities in Indonesia with a coverage of 315,672 households, designed using a quasi-experiment on the treatment group and control group after program implementation. The treatment group was formed by beneficiary families while the control group was formed by non-beneficiary families. The sample of beneficiaries was 50,485 or 9,845,922 households if calculated with Susenas weighting (65.55% of the total 2019 realization of 15,020,323 national beneficiaries) and non-beneficiaries were 181,358 households. The data were analyzed using a probit regression model and impact estimation was conducted using the Propensity Score Matching (PSM) approach. The results suggest that education level is a bigger determinant for households to become Rastra-BPNT beneficiaries, especially for household heads who did not finish primary school and those who graduated from primary school. Rastra-BPNT food social assistance has a significant and positively correlated impact on beneficiary families with a pattern of food proportion to total expenditure > 50%. There was a shift in the food consumption budget share for Beneficiary Families in several dominant commodities such as grains; eggs and milk; processed food and beverages; and cigarettes, tobacco and betel. The distribution of Rastra-BPNT from November 2018 to February 2019 can reduce the gap between household groups, but there are still errors in the distribution of benefits.","PeriodicalId":242689,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Informatika Ekonomi Bisnis","volume":"13 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Informatika Ekonomi Bisnis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37034/infeb.v6i1.794","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study uses Susenas March 2019 raw data in a cross-section of 34 provinces and 514 districts/cities in Indonesia with a coverage of 315,672 households, designed using a quasi-experiment on the treatment group and control group after program implementation. The treatment group was formed by beneficiary families while the control group was formed by non-beneficiary families. The sample of beneficiaries was 50,485 or 9,845,922 households if calculated with Susenas weighting (65.55% of the total 2019 realization of 15,020,323 national beneficiaries) and non-beneficiaries were 181,358 households. The data were analyzed using a probit regression model and impact estimation was conducted using the Propensity Score Matching (PSM) approach. The results suggest that education level is a bigger determinant for households to become Rastra-BPNT beneficiaries, especially for household heads who did not finish primary school and those who graduated from primary school. Rastra-BPNT food social assistance has a significant and positively correlated impact on beneficiary families with a pattern of food proportion to total expenditure > 50%. There was a shift in the food consumption budget share for Beneficiary Families in several dominant commodities such as grains; eggs and milk; processed food and beverages; and cigarettes, tobacco and betel. The distribution of Rastra-BPNT from November 2018 to February 2019 can reduce the gap between household groups, but there are still errors in the distribution of benefits.
印度尼西亚 Rastra-BPNT 援助对家庭食品支出模式和贫困状况的影响
本研究使用苏森纳(Susenas)2019 年 3 月的原始数据,覆盖印度尼西亚 34 个省和 514 个县/市,涉及 315 672 户家庭,在计划实施后对治疗组和对照组进行了准实验设计。治疗组由受益家庭组成,对照组由非受益家庭组成。受益人样本为 50 485 户,如果按照苏塞纳斯加权法计算,则为 9 845 922 户(占 2019 年实现的全国受益人总数 15 020 323 户的 65.55%),非受益人样本为 181 358 户。数据采用概率回归模型进行分析,影响估计采用倾向得分匹配法(PSM)进行。结果表明,教育水平是家庭成为 Rastra-BPNT 受益者的一个较大的决定因素,尤其是对于小学未毕业的户主和小学毕业的户主而言。Rastra-BPNT 粮食社会援助对食品占总支出的比例大于 50%的受益家庭有显著的正相关影响。受益家庭在几种主要商品中的食品消费预算份额发生了变化,如谷物、鸡蛋和牛奶、加工食品和饮料以及香烟、烟草和槟榔。从 2018 年 11 月到 2019 年 2 月,Rastra-BPNT 的分配可以缩小家庭群体之间的差距,但福利分配仍存在误差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信