The Trade-Off between Enteric and Manure Methane Emissions and Their Bacterial Ecology in Lactating Cows Fed Diets Varying in Forage-to-Concentrate Ratio and Rapeseed Oil

Methane Pub Date : 2024-01-09 DOI:10.3390/methane3010002
Babak Darabighane, I. Tapio, S. Rasi, Ari-Matti Seppänen, Lucia Blasco, S. Ahvenjärvi, Ali R. Bayat
{"title":"The Trade-Off between Enteric and Manure Methane Emissions and Their Bacterial Ecology in Lactating Cows Fed Diets Varying in Forage-to-Concentrate Ratio and Rapeseed Oil","authors":"Babak Darabighane, I. Tapio, S. Rasi, Ari-Matti Seppänen, Lucia Blasco, S. Ahvenjärvi, Ali R. Bayat","doi":"10.3390/methane3010002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An experiment was conducted to examine how dietary interventions reducing enteric methane (CH4) emissions influence manure CH4 emissions in biogas production (as biochemical methane potential (BMP)) or under static conditions mimicking natural manure storage conditions. Experimental treatments consisted of a factorial arrangement of high (HF: 0.65) or low (LF: 0.35) levels of forage and 0 or 50 g of rapeseed oil per kg of diet dry matter. Oil supplementation reduced daily enteric CH4 emissions, especially in the HF diet, by 20%. Greater dietary concentrate proportion reduced CH4 yield and intensity (6 and 12%, respectively) and decreased pH, increased total volatile fatty acids, and molar proportions of butyrate and valerate in feces incubated under static conditions. Oil supplementation increased daily BMP and BMP calculated per unit of organic matter (OM) (17 and 15%, respectively). Increased dietary concentrate had no impact on daily BMP and BMP per unit of OM, whereas it reduced daily CH4 production by 89% and CH4 per unit of OM by 91% under static conditions. Dietary oil supplementation tended to decrease fecal CH4 production per unit of digestible OM (23%) under static conditions. Diets had no impact on the alpha diversity of ruminal prokaryotes. After incubation, the fecal prokaryote community was significantly less diverse. Diets had no effect on alpha diversity in the BMP experiment, but static trial fecal samples originating from the HF diet showed significantly lower diversity compared with the LF diet. Overall, the tested dietary interventions reduced enteric CH4 emissions and reduced or tended to reduce manure CH4 emissions under static conditions, indicating a lack of trade-off between enteric and manure CH4 emissions. The potential for increasing CH4 yields in biogas industries due to dietary interventions could lead to a sustainable synergy between farms and industry.","PeriodicalId":507407,"journal":{"name":"Methane","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Methane","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/methane3010002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An experiment was conducted to examine how dietary interventions reducing enteric methane (CH4) emissions influence manure CH4 emissions in biogas production (as biochemical methane potential (BMP)) or under static conditions mimicking natural manure storage conditions. Experimental treatments consisted of a factorial arrangement of high (HF: 0.65) or low (LF: 0.35) levels of forage and 0 or 50 g of rapeseed oil per kg of diet dry matter. Oil supplementation reduced daily enteric CH4 emissions, especially in the HF diet, by 20%. Greater dietary concentrate proportion reduced CH4 yield and intensity (6 and 12%, respectively) and decreased pH, increased total volatile fatty acids, and molar proportions of butyrate and valerate in feces incubated under static conditions. Oil supplementation increased daily BMP and BMP calculated per unit of organic matter (OM) (17 and 15%, respectively). Increased dietary concentrate had no impact on daily BMP and BMP per unit of OM, whereas it reduced daily CH4 production by 89% and CH4 per unit of OM by 91% under static conditions. Dietary oil supplementation tended to decrease fecal CH4 production per unit of digestible OM (23%) under static conditions. Diets had no impact on the alpha diversity of ruminal prokaryotes. After incubation, the fecal prokaryote community was significantly less diverse. Diets had no effect on alpha diversity in the BMP experiment, but static trial fecal samples originating from the HF diet showed significantly lower diversity compared with the LF diet. Overall, the tested dietary interventions reduced enteric CH4 emissions and reduced or tended to reduce manure CH4 emissions under static conditions, indicating a lack of trade-off between enteric and manure CH4 emissions. The potential for increasing CH4 yields in biogas industries due to dietary interventions could lead to a sustainable synergy between farms and industry.
饲喂不同草料与精料比例和菜籽油日粮的泌乳奶牛肠道和粪便甲烷排放及其细菌生态之间的权衡
我们进行了一项实验,以研究减少肠道甲烷(CH4)排放的日粮干预措施如何影响沼气生产(作为生化甲烷潜能值(BMP))或模拟自然粪便储存条件的静态条件下的粪便 CH4 排放。实验处理由高水平(HF:0.65)或低水平(LF:0.35)饲草和每公斤日粮干物质中 0 或 50 克菜籽油的因子排列组成。补充菜籽油可将每天的肠道甲烷排放量减少 20%,尤其是在高浓度日粮中。日粮精料比例越高,CH4 产量和强度越低(分别为 6% 和 12%),pH 值越低,总挥发性脂肪酸以及丁酸盐和戊酸盐在静态条件下培养的粪便中的摩尔比例越高。补油增加了日生物量和单位有机物(OM)计算的生物量(分别为 17% 和 15%)。日粮精料的增加对日BMP和单位OM的BMP没有影响,而在静态条件下,日CH4产生量减少了89%,单位OM的CH4产生量减少了91%。在静态条件下,补充日粮油往往会降低单位可消化 OM 的粪便 CH4 产量(23%)。日粮对瘤胃原核生物的阿尔法多样性没有影响。培养后,粪便原核生物群落的多样性明显降低。在 BMP 试验中,饮食对阿尔法多样性没有影响,但与低脂饮食相比,来自高脂饮食的静态试验粪便样本的多样性明显较低。总体而言,在静态条件下,测试的日粮干预措施减少了肠道甲烷排放量,减少或倾向于减少粪便甲烷排放量,这表明肠道甲烷排放量和粪便甲烷排放量之间缺乏权衡。日粮干预措施有可能提高沼气工业的甲烷产量,这将使农场和工业之间产生可持续的协同效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信